September 2007

If you live in Canada and aren’t aware that CBC Newsworld runs a lot of great doc­u­ment­aries, then you’re missing out. Here are just a few bits of exciting news about their upcoming schedule.

  • This Sunday night, September 23rd, at 10pm Eastern and Pacific time, catch Everything’s Cool (review), a great pos­itive doc­u­mentary about cli­mate change and people that are actu­ally trying to do some­thing about this scourge.
  • During the week of October 7th, the net­work is screening five of the films from the Why Democracy? pro­ject, three of which just screened at TIFF (the other two were fea­tured at Hot Docs earlier this year). Full schedule and more inform­a­tion here.

Be proud, Canadians. These are your tax dol­lars at work!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Le Voyage du Ballon Rouge (The Voyage of the Red Balloon)

Le Voyage du Ballon Rouge (Director: Hou Hsiao-hsien): I have to admit that as much as I’m familiar with Hou Hsiao-hsien’s name, I hadn’t seen any of his pre­vious films (Three Times (2005) and Café Lumiere (2003) being the most recent). That being said, someone I know told me that in his opinion, most of Hou’s best work was from the 80s and 90s and is actu­ally pretty hard to find. Setting the film in Paris was admit­tedly a gamble, and deciding to make a sort of homage to Albert Lamarisse’s classic children’s film La Ballon Rouge (1956) an even bigger one. For me, anyway, it didn’t pay off.

We’re dropped into a story with very little expos­i­tion. Juliette Binoche plays Suzanne, a voice actor for a puppet theatre and a har­ried single mom. Her son, Simon, is watched by a new nanny, Song Fang, who just hap­pens to be both Chinese and a film stu­dent making a film. So, with an obvious dir­ect­orial stand-in in place, what hap­pens? Not too much. Song uses Simon in her film pro­ject which is very much like the classic film, and we see footage scattered throughout the rest of the main film including, some­what con­fus­ingly, at the very begin­ning, before we’ve even met the char­ac­ters. There are also scenes where the tit­ular orb floats out­side the apart­ment when Song is not actu­ally filming. I found its pres­ence baff­ling most of the time, and the film, like the lives it por­trays, as scattered and uneven, though well-intentioned. Suzanne’s living arrange­ments are messy and her rela­tion­ships unclear, and by the end of the film, there’s really no sense of res­ol­u­tion. What I did like about the film was its won­derful use of nat­ural light, as well as the cor­res­ponding nat­ur­al­ness of the dia­logue, with char­ac­ters repeating dia­logue not heard the first time by other char­ac­ters, and other real­istic touches.

But in the end, I wasn’t really moved. My bal­loon, instead of taking flight, just slowly deflated over the film’s 113 minutes.

Trailer

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

All The President’s Men

by James McNally on September 18, 2007

in DVD

All The President's Men

All The President’s Men (Director: Alan J. Pakula): I was seven years old when the Watergate scandal broke in 1972, and I learned about it mostly from reading Mad magazine, believe it or not. Still, 35 years later, I’m not exactly sure exactly what happened, and I ser­i­ously believe that nobody under 50 even cares. But what Watergate showed us is that the abuse of power in a demo­cracy is not new, but that stupid and evil people some­times don’t get away with their crimes. That is, if the media is doing its job.

All The President’s Men was ori­gin­ally a book pub­lished by the two men respons­ible for breaking the story, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, both reporters for the Washington Post at the time of the scandal. Pakula’s film teamed up two of the era’s hot­test actors, Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford, and attempted to dram­atize the story of per­haps the biggest polit­ical scandal of the 20th cen­tury. But though the film scooped four Oscars (including an adapted screen­play Oscar for writer William Goldman), I don’t think it’s aged well.

Audiences approaching the film today with little back­ground know­ledge will come away baffled, since the story moves along at break­neck pace, with names being tossed out with no con­text. The film­makers may have assumed that in 1976, people would still be familiar with the story, since it occu­pied the news­pa­pers for months on end. But without that back­ground, it can seem pretty opaque. As well, we learn next to nothing about any of the char­ac­ters, most not­ably our intrepid journ­al­ists. Worst of all, des­pite a run­ning time well over two hours, the con­clu­sion of the film is remark­ably weak. A final road­b­lock seems to be wrapped up hastily and the ending dis­ap­points with nothing but a tele­type machine informing us of sev­eral indict­ments. There’s not even any archival footage of Nixon talking about the scandal, nor of his resignation.

Mad Magazine, December 1974

Despite its obvious weak­nesses, I still feel this is an important film, because it inspires the belief that journalism’s func­tion is to empower demo­cracy by speaking the truth to power. It’s out­rageous that increasing cor­porate own­er­ship and con­sol­id­a­tion of the media land­scape has left our demo­cracy weaker and less account­able. My only wish would be for someone to make a strong doc­u­mentary about Watergate to edu­cate a younger gen­er­a­tion. Maybe they could even recycle some of Mad’s satir­ical Watergate songs.

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Chaotic Ana (Caótica Ana)

Chaotic Ana (Caótica Ana) (Director: Julio Medem): Chaotic is one way to put it. Train wreck might be more accurate. Annoying, arti­fi­cial, absurd, and by the end, simply appalling. This was a real dis­ap­point­ment. I had been warned earlier in the week by some friends who saw the first screening, but I wanted to see for myself. Unfortunately, Medem has turned all the ele­ments of his pre­vious films up to 11, making this a jumbled mess of coin­cid­ence, chance encoun­ters, per­form­ance art, hyp­nosis and an inter­na­tional cast speaking all the wrong lan­guages. The dir­ector has clearly bitten off more than he can chew, and though the first half was at least watch­able, I was annoyed by what appeared to be a kind of “show-off” atti­tude. Ana (played by the lovely Manuela Vellés) is a raw-talented painter living in a cave with her father on the island of Ibiza. One day, the slightly sin­ister Justine (Charlotte Rampling) arrives and offers to take her to Madrid and be her patron. Once there, she’s esconced in a dec­adent and mys­ter­ious house filled with artists of all kinds. Cue the pre­ten­tious art talk.

Then Ana begins to have powerful flash­backs and through a random encounter with experts in hyp­nosis, is sud­denly the sub­ject of numerous ses­sions exploring her past lives. Then she escapes as a stowaway on her friend’s father’s yacht and ends up in New York City, where both her hand­some young hyp­notist and Justine find her and take her to the desert, to dis­cover her “true” self, the first in a long series of rein­carn­ated women who all die viol­ently at the age of 22. Still with me? There’s more. By the end, there’s even a ludicrous attempt to tie everything into the Iraq war.

Using inter­titles to count down from 10 to 0, as in hyp­nosis, had one pos­itive func­tion. It let me know how much longer I had to endure. Even the sight of often-nude Ana wasn’t enough to make me stop wishing it would end. Medem is a tal­ented dir­ector, but this was just self-indulgent and for that reason, it’s all the more disappointing.

Trailer
Official Site

5/10(5/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A Gentle Breeze in the Village (Tennen kokekkô)

A Gentle Breeze in the Village (Tennen kokekkô) (Director: Nobuhiro Yamashita): Director Nobuhiro Yamashita clearly loved school. His last film, Linda Linda Linda, was set in a high school, and this film is his ode to the rural schools, where primary and middle school stu­dents share the same building. Beautiful and sens­itive Soyo is the only stu­dent in Grade 8 at her school in the idyllic coun­tryside, and there are only six stu­dents in all. That is, until the arrival of Osawa, a cool boy from Tokyo. She’s imme­di­ately smitten with him, and although first love is thrilling for her, it also causes tur­moil in her settled life. But Osawa soon fits in and is embraced by this remark­ably close-knit group of stu­dents. The film covers a period of about 18 months, and all the time, Soyo can feel her child­hood slip­ping away. This won­derful secure bubble will burst one day, but not just yet.

Yamashita has a won­derful way of por­traying a sense of nos­talgia, even while events are hap­pening. It’s clearly an adult per­spective, and it some­times seems odd to see it being felt by teen­agers, but it had me longing for the days when all I had to worry about was my school uni­form. Adult prob­lems hover in the dis­tance. Osawa’s mother has some poten­tially major health issues in a town without a doctor. As well, she has moved back to town with him after her hus­band has left, and there’s a hint that Soyo’s father may be car­rying on an affair with her. But in gen­eral, Soyo keeps all these wor­ries at arm’s length. In her incred­ibly safe and love-filled world, she’s free to explore these new feel­ings for Osawa, all the while knowing that this means leaving behind her child­hood for good. In one incred­ibly poignant scene, after a failed kiss with Osawa, she gently kisses the school’s black­board. It’s a rehearsal for things to come, but also a farewell to some­thing she loves deeply. Among all the gor­geous imagery that the film floats in front of us, that scene speaks loudest and truest.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Nobuhiro Yamashita from after the screening (the long pauses are when the trans­lator is whis­pering the ques­tions into his ear):

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 15:04

Trailer
Official Site

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }