All The President’s Men

by James McNally on September 18, 2007

in DVD

All The President's Men

All The President’s Men (Director: Alan J. Pakula): I was seven years old when the Watergate scandal broke in 1972, and I learned about it mostly from reading Mad magazine, believe it or not. Still, 35 years later, I’m not exactly sure exactly what happened, and I ser­i­ously believe that nobody under 50 even cares. But what Watergate showed us is that the abuse of power in a demo­cracy is not new, but that stupid and evil people some­times don’t get away with their crimes. That is, if the media is doing its job.

All The President’s Men was ori­gin­ally a book pub­lished by the two men respons­ible for breaking the story, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, both reporters for the Washington Post at the time of the scandal. Pakula’s film teamed up two of the era’s hot­test actors, Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford, and attempted to dram­atize the story of per­haps the biggest polit­ical scandal of the 20th cen­tury. But though the film scooped four Oscars (including an adapted screen­play Oscar for writer William Goldman), I don’t think it’s aged well.

Audiences approaching the film today with little back­ground know­ledge will come away baffled, since the story moves along at break­neck pace, with names being tossed out with no con­text. The film­makers may have assumed that in 1976, people would still be familiar with the story, since it occu­pied the news­pa­pers for months on end. But without that back­ground, it can seem pretty opaque. As well, we learn next to nothing about any of the char­ac­ters, most not­ably our intrepid journ­al­ists. Worst of all, des­pite a run­ning time well over two hours, the con­clu­sion of the film is remark­ably weak. A final road­b­lock seems to be wrapped up hastily and the ending dis­ap­points with nothing but a tele­type machine informing us of sev­eral indict­ments. There’s not even any archival footage of Nixon talking about the scandal, nor of his resignation.

Mad Magazine, December 1974

Despite its obvious weak­nesses, I still feel this is an important film, because it inspires the belief that journalism’s func­tion is to empower demo­cracy by speaking the truth to power. It’s out­rageous that increasing cor­porate own­er­ship and con­sol­id­a­tion of the media land­scape has left our demo­cracy weaker and less account­able. My only wish would be for someone to make a strong doc­u­mentary about Watergate to edu­cate a younger gen­er­a­tion. Maybe they could even recycle some of Mad’s satir­ical Watergate songs.

7/10(7/10)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: