From the monthly archives:

December 2007

Army of Shadows (L'Armée des ombres)

Army of Shadows (L’Armée des ombres) (1969, Director: Jean-Pierre Melville): Incredibly, this film was not released in the United States until 2006. As a result, many critics named it among their top films that year, des­pite it being nearly 40 years old. Army of Shadows fol­lows a small group of French Resistance fighters in the middle of the war (1942–1943) as they try to sur­vive in the midst of occu­pied France. Despite its epic length (145 minutes), it feels intimate and grip­ping due mostly to the sparing use of music and dia­logue, and the moody cine­ma­to­graphy that gives the impres­sion that most of the film takes place in twilight.

The entire group dis­play a sort of doomed heroism. We see very little of their actual res­ist­ance work, since they always seem to be on the run, hiding out, wor­rying about informers or get­ting arrested. It’s not that they’re inept, it’s just that the crushing para­noia makes it dif­fi­cult to operate. The atmo­sphere of claus­tro­phobia is per­vasive from the first frame to the last. Even amongst them­selves, there’s very little affec­tion or humour. It’s as if their humanity has been reduced to just the instinct to sur­vive. And to do that requires trusting other people, which is perilous.

Despite the set­ting, this is far from an action movie. It’s more of an anxiety movie, with every moment holding the pos­sib­ility of danger. And in the end, it’s an incred­ibly sad film. These are good people, reduced to the simplest forms of right and wrong by a greater evil. Their phys­ical sur­vival is far from assured, but the hope that their humanity can remain intact makes this a very dif­ferent kind of thriller.

Buy from Amazon.ca

Buy from Amazon.com

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Commune

by James McNally on December 23, 2007 · 1 comment

in DVD, Documentaries

Commune

Commune (Director: Jonathan Berman): Black Bear Ranch is 300 acres of land which was pur­chased in 1968 by a group of “hip­pies” who wanted to live com­mun­ally. They raised the $22,000 to pur­chase the land by soli­citing dona­tions from musi­cians like Frank Zappa, The Monkees and The Doors. Jonathan Berman’s film uses archival footage and present-day inter­views with many of the people who chose to abandon what they felt was a cor­rupt American society to try some­thing new.

All of us have heard stories about “hip­pies living in com­munes,” but this is a mostly clear-eyed look at what it was really like. The coun­ter­cul­ture of the 1960s was a mish­mash of dozens of dif­ferent causes, polit­ical move­ments, and reli­gious explor­a­tions, not to men­tion people who were just curious or lonely. What happened when a group of people came together under the slogan “free land for free people” was per­haps pre­dict­able in hind­sight, but in the heady days of coun­ter­cul­tural revolu­tion, they thought any­thing was pos­sible. We meet sev­eral mem­or­able char­ac­ters, prin­cip­ally Richard Marley, who with his wife Elsa was one of the founders of the com­mune. Already in his mid-30s at the time, he might have thought of him­self as a father figure. He’d been a labour organ­izer and was dis­ap­pointed that these ideal­istic young­sters didn’t seem to want to be organ­ized at all. Despite that, he and Elsa decided to stay and see what these “anarch­ists” might teach them. A remark­ably resi­lient com­munity grew out of these humble begin­nings, and though it’s not com­pletely clear from the film, Black Bear Ranch still func­tions in many ways as a com­munity for altern­ative living.

Not that there weren’t a lot of bumps along the way. The group grew beyond Richard and Elsa’s expect­a­tions, and nobody ever really asked what they hoped to achieve. People came to Black Bear for dif­ferent reasons, and because human nature never really changes, idealism was accom­panied by a lot of blind spots and hypo­crisy. There were issues of sexism, racism and classism which were touched on, but I was hoping the film would be more insightful here. Why, for instance, did everyone seem to be white? Why did they all seem to come from affluent homes? The phys­ical labour required in this kind of “back to the land” homesteading revealed men and women reverting back to their tra­di­tional gender roles at first, which caused some con­tro­versy. Soon enough, women were out cut­ting wood with the men. But des­pite that, their exper­i­ments in com­munal par­enting and free love seemed to end in miser­able failure, and many couples even­tu­ally moved away to find schools for their chil­dren. More explor­a­tion of why they thought things went wrong would have helped the film here.

One chilling incident occurred in 1979, when the com­mune invited an itin­erant group called the Shiva Lila to join them. The Shiva Lila had all the trap­pings of a cult, fol­lowing the teach­ings of one man, drop­ping lots of acid and wor­ship­ping chil­dren. After a while, the ori­ginal Black Bear inhab­it­ants had to ask them to leave, a sobering real­iz­a­tion for people who thought everyone could get along.

Human beings are end­lessly ideal­istic, but we are also petty, jealous, power-hungry, lustful, lazy and self-righteous. Jonathan Berman’s film provides a look into the muddled and beau­tiful mess that was the 60s coun­ter­cul­ture. Listening to people with col­ourful names like Cedar, Mahaj, Wakan, Osha, Creek, and Kenoli made me smile. Sure, they were a bit too optim­istic, but they actu­ally went out and tried to live their idealism. It was heart­ening to see that many of these rainbow war­riors are still involved in com­munity act­ivism and social justice, but they’re wistful about those years when it looked like they might actu­ally be able to change the whole world. Perhaps the com­munes of the 21st cen­tury won’t look like Black Bear Ranch, but the people who lived there still have a lot to teach us.

Buy Commune from Amazon.ca

Buy Commune from Amazon.com

Black Bear Ranch web site

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

I’ve just heard about the passing of NOW’s long­time film critic John Harkness. I never had the oppor­tunity to meet John, but his reviews have been a staple in the pages of NOW since its incep­tion in 1981. He also con­trib­uted art­icles to Sight and Sound and Take One, as well as writing for the Cinematheque Ontario pro­gramme guides. Over the years, I’ve absorbed thou­sands of his carefully-chosen words and I hope at least a little of his talent has rubbed off. He will be sorely missed by the film com­munity in Toronto and far beyond.

His friend and fellow critic Norm Wilner has a more per­sonal remembrance.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

In Bruges

I’d read about dir­ector Martin McDonagh’s upcoming fea­ture In Bruges a few weeks ago, and was intrigued by the set­ting (I’ve spend long stretches here on both my back­packing trips around Europe in the late 1980s) and the casting (Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Ralph Fiennes). Now the trailer is up and I’m con­vinced this will be a winner.

I’ve never been much of a Colin Farrell fan, but here he gets to play a Dublin hitman sent to a Belgian tourist town after a botched hit. The accents and dia­logue are spot-on and the humour in the trailer prom­ises to make this a unique spin on the hitman genre.

By the way, the trailer is hosted on Film in Focus, a new advertorial site from Focus Features that actu­ally fea­tures a lot of great content.

In Bruges Trailer

P.S. Martin McDonagh is actu­ally much better-known as a play­wright, and I remember seeing his play The Lonesome West back in 2002 and having a very mixed reac­tion to it.

P.P.S. Watching this trailer brought back memories of another great Irish mob film with Brendan Gleeson called I Went Down. Inexplicably, it’s not avail­able on DVD. It was briefly released in Region 4 (Australia) but is now out of print. Considering that this was the highest-grossing Irish film at the time of its release (1997), its unavail­ab­ility seems crim­inal, if you’ll pardon the expression.

UPDATE (January 4, 2008): I’ve just learned that the film will be the Opening Night present­a­tion at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, so we shouldn’t have to wait too long to hear what the reviewers there thought of it.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association has announced the Golden Globe nom­in­a­tions for 2007. Of course, due to the ongoing writers’ strike, there is a very real pos­sib­ility that there will be no awards show this year.

Nevertheless, this is the start of the awards season for real. I’m eager to see Atonement, Charlie Wilson’s War and There Will Be Blood, and I think I shouldn’t have missed Michael Clayton. I hope to see all of them before the Oscars, though.

What do you think of this list? Any sur­prises? Any omissions?

{ Comments on this entry are closed }