March 2009

You see, I can go ahead and use that post title because I can guar­antee you that I will never be reviewing either the 1968 tear­jerker of the same name or the soggy 2001 remake with Charlize Theron and Keanu Reeves. Instead, here’s what I’m excited about:

Now I need to find some way to fin­ance my way to cover all three and give me an excuse to soak up hun­dreds of doc­u­ment­aries in chilly northern Europe! Film fest­ival pro­gram­mers, magazines, web sites, dis­trib­utors, pub­li­cists, I am avail­able to do your bid­ding. Get in touch!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Les fourmis rouges (Red Ants)

Les fourmis rouges (Red Ants) (Director: Stéphan Carpiaux): You only need to look at the film’s poster to determine the appeal of Stéphan Carpiaux’s debut fea­ture. The stun­ningly beau­tiful Déborah François plays 16-year-old Alex, who lives alone with her father and helps him run his garage in the Belgian coun­tryside. Unfortunately, the film itself isn’t really any­thing spe­cial, and if it weren’t for the mag­netism of young Ms. François, I prob­ably wouldn’t have watched this until the pre­dict­ably upbeat ending.

Alex and her father Franck are still grieving the loss of her mother and his wife in an auto acci­dent sev­eral years before. As Alex grows into woman­hood, she begins to resemble her mother more and more, even as she attempts to replace her in Franck’s life. This leads to some awk­ward longing glances between the two, though neither seem artic­u­late enough to deal with this taboo dir­ectly. Her father’s debts are piling up as he neg­lects his busi­ness, and he’s rebuffing the efforts of Anne, a book­keeper who wants to help but who com­plic­ated things years before when she expressed her romantic interest in Franck too soon after his wife’s death. Alex is also a loner, and des­pite her looks, only seems to be bait for teasing from the boys at school.

In order to help with the mounting bills, she takes a job looking after Irène, an older English woman who lives with her adopted “nephew” Hector, who is a musical genius but also an oddball with no friends. Predictably, the rela­tion­ship with Irène starts out rocky, thaws a bit, and then chills again. The woman is wholly dependent upon Hector and refuses to let him pursue his musical edu­ca­tion. There is an entirely pre­dict­able sub­plot about her trying to pre­vent him from attending the Conservatory and another uncon­vin­cingly linking Alex and Hector romantically.

It was frus­trating to watch these inar­tic­u­late char­ac­ters struggle to try to deal with their pent-up emo­tions. As well, there were so many clichés in the storytelling that it became dis­tracting. Of course, Alex runs away from home wearing a clingy dress, and then is caught in a down­pour. Combining the use of pathetic fal­lacy (because she is sad, it rains) with the chance to show her soaking wet in a clingy dress might have seemed eco­nom­ical to the dir­ector, but it made me cringe.

To make mat­ters even more con­fusing, there is a repeated story about the pro­gres­sion of a line of red ants that made no sense to me, unless it had some­thing to do with the recur­ring images of wind­mills. I don’t think I’m that deaf to meta­phor; I just couldn’t put it together.

Les fourmis rouges is not exactly a ter­rible film. It’s just not as ser­ious as it thinks it is, nor as fresh. The excep­tion, of course, is Déborah François, whom I think I could watch in any­thing from now on.

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Cinema Eye Honors trophies

Tonight was the second annual Cinema Eye Honors cere­mony, held in New York City. The Cinema Eye Honors were cre­ated last year by AJ Schnack with the sup­port of Thom Powers and Indiepix as a response to what they felt was an unfair eli­gib­ility policy for doc­u­mentary films to be con­sidered for the Academy Awards. It seems a bit strange, then, that three of the four films hon­oured tonight were con­tenders for Oscars this year (although Waltz with Bashir (review) was nom­in­ated in the Best Foreign Language Film cat­egory). That being said, I’m so glad that Yung Chang’s Up the Yangtze (review) got some deserved atten­tion after being over­looked by the Academy.

Here is the full list of win­ners from tonight’s ceremony:

Outstanding Achievement in Nonfiction Filmmaking

Man on Wire (review) pro­duced by James Marsh and Simon Chinn

Outstanding Achievement in Direction

Ari Folman, Waltz with Bashir

Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography

Peter Zeitlinger, Encounters at the End of the World

Outstanding Achievement in Editing

Jinx Godfrey, Man on Wire

Outstanding Achievement in Graphic Design and Animation

Yoni Goodman, Waltz with Bashir

Outstanding Achievement in Music Composition

Max Richter, Waltz with Bashir

Outstanding Achievement in International Feature

Waltz with Bashir, dir­ected by Ari Folman and pro­duced by Ari Folman, Serge Lalou, Gerhard Meixner, Yael Nahlieli and Roman Paul

Outstanding Achievement in Debut Feature

Yung Chang, Up the Yangtze

Audience Choice Prize

Up the Yangtze, Yung Chang

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Over the Hills and Far Away

Over the Hills and Far Away (The Horse Boy) (Director: Michal Orion Scott): I was happy to see this film while in Austin for the South by Southwest Film Festival because the family it’s about live in the hill country just out­side of Austin, and my com­panion at the screening actu­ally worked as the father’s mas­seuse for a while. The film had also just won the Lone Star States award for the best Texas film that day and the crowd was buzzing in anticipation.

We’re intro­duced at the begin­ning of the film to Rupert Isaacson and Kristin Neff, a couple seem­ingly blessed by the gods of genetics, as they meet and fall in love while both are trav­eling through India. Then we learn that these two very attractive and intel­li­gent people have had a child and that some­thing is ter­ribly amiss. Rowan, at the tender age of two, is dia­gnosed with autism. It helps to explain, but does nothing to relieve the ter­rible tan­trums and dis­tant beha­viour his par­ents have endured. Lots of home movies com­mu­nicate very quickly the tedium that their lives have become, man­aging this beau­tiful but mys­ter­ious little boy. Then Rupert, a former horse-trainer, noticed some­thing. Rowan seemed to have a spe­cial bond with the horses on their farm, and while mounted on a horse, the tan­trums almost magic­ally dis­ap­peared. Magic, as it turns out, is central to this story. Rupert is also a human-rights worker and journ­alist who has studied indi­genous cul­tures in Africa and Asia, and he has a spe­cial interest in sham­anic healing. He puts the pieces together and decides to take his wife and son on a healing journey to Mongolia, home of the reclusive Reindeer People, the Dukha, who are renowned as the best sham­anic healers in a land of avid horsemen.

I should men­tion that by this point, Rowan had seen many tra­di­tional med­ical pro­fes­sionals and was on an onerous regime of med­ic­a­tions that didn’t seem to be helping all that much. Although Kristin, her­self a psy­cho­lo­gist, ini­tially res­isted the idea, even­tu­ally she decided to sup­port the trip, even if it only turned out to be an adven­ture for the family. Rupert is more con­fident than that, and enlists a film crew to doc­u­ment the whole thing. In the Q&A which fol­lowed the screening, dir­ector Michal Orion Scott said he couldn’t resist the idea, espe­cially because he thought the sham­anic healing prob­ably wouldn’t work.

The res­ulting film is an inter­esting com­bin­a­tion of stun­ning travelogue, family por­trait, and talking head doc about autism. The talking heads are a sore point for me, actu­ally. Esteemed autism experts from Temple Grandin (her­self aut­istic) to Dr. Simon Baron-Cohen weigh in on the con­di­tion, with various opin­ions. The only con­sensus seems to be that we don’t yet really under­stand all of autism’s dimen­sions. By con­trast, the Mongolian healers seem to treat young Rowan as if he’s demon-possessed. They speak of evil spirits, and sug­gest that a female rel­ative on Kristin’s side of the family is still tor­menting the boy. Perhaps the dir­ector is sig­naling his own uneas­i­ness with Rupert’s utter belief in the power of these shamans, but it ends up making the film feel a bit muddled.

I won’t spoil the ending of the film, but I will say that Rupert gambles just about everything on this trip. Not only is there a doc­u­mentary film, but he’s written a book (The Horse Boy) and started a found­a­tion and therapy centre for aut­istic chil­dren where they can work with horses (The Horse Boy Foundation).

Another of my issues with the film is the amount of pro­jec­tion going on. Especially con­sid­ering that Rowan’s mother is a psy­cho­lo­gist, I was amazed that the family seems to make huge leaps in logic when it con­cerns Rowan’s “bond” with animals, with the animals’ power to heal, and ulti­mately with the wisdom of indi­genous shamans. My reser­va­tions were some­what put to the side by the film’s end, but I still had lots of ques­tions. Unfortunately, they weren’t the sort of ques­tions I could ask in a fifteen-minute Q&A after the film.

Even with my slight reser­va­tions, this is a genu­inely moving film about a fas­cin­ating sub­ject. It also hap­pens to be set in a spec­tac­u­larly beau­tiful place. It will be screening at the upcoming Hot Docs film fest­ival here in Toronto, and I’m hopeful that I can get an inter­view with either the dir­ector, Michal Orion Scott, or Rowan’s dad Rupert Isaacson, should either of them make the trip.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Michal Orion Scott and Rowan’s par­ents, Rupert Isaacson and Kristin Neff, from after the screening (the first ques­tion is from a young aut­istic man who was attending the screening with his parents):

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 14:08

Official site of the film

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Enfances (Childhoods)

Enfances (Childhoods) (Directors: Yann Le Gal, Ismaël Ferroukhi, Corinne Garfin, Joana Hadjithomas, Khalil Joreige, Isild Le Besco, Safy Nebbou): This very inter­esting idea, brought to real­iz­a­tion by French dir­ector Yann Le Gal, brings together six short films, each con­cerning a pivotal moment in the child­hood of six great film dir­ectors: Fritz Lang, Orson Welles, Jean Renoir, Jacques Tati, Alfred Hitchcock, and Ingmar Bergman. I hadn’t heard of any of the segment’s dir­ectors before, but three or four of the seg­ments were out­standing. My favourite is the story of how Fritz Lang, at the age of ten, dis­covers a family secret that changes his politics and his whole out­look on life. Also excel­lent was the recol­lec­tion by Jean Renoir of how his friend­ship with a peasant child who teaches him how to hunt and steal gives him an appre­ci­ation for the injustice of class dis­tinc­tions. The seg­ments on Welles and Hitchcock, though good, were per­haps the weakest. But the seg­ment on Jacques Tati was per­haps the closest in spirit to an actual Tati film. The gangly Tati is too tall to fit into his class photo, so he wanders off into the school on an almost word­less adven­ture. The way he ends up in the photo is pure phys­ical comedy. The seg­ment on Bergman rounds out the film, and if I’d been more familiar with his work, I might have appre­ci­ated it more.

I really enjoyed the way each seg­ment not only told a story from the director’s life, but was also dir­ected in their sig­na­ture style. Although these omnibus films are always bound to be uneven, these six stories moved along at a great pace and made for a very enjoy­able (and hope­fully enlight­ening) experience.

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }