November 2008

Le Tueur (The Killer)

Le Tueur (The Killer) (2007, Director: Cédric Anger): Dimitry is a hitman vis­iting Paris with a simple assign­ment: kill busi­nessman Leo Zimmerman. Only Leo has figured it out and con­fronts Dimitry before he can do the job, offering him a strange “deal.” If he gives him a few more days to get his fin­an­cial affairs in order so that his young daughter can be taken care of, he’ll cooperate fully in his own murder. From there, the twists the plot takes make it impossible for me to provide any more synopsis.

By the end, though, you’ll have more sym­pathy for the hitman, who is able to somehow tran­scend his grim pro­fes­sion to commit at least one good deed, and maybe more.

Gilbert Melki as Leo
Le Tueur (The Killer)

This noirish debut from writer-director Cédric Anger doesn’t break any new ground in terms of style or story, but it’s a well-acted and paced study of two dif­ferent char­ac­ters. Both Grégoire Colin as Dimitry and Gilbert Melki as Leo are out­standing, with Melki par­tic­u­larly adept at playing a com­plic­ated char­acter. Some of the brushtrokes are a little clumsy (the hitman is fath­er­less, of course; the businessman’s wife is having an affair), a few of the twists don’t make sense, and set­ting the date of the exe­cu­tion on Christmas Eve was not only over the top, but came out of nowhere, at least for me. But Le Tueur was nev­er­the­less an enjoy­able film that builds very slowly and respects the per­form­ances of its actors.

Grégoire Colin as Dimitry
Le Tueur (The Killer)

Trailer (pos­sible spoilers)

7/10(7/10)

Note: Le Tueur is not only the debut of writer-director Anger, but of Montréal’s Evokative Films, whose founder Stéphanie Trépanier I inter­viewed recently. The film opens in Toronto on Friday November 28 at the AMC Yonge and Dundas.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Stéphanie Trépanier - Evokative Films

Evokative Films is a brand-new Canadian film dis­trib­utor founded in early 2008 with a fresh per­spective on the dis­tri­bu­tion busi­ness. With a strong online pres­ence (a bilin­gual blog, YouTube channel and Facebook page), its mis­sion is “to bring clever, enter­taining and ori­ginal inter­na­tional genre fea­tures to film enthu­si­asts across Canada.”

I con­tacted founder Stéphanie Trépanier, based in Montréal, to find out a little bit more about this exciting new player in the Canadian market.

James McNally (JM): Stéphanie, can you tell us a little bit about your­self and your back­ground and what brought you to start Evokative?

Stéphanie Trépanier (ST): Ah, where to start. Well, I’m a French-Canadian born and raised on the south shore of Montréal. Having par­ents who trav­elled, I was raised to be curious about the world and other cul­tures. From as far back as I can remember, I was always inter­ested in cinema and inter­na­tional film. The small­ness of the inter­na­tional sec­tion of the local video­club always depressed me. My little brother was an avid film-watcher too, but more on the horror side. During my teenage years my interest in inde­pendent cinema and anim­a­tion grew and I started going to the Fantasia Festival in its second year. That fest­ival was such a relief, bringing to the screens so many films that we would just never see otherwise.

My par­ents started their own busi­ness in pack­aging machinery dis­tri­bu­tion when I was eight years old, in our house’s garage. Over the past 20 years, it has grown to become one of the most important com­panies in its sector in Canada. Evidently I learned a lot from watching them work and the com­pany grow. I was also involved in the com­pany for a number of years and learned about the many aspects of its admin­is­tra­tion. But after a while, I real­ized I needed more pas­sion in my work and that what I really wanted to do was to work in film.

So I quit the day job and went back to school to get a Bachelor’s degree in Public Relations, with a minor in Marketing and some Film classes. I figured PR was going to be my foot in the door of the film industry. While I was still in uni­ver­sity I started working for the Fantasia Festival, which was then in its 9th edi­tion and had grown to become one of the major cine­matic events in the country. People who don’t think there is an audi­ence for inter­na­tional genre film need to go to Fantasia and see the line-ups of people excited about what they’re about to exper­i­ence. It made me see how much the genre film audi­ence is curious, pas­sionate and loyal, which makes them the best “cus­tomers” there can be, if they are listened and catered to. Which is not always the case in the film industry.

I then went on to work for Christal Films, then a major film dis­trib­utor in Québec, where I mostly took care of the PR for the English releases. Eventually I got a pro­mo­tion to the DVD depart­ment, and it’s there that the Evokative seed got planted. I was never too sure of the the­at­rical poten­tial of inter­na­tional genre film, but in DVD it can def­in­itely work. About a year ago, the com­pany started not going so well and I decided it was time I tried going on my own.

Evokative Films

JM: Are you the only employee so far? What are your plans to grow the busi­ness in the next year, espe­cially in light of the looming eco­nomic recession?

ST: Yes, I’m the only person in the com­pany at the moment, save for my mother who lends me her accounting expertise. But it’s gotten to be too much work lately so I’m actu­ally in the pro­cess of hiring an assistant. Distributing films is a lot of work, much more than what can be expected, but I’ll try to keep the team as small as pos­sible. The small over­head is what makes Evokative pos­sible, not having to meet the same num­bers the other bigger dis­trib­utors need to keep things rolling. For sure the looming reces­sion brings some uncer­tainty and I’ve exper­i­enced the weak­ening dollar, but I think/hope the film industry won’t be too affected. We all need to be enter­tained when things are not going great!

JM: What’s the focus of the port­folio, other than “genre” films? Do you skew toward thrillers, or horror, or are there plans to cover other genres as well?

ST: The term “genre film” is one that has so many dif­ferent defin­i­tions. For a lot of people, it means horror and thrillers. For me, genre films are films that respond to the rules of a par­tic­ular genre, but also have an edge. I like diversity, so I intend to have just as many com­edies as horror films. I also like it when the genres are mixed. Le Tueur is a thriller, but also a psy­cho­lo­gical drama. Hansel and Gretel is a fant­astic film going towards horror. Adrift in Tokyo is a blend of walking road movie, comedy and human drama. My main focus, when it comes to choosing films for Evokative, is that the film has to be ori­ginal, clever and enter­taining. There will always be a char­ac­ter­istic that will be more important than the others, but the three have to be there. It also has to be a film that no other Canadian dis­trib­utors have been inter­ested in bringing here, but fans of the genre have been asking for, such as Crying Fist and Hazard.

JM: What’s your strategy for the­at­rical dis­tri­bu­tion versus DVD? I find genre films (and most other films) are more fun to exper­i­ence with an audi­ence, on a large screen. Have you been able to build rela­tion­ships with the cinema chains across the country, or are you focus­sing on the inde­pendent cinemas more?

ST: I totally agree that films are much better to see with an audi­ence, on a large screen. Everybody agrees with that, but fewer and fewer people walk the walk, in terms of actu­ally going to see a film in a cinema reg­u­larly. So screening films in a theatre has become less and less prof­it­able. Prints and advert­ising costs are so high that it’s very easy to lose money in the ven­ture. So it is under­stand­able that an increasing number of films are released dir­ectly onto DVD.

I’m just begin­ning, so I have to start a rela­tion­ship with the theatre owners. I’m going just as much for the chains as for the inde­pendent cinemas. What’s important for me is the loc­a­tion of the cinema, the quality of the screen and the com­fort of the chairs. For the Montreal release of Le Tueur (The Killer), I went with the Ex-Centris, an inde­pendent cinema, and the AMC Forum, a chain. In Toronto it will play at the AMC Yonge and Dundas, which is huge. But for Vancouver I’m looking into one of the Festival Cinemas.

I’ll have about a 50/50 ratio of films going to theatres or going straight to DVD. I don’t really want to get too involved in the high costs, the work and stress a the­at­rical release brings, but I also want to give the audi­ence a chance to see the film on the big screen. Also, the DVD needs to have some buzz and good reviews to get a proper career, and most of the reviews are obtained through a the­at­rical release.

Le Tueur (The Killer)

JM: Tell us a little bit about Le Tueur (The Killer), the French thriller that was your first acquis­i­tion. What was the pro­cess of acquiring the film like? Were you nervous about nego­ti­ating? Were there other con­tenders for the Canadian rights?

ST: The com­pany only incor­por­ated in April, and by May I was at Cannes. I didn’t know anyone and all I had to rep­resent myself was the Evokative Manifesto printed on a post­card. I booked as many meet­ings as I pos­sibly could on-site and I just had to deliver the Evokative pitch con­vin­cingly. Some meet­ings were dis­astrous, with the sales agent clearly looking at me as if I came from another planet. But others got the Evokative vision and found it very refreshing. UGC was one of those. There were no other dis­trib­utors con­tending for Le Tueur and it was already pro­grammed at Fantasia, so it was perfect.

The first buy is obvi­ously the most dif­fi­cult, [because] you have nothing to show for your­self except your will­ing­ness to make it. Just a few months in, it is already much easier. The fact that a big dis­tri­bu­tion com­pany like UGC trusted a new­comer with Le Tueur opened doors. I have many more con­tacts from the fest­ivals I attended (TIFF, Pusan) and the films acquired. I also got some nice industry press in the last few months and the line-up I’ve cre­ated speaks for Evokative.

I’m not in the busi­ness of fighting with other dis­trib­utors for the rights to a film. Starting up, I don’t have the funds to get into bid­ding wars. Also, the goal of Evokative is to bring films that oth­er­wise wouldn’t get dis­tri­bu­tion in Canada.

Evok - Evokative Films

JM: I love Evok, your “mascot”. Can you tell us a bit about his story, who designed him and what your plans are for him in the future?

ST: I dealt with Upperkut, a mar­keting agency here in Montréal, for the devel­op­ment of the visual iden­tity of Evokative. It was a long and arduous pro­cess, but I’m extremely happy of the result. I told them I wanted some kind of char­acter and Antonin Brault, one of their cre­ative dir­ectors, came up with Evok. He even made a real-life puppet for the pitch.

Evok brings a bit of comic relief in this very “ser­ious” busi­ness of dis­tri­bu­tion. He also trans­lates in a funny way the emo­tions that genre films bring about. He already has his own anim­a­tion and we’ll see what we can have him do in the future.

JM: Tell me how you’re using the web as a small company.

ST: I very much believe in the future of the web for film pro­mo­tion. It allows us to reach the audi­ence dir­ectly, much more than with the main­stream media. I founded Evokative for inter­na­tional film fans, so I want to get them involved and start a dialogue.

The last few months have been very exciting for me and I liked the idea of being able to share in the pro­gress of the busi­ness, as well as giving as much inform­a­tion on the films as soon as they’re acquired, to help start the buzz and word-of-mouth. A blog-based web­site like I have now and Facebook are great plat­forms for that. A new web­site, developed by Philosophy Factory in Toronto, will soon be launched. We will also have a web store so that inter­na­tional film fans can have access to the Evokative DVDs from any­where in Canada. Web-based dis­tri­bu­tion is also some­thing I want to look into as soon as possible.

For me Evokative is much more than just another film dis­tri­bu­tion com­pany. It’s about increasing the aware­ness and love of inter­na­tional genre films and also making a point that we are not pris­oners of the main­stream film system, that one can go and stand up for the pas­sion of a dif­ferent genre of cinema. Of course I’ll need the com­pany to become prof­it­able to keep run­ning, so hope­fully film fans across Canada will respond to Evokative’s mis­sion and will take it upon them­selves to spread the good word!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Of Time and the City

Of Time and the City (2008, Director: Terence Davies): Davies’ first film since 2000’s The House of Mirth, and his first doc­u­mentary, Of Time and the City has been described as a love letter to his birth­place of Liverpool. Even though he hasn’t lived in the city for many years, he grew up here during the 50s and 60s, and it’s this now-vanished place that he remem­bers. Using his own voi­ceover makes the film extremely per­sonal, and this par­tic­u­larity gives the film its emo­tional power. However, it can also make it hard for many people to con­nect with. Davies is a truly unique voice, and his love/hate rela­tion­ship with Liverpool encom­passes his lifelong struggle with his Catholicism and his homosexuality.

I’d love to say more, but unfor­tu­nately my screener was marred by a scratch that caused the film to stutter for about ten minutes right in the middle. This would def­in­itely be worth a rewatch, prefer­ably pro­jected on a large screen.

Official site of the film
Trailer

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Flower in the Pocket

Flower in the Pocket (Director: Liew Seng Tat): Just before the screening, I over­heard someone praising the Malaysian film­makers’ ability to tell inter­esting stories on min­is­cule budgets and then when the film was intro­duced, it was revealed that this film was made for US$10,000-$15,000. After seeing this, I can concur with that judge­ment. In his dir­ect­orial debut, dir­ector Liew Seng Tat weaves a remark­ably rich and evoc­ative por­trait of an unusual family with an unex­plained core of pain. When the film begins we meet Ma Li Ahn and Ma Li Ohm, two young Chinese-speaking brothers living in Kuala Lumpur. We observe their impish play and their dif­fi­culties at school, and how they depend on one another. When they do finally get home, the older boy, who appears to be about 9, makes three bowls of soup. The boys eat theirs, and leave the other bowl covered up as they head off to bed.

Later that night, their father Siu comes home. A single father, he works as a man­nequin maker, and seems pro­foundly cut off from human con­tact, even con­tact with his own sons. Remarkably, father and sons aren’t even in the same frame for almost an hour. But the boys are resourceful and have each other. They seem to be happy. When they meet the tom­boyish Ayu, she takes them home to meet her mother, who feeds them like the almost-feral creatures they resemble. It’s only at this point that the audi­ence real­izes how neg­lected the boys are.

Their father isn’t exactly uncaring, but he almost seems incap­able of expressing love. Only later do we get a hint of the wound at the heart of the family, when Siu takes an old photo of a couple out of a shoebox, tears it in two, and tries to swallow the half with the woman’s pic­ture. I assume this is the boys’ mother, but they never seem to ask for her. All this would seem unbear­ably sad except for the won­der­fully impish per­form­ances of the brothers. As well, near the end, Siu seems to be making an effort to recon­nect with the world, and most import­antly, with his sons. There is also a good amount of humour in the film, some of it bor­dering on the zany.

I believe this may have been my first exper­i­ence watching a film from Malaysia, and it was enlight­ening to observe just how multi-racial and multi-lingual a place like Kuala Lumpur is. With so many dif­ferent cul­tures clashing, there is plenty of room for mis­un­der­stand­ings, many of which the dir­ector plays for laughs. But it’s also a place where people can fall through the cracks, and the scenes where the younger boy struggles in school because he can’t under­stand the Malay lan­guage point out that without family or friends, the modern mul­ti­cul­tural city can be a scary place for children.

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced their doc­u­mentary short­list yes­terday. Here are the 15 films selected:

Though I’ve seen just three of the nom­in­ated films so far, I’m pretty con­fident saying I’d be bit­terly dis­ap­pointed if Man on Wire fails to win the Oscar. Like some other com­ment­ators, I’m sur­prised and a bit let down that Yung Chang’s Up the Yangtze (review) wasn’t shortlisted.

Documentarian AJ Schnack (Kurt Cobain: About a Son) is breaking these down over on his excel­lent blog, All These Wonderful Things.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }