February 2009

Hot Docs Screening Weekend

I don’t have an awful lot of free time these days to write, but thought I should put down a few thoughts con­cerning what is turning out to be quite a con­cen­trated edu­ca­tion in fest­ival pro­gram­ming, doc­u­mentary film­making, and the endur­ance of the human atten­tion span (at least for this spe­cific human).

I’m approaching my fiftieth film in just over two weeks of this assign­ment, and a number of things have annoyed and sur­prised me. Though I’m far from an expert, I think I can con­fid­ently speak for some of the poor folks I’m working with who have screened north of 300 films already.

  • I’m amazed how “rough” some of the rough cuts we’re get­ting are. I can under­stand that the film may not be com­pletely fin­ished, but long stretches of sound with a title card reading “missing footage” are not going to leave a good impression.
  • On a related note, if your film is somehow unfin­ished, it’s incred­ibly helpful if you let me know exactly what is going to change and what isn’t. Writing some­thing like “Picture and sound locked, scratch title sequence and end credits.” on the screener disc is always more helpful than writing, say, nothing.
  • Narration isn’t always neces­sary in a doc­u­mentary, but when it is, hire a pro­fes­sional. At least one gorgeously-shot film has been spoiled for me by a nasal nar­rator speaking too quickly. Though you may be tempted as a dir­ector to “do it your­self,” this is rarely a good idea unless you have a voice like Liam Neeson.
  • It’s sur­pris­ingly easy to ignore time­codes and the water­marks on stock footage.

I hope I don’t sound too cranky. This has been an abso­lute blast so far, and the 2009 Hot Docs pro­gramme is shaping up to be the best in years. The only thing that kind of stinks right now is that I’m not really able to put too much time into plan­ning my annual SXSW pil­grimage, which is, yikes, only two weeks away. Luckily, my offer to SXSW film­makers has gone largely unnoticed, so at least I’m not going to dis­ap­point anyone by not reviewing their film early. I’m just hoping that I’ll have any stamina left at all by the time I get to Austin.

P.S. For a real inside insider’s look at the pro­gram­ming pro­cess, check out Hot Docs’ Director of Programming Sean Farnel’s blog.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Hot Docs 2009

A few days ago, I alluded to some­thing I was working on that I “couldn’t talk about” and so I’m glad that now I am able to tell you about it. I’m very hon­oured to reveal that I’m working for the 2009 edi­tion of the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival as an Associate Programmer. I’ve attended the fest­ival each year since 2004, and have always wondered how films are chosen. Director of Programming Sean Farnel has been posting about the pro­cess over on his fairly new blog, and it’s a fas­cin­ating read. It’s even more exciting, though, to be a part of it, and I’m tre­mend­ously grateful to Sean and his whole amazing crew for such a won­derful opportunity.

Though I’m not able to reveal any­thing about the films I’m cur­rently screening, I can let you know that it’s been pretty gruelling so far. Each sub­mis­sion deserves careful con­sid­er­a­tion and I’m happy to report that Hot Docs’ pro­cess gives each film its chance to shine. I’m hopeful that at least some of the films I’ve recom­mended make it into the final schedule, but I won’t know for many weeks yet.

If you live within trav­eling dis­tance of Toronto, Hot Docs really is a can’t-miss fest­ival. Even if you’ve never con­sidered your­self a fan of doc­u­ment­aries, you’re bound to come away with a fresh appre­ci­ation for all the ded­ic­ated and tal­ented film­makers telling stories about real people and places. Free from celebrity hype, man­age­able in size, and an amazing value. What’s not to love?

P.S. Documentary film­maker and blogger AJ Schnack wrote about the fest­ival pro­gram­ming pro­cess yes­terday and cites Sean’s blog as “a primer that any film­maker should read.”

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

BLAST!

BLAST! is an intriguing doc­u­mentary about a team of astro­phys­i­cists who travel to both poles in an effort to launch a massive tele­scope from a hot air bal­loon to dis­cover more about the ori­gins of the uni­verse. The film ori­gin­ally premiered at Hot Docs in 2008 and is airing in Canada on the Discovery Channel on Friday February 21st at 7:30pm EST.

Doc blogger Agnes Varnum caught the film at the Sheffield Doc Fest in November and called it:

a movie about a sci­entific pro­ject but it is also about learning through trial and error, about what we know and don’t know about the uni­verse, and also a smat­tering of faith in science.

Toronto sci­ence blogger Eva Amsen was also enthu­si­astic:

All in all, BLAST! was a blast! I loved that it was so very much focused on the work, not just on the res­ults. The film had some anim­a­tions to explain basic astro­physics con­cepts, but it also showed what the actual meas­ure­ments from the tele­scope looked like (just graphs and num­bers) and it emphas­ized how much work there was still left in actu­ally inter­preting the data. There are also some great shots of sci­ent­ists being either sad or happy depending on how the research went that day, and everyone being bored and irrit­ated when they have to wait for the weather to change. That’s sci­ence in action.

I respect the opin­ions of both of these women, and there­fore I’m looking for­ward very much to seeing BLAST! If you’re at all inter­ested in seeing real sci­ent­ists at work, and won­dering about the curi­osity that drives them to the ends of the earth in search of know­ledge, you won’t want to miss this broadcast.

Official site of the film
Trailer

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Cactus

by Jay Kerr on February 18, 2009

in Film Festivals

Cactus

Cactus (Director: Jasmine Yuen Carrucan): Questions abound in this low-budget road movie that takes place in the Australian out­back. John Kelly (Travis McMahon) is in des­perate need of some money so he takes a job which involves the kid­nap­ping of a pro­fes­sional gam­bler, Eli Jones (David Lyons). John must deliver Eli to someone in the middle of the out­back by fol­lowing metic­u­lous dir­ec­tions and instruc­tions. Along the way a policeman (Bryan Bell) becomes involved and things get more confusing.

Very little back story is revealed which makes the film exciting yet frus­trating. By the end of this journey your patience may wear thin. Like an episode of the TV show Lost, you’ll have more ques­tions than answers.

Cactus is Carrucan’s first outing as a writer and dir­ector. With little to no budget, she has made a decent film. It’s beau­ti­fully shot and the acting is com­petent. Unfortunately she left me in the out­back without a map and I’m still trying to figure out why the film is called Cactus.

Official site of the film

5/10(5/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Not Quite Hollywood

Not Quite Hollywood: The Wild, Untold Story of Ozploitation! (Director: Mark Hartley): This is a fast-paced doc­u­mentary about Australia’s “Ozploitation” films of the ‘70s and early ‘80s. It’s a cel­eb­ra­tion of the for­gotten action movies, sex com­edies and horror films that could never have been made in Hollywood.

Interviews with Quentin Tarantino, Dennis Hopper and Jamie Lee Curtis will pique the curi­osity of North American audi­ences. An end­less number of clips accom­pany the inter­views. After 90 minutes you’ll under­stand why films such as Saw, Wolf Creek and even Death Proof are inspired by some of the Ozploitation films.

The action movies from this era were unbe­liev­able in their quest for realism. There are tales of live ammuni­tion being fired at actors. Dangerous high speed stunts often res­ulted in broken bones and some­times even death. High speed auto­mobile chases were routinely filmed without per­mits on open streets.

In The Man From Hong Kong George Lazenby was set on fire because a stunt double wouldn’t look as con­vin­cing. Of course, Lazenby was burned per­forming this stunt and he became so angry that he punched the director.

While making the horror film Thirst, Henry Silva refused to hang out of real heli­copter. The dir­ector found a crane and told Silva that they would sus­pend him only a few feet off the ground and fake the shot. Once filming started the crane was raised 70 feet into the air with Silva hanging on for dear life.

If you love film then I think you’ll find this doc­u­mentary to be very enter­taining. The opening title sequence and pro­duc­tion values are top notch and you’ll be amazed at some of the stories that come out of the interviews.

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }