May 2006

In a Soldier's Footsteps

In a Soldier’s Footsteps (Denmark, 2005, Director: Mette Zeruneith, 89 minutes): Truth really is stranger than fic­tion. When we first meet Steven Ndugga in 1999, he’s a per­son­able and artic­u­late refugee living in Denmark who approaches the film­makers wanting to have his story told. A former child sol­dier, he escaped Uganda with his life, but lost his wife and son. Years later, during the filming of this doc­u­mentary, he receives inform­a­tion that his son is still alive, and is in fact now a child sol­dier him­self. After Steven returns to Uganda to find his son, he dis­ap­pears. Over the next five years, he reappears and then dis­ap­pears again, and the story just keeps get­ting stranger. Like a Graham Greene novel, the film finds the truth elu­sive, but it makes a fas­cin­ating tale.

Article about the film on the Danish Film Institute web site

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Extraordinary Story of the New York Cosmos

Once in a Lifetime: The Extraordinary Story of the New York Cosmos (USA/UK, 2006, Director: Paul Crowder and John Downer, 97 minutes): The North American Soccer League was strug­gling along through the 1970s until the New York Cosmos, owned by Warner Communications head Steve Ross, decided to bring super­star Pele to the Big Apple. Suddenly, attend­ance was up, and the Cosmos started win­ning. Continuing the for­mula by bringing some European stars over, the Cosmos won sev­eral league titles over the next few years. In the pro­cess, the once-moribund NASL expanded quickly to 24 teams. Unfortunately, the res­ulting dilu­tion of talent, and the inab­ility of smaller-market clubs to pay the huge salaries demanded by European or Latin American stars, meant that the league soon imploded.

The film tells the story with humour and verve, and it’s hard not to be a little bit nos­talgic for the days when 70,000 people would crowd into Giants sta­dium to watch “the other foot­ball.” But ulti­mately, the Cosmos’ strategy was short-sighted. Building an audi­ence for soccer in North America was going to take time, and the free-spending style of Ross and the Cosmos attracted only fair­weather fans, who would melt away as soon as the team stopped win­ning. Other fran­chises couldn’t attract enough fans in the first place, and the league suffered as a result.

It was inter­esting that the dir­ector admitted after­wards that he is a huge fan of Chelsea Football Club in the English Premiership. Chelsea are fol­lowing a sim­ilar strategy at the moment, with the seem­ingly end­less bil­lions of owner Roman Abramovich funding the con­struc­tion of another super­team. So far, they’ve won back to back titles in England, but to the det­ri­ment of the league, according to many observers. Without a salary cap, the English Premier League drains talent away from the rest of the world, and Chelsea are the richest club of all. This con­cen­tra­tion of talent makes the game less com­pet­itive in the long term, and while it may attract a few new fans, they’re not the sort of fans who will stick around if and when the team starts losing.

Many of the American innov­a­tions brought to the game by the NASL have made it into the game in the rest of the world. For example, pen­alty shootouts to decide games tied after reg­u­la­tion time. This will always be unpop­ular with foot­ball pur­ists, but for the casual fan, it cer­tainly adds excite­ment to the game. Other gim­micks weren’t so suc­cessful, thank­fully. Who wants to see cheer­leaders at a foot­ball match?

The only flaw in the film was the absence of any present-day inter­views with Pele or Johan Cruyff (who played for the Los Angeles Aztecs and Washington Diplomats fran­chises), though I believe numerous attempts were made to obtain their par­ti­cip­a­tion. The dir­ector Paul Crowder prom­ised lots of fun stuff in the DVD extras, including their attempts to get Pele on board.

An inter­esting art­icle on the editing of the film

Official site of the New York Cosmos

Wikipedia entry on the New York Cosmos

Information on the NASL from the National Soccer Hall of Fame

The American Soccer History Archives

The NASL Alumni Association arranged a reunion for more than 60 former players in September 2005.

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Fuck

Fuck (USA, 2006, Director: Steve Anderson, 93 minutes): The premise was prom­ising. A film that would take a look at this most offensive of words, from both a lib­eral and con­ser­vative per­spective. But des­pite the many talking heads, the film ulti­mately doesn’t say much. Except “fuck”. More than 600 times.

This was an enter­taining film, but ulti­mately not an enlight­ening one, and that frus­trated me. Despite the pres­ence of both “lib­erals” (Hunter S. Thompson, Drew Carey, Janeane Garofalo, Bill Maher) and con­ser­vat­ives (Alan Keyes, Pat Boone, Michael Medved, “Miss Manners”), the film def­in­itely skewed to the anti-censorship camp. And that’s too bad, because although I’m not pro-censorship, there were def­in­itely issues that could have and should have been explored. Instead, all of the con­ser­vat­ives came across as a little bit loony. As well, the film takes a tan­gent into the area of por­no­graphy, with porn stars Ron Jeremy and Tera Patrick on board to remind us that fuck means “to have sex.” And then to show us. This seemed a bit gra­tu­itous to me.

The truth is that people use the f-bomb because it is trans­gressive. And at the same time, it’s becoming less and less trans­gressive all the time as it per­meates our cul­ture. Despite the pres­ence of sev­eral aca­demics, nobody talked about why we use lan­guage this way, and what hap­pens when it loses this sort of power. Pat Boone briefly talked about how rap lyrics debase women, but nobody responded to that. Since another film I saw this week (Beyond Beats) took that issue on without coming across as pro-censorship, this failure to address an important issue seemed glaring to me. Especially since the over­whelming majority of the por­trayals we saw in this film were of men using the word to threaten or belittle or dis­miss someone else. I’m not an uptight joy­less con­ser­vative, but I do think the film could still have been fun while addressing some real lan­guage and cul­tural issues.

The most inter­esting thing in the film for me was when Janeane Garofalo admitted that the HBO pro­gram Deadwood had too many f-words for her, that she found it excessive. To me, that was some­thing that needed fur­ther explan­a­tion, and I wanted to hear what the other “lib­erals” thought about it as well. After fighting for free speech, and win­ning, then what? Certainly the comedians would hit a dry patch. All of the comedy bits were from the 1960s to the 1980s, which I thought was telling. It’s just not as shocking any­more when every­body says it. Drew Carey joked at the end, “When’s the cunt movie coming out?” which tells you that he gets it.

The dir­ector him­self said after the film that even he’s not neces­sarily pro­moting the idea that people should be able to say fuck on net­work tele­vi­sion or radio, but that he thinks the dis­cus­sion is important. It’s just too bad that that didn’t come across so well in the fin­ished film.

7/10(7/10)

EYE Weekly: ** (out of 5) (review)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The World According To Sesame Street

The World According To Sesame Street (USA, 2005, Director: Linda Goldstein Knowlton and Linda Hawkins, 105 minutes): Sesame Street has proven to be a very suc­cessful American export, now being seen in more than 120 coun­tries. This film looks at the very unique pro­cess of estab­lishing co-productions with local edu­cators, pro­du­cers and pup­pet­eers, focusing on two chal­len­ging loc­a­tions: Kosovo and Bangladesh.

By far the most time is spent on the Bangladeshi pro­duc­tion, and the real star of the film is Sesame Workshop pro­ducer Nadia Zylstra, who began her job three weeks before filming began. We follow this very excit­able South African woman as she begins the pro­cess of defining what the pro­gram will look like in Bangladesh. The film shows us the nuts and bolts of how the pro­duc­tion comes together, and some of the chal­lenges involved when dealing with local oppos­i­tion and delays.

I enjoyed the film and found it very inspiring, but I think it missed a chance to dig a bit deeper into the issue of what some audi­ence mem­bers called “cul­tural imper­i­alism.” Though they’re very careful to “partner” with local people, the Sesame Street organ­iz­a­tion is still American and fuelled by American values and defin­i­tions of suc­cess. Some of the ques­tions sur­rounding the “export” of an American model would have been very inter­esting to explore.

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

His Big White Self

His Big White Self (UK, 2006, Director: Nick Broomfield, 94 minutes): I’m a bit sheepish to admit that this is the first Nick Broomfield doc­u­mentary that I’ve seen. From what I’ve heard, Broomfield was one of the first doc­u­mentary film­makers to insert him­self into the nar­rative, and like Michael Moore, he can some­times be more of a dis­trac­tion than necessary.

This film is a com­panion piece to his 1991 film The Leader, His Driver, and the Driver’s Wife, which was a por­trait of South African white suprem­acist leader Eugene Terreblanche. It would be a good idea to see that film first, I think, since this film refers to many events from the earlier film. In the 1990s, after the col­lapse of apartheid, Terreblanche’s group, the Afrikaner Resistance Movement (the Afrikaans acronym is AWB), was respons­ible for a rash of bomb­ings that killed sev­eral people. His fol­lowers also viol­ently dis­rupted gath­er­ings of the ANC and other polit­ical oppon­ents, and even­tu­ally, Terreblanche faced prison time for some of these crimes (as well as for some more per­sonal mis­deeds, like assault and attempted murder). Ridiculously, he serves only three years in prison, and Broomfield returns in 2004 just as he is being released, hoping to inter­view him again.

As a side note, in the first film, he never sits for a formal inter­view and Broomfield is reduced to chasing him around trying to pro­voke con­front­a­tions. In the same vein, this time Terreblanche refuses to meet the film crew for an inter­view (and in fact is pro­hib­ited from con­ducting polit­ical inter­views as part of his parole), so Broomfield ends up dis­guising him­self and pre­tending to be seeking an inter­view regarding a book of poetry Terreblanche has coming out. While these scenes are both funny and tense, it means the “inter­view” itself is pretty devoid of mean­ingful state­ments from The Leader.

Most of the inter­esting inter­views are with the Driver of the first film, J.P. Meyer. An affable man now into his six­ties, J.P. seems to really like Broomfield. But just when the audi­ence is warming to him, he spouts some racist non­sense. Men like Meyer are piti­able even in their hatred. Desperate to hold onto their white priv­ilege, and cloaking it in reli­gious lan­guage, they’re now growing old as bitter men.

His Big White Self

Terreblanche is a fas­cin­ating char­acter. A fiery orator who has based much of his move­ment and man­ner­isms on the German National Socialist (Nazi) Party, he con­stantly paints him­self as a victim, and even though mel­lower now, is still con­vinced that his cause is right.

The film was hugely enjoy­able but slighly flawed for two reasons. First, it really can’t be judged apart from the first film, which I haven’t seen (and which doesn’t appear to be widely avail­able; it’s not even on DVD here in North America). Secondly, Broomfield’s dis­com­fort is played mostly for laughs. The AWB at the zenith of its power had half a mil­lion mem­bers out of a white pop­u­la­tion of four mil­lion. Even with some of their car­toonish fas­cist pos­turing, they were a dan­gerous and violent group. Even though Broomfield speaks of receiving death threats after the first film, you don’t get the sense of danger in this one. Perhaps the AWB’s power really has dis­ap­peared. But when you see how little has changed in some parts of the coun­tryside, you’re left feeling not so sure.

Visit the director’s web site

More on the film from England’s Channel 4

Transcript of a webchat con­ducted after the film aired on England’s Channel 4

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }