June 2007

Ratatouille

Ratatouille (Director: Brad Bird, USA, 2007): My first thought upon seeing an anim­ated rat cooking in the kit­chen of a French res­taurant was “Wow! I hope this film can get kids inter­ested in good food.” So I hope we don’t end up seeing Ratatouille Happy Meals at McDonald’s. Seriously, although the main theme of the film was being “true to your­self” or some­thing like that, I was just impressed that a film aimed at kids would take the risk of trying to bring some­thing adult and exotic (and some would say snobby) within their reach. Especially at a time when the food offered to the majority of us is so bland and unhealthy.

As always, Pixar have out­done them­selves. I skipped Cars after hearing a few less-than-stellar reviews, but am glad I saw this. The atten­tion to detail is simply stun­ning, and the food looks real enough that I could almost smell and taste it. Thomas Keller, of Napa des­tin­a­tion The French Laundry, was a con­sultant on the film and it shows. (Maybe The French Laundry could offer Ratatouille Happy Meals. It would be great if they could get the price under $100. Ok, not funny.)

Food blogger Meg Hourihan and her hus­band Jason Kottke have both posted better reviews than mine, so I’ll stop here. Besides, I’m sud­denly a little bit hungry…

P.S. As someone who works in the wine busi­ness, it was funny to see the very spe­cial 1961 Château Latour at the heart of a key scene.

Official site for the film

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Boss Of It All (Direktøren for det hele)

The Boss Of It All (Direktøren for det hele) (Director: Lars von Trier, Denmark, 2006): After a string of ser­ious and polit­ical films, Danish bad boy Lars von Trier has dir­ected what he describes as a “harm­less” comedy. Ravn, the owner of an IT firm, is inter­ested in selling his com­pany to an Icelandic busi­nessman (a clever cameo by Icelandic dir­ector Fridrik Thor Fridriksson), but for the past ten years has pre­tended that the actual owner (“the boss of it all”) lives in America. It’s a ruse that has allowed him to blame all the hard decisions on the absent owner and take all the credit for any suc­cesses him­self. But now he needs to pro­duce this phantom in order to sign the deal, so he hires Kristoffer, an out-of-work actor whose self-importance is com­ic­ally out­sized com­pared to his talent. The hijinks begin when the company’s employees catch a glimpse of the man they’ve been waiting ten years to meet.

At first, it’s easy to snow the employees with busi­ness dou­blespeak, but soon he finds out that Ravn has been sending emails to them over the years posing as “the boss of it all” and he’s neg­lected to tell Kristoffer who’s been told which lie. Within a few days, he’s been seduced by one employee, punched by another, and engaged to a third. As the scheme spirals out of both men’s con­trol, the Icelanders return to seal the deal.

At this point, Kristoffer dis­covers that Ravn’s plan is to sell the com­pany, lay off all the employees, and profit from intel­lec­tual prop­erty that is not his to sell. Kristoffer’s ini­tial solu­tion threatens a form of infinite regress, with him blaming an absent “boss of the boss of it all.” Fortunately, he changes tac­tics, but just as we think he is going to show some moral courage, his actor’s ego over­whelms him.

The film plays a bit like a Shakespearean comedy, in that dir­ector von Trier inserts him­self into the film as nar­rator at sev­eral points, explaining what is coming up or what has just happened. And as a script, it’s clever and fre­quently hil­arious. The actors are also well-chosen, with the two leads espe­cially well-cast. The problem for me is that as a film, it isn’t visu­ally inter­esting. At this point, I need to insert some­thing about Automavision™, “a prin­ciple for shooting film (and recording the sound) developed with the inten­tion of lim­iting human influ­ence by inviting chance in from the cold and thus giving the work an ‘idea­less’ sur­face free of the force of habit and aes­thetics.” What this means is that after the cine­ma­to­grapher chooses a camera pos­i­tion and aper­ture, a com­puter algorithm off­sets it so that each shot achieves a kind of ran­dom­ness. In prac­tice, it was slightly dis­tracting, and cer­tainly didn’t add any­thing to a visu­ally unin­spired film.

There are a lot of jokes made in the film at the expense of the “artistic” theatre actor, but in this case, The Boss Of It All might just be more at home on an actual stage.

UPDATE: The film opens in Toronto on July 13.

Official site for the film

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Groundhoppers

by James McNally on June 21, 2007

in Documentaries,DVD

Groundhoppers

Groundhoppers (Director: Eivind Tolås, Norway, 2005): Thank good­ness for the internet. While reading about obsessive foot­ball (soccer) fans who attempt to visit as many foot­ball grounds as pos­sible, I came across the title of this Norwegian doc­u­mentary. I was able to get in touch with the film­maker and con­vince him to send me a copy to review. As far as I know, this film was broad­cast on Norwegian tele­vi­sion, and played a few film fest­ivals in Europe, but has never been seen in North America. But that’s ok, for the phe­nomenon of “ground­hop­ping” prob­ably wouldn’t make as much sense here.

Kjell Morten and Bjarte are two middle-aged brothers who spend all of their vaca­tions in England, attending foot­ball matches. Their goal is to visit all 92 grounds of the teams that com­prise the Football League. This includes the Premiership (20 teams), the Championship (24 teams) and Leagues One and Two (24 teams each), which together com­prise the top four tiers of English foot­ball. As you can ima­gine, “ground­hop­pers” are usu­ally men, usu­ally single, and have a cer­tain amount of time and dis­pos­able income at their command.

The two Norwegians have been at it for more than ten years, and are up to sixty-odd stadia vis­ited. Perhaps stadia is too grand a term, for some of the lower league clubs play in some very modest cir­cum­stances indeed. Basing them­selves in Rotherham, “one of Britain’s poorest cities” according to the film, they’ve adopted the local team, Rotherham United, nick­named the Millers as their home team away from home.

At home in Bergen, though, it’s all about SK Brann, and one of the film’s most charming moments comes watching the brothers as they wit­ness their team’s tri­umph in Norway’s own Cup Final.

All in all, this is a light-hearted look at a harm­less (if inex­plic­able to most) obses­sion. I think if I had the advant­ages of living in Europe (gen­erous vaca­tion allow­ances, short dis­tances, cheap trans­port­a­tion, and a wealth of foot­ball clubs), I’d be joining the boys in the stands.

I have attended foot­ball matches in three dif­ferent coun­tries, though: Canada, Uruguay, and Slovenia. Just a few hun­dred more to go…

More on Rotherham United FC (the Millers)
More on SK Brann
Groundtastic, a magazine devoted to foot­ball grounds
Football Grounds In Focus, The No.1 Groundhopping web­site ‘made for trav­el­lers by trav­el­lers’
Done The Lot — Fans who have vis­ited all 92 English Football League grounds

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Akira

by James McNally on June 20, 2007

in DVD

Akira

Akira (Director: Katsuhiro Ôtomo, Japan, 1988): Ok, I know I’m not going to be able to do this film justice. It’s tough when you put some­thing into the DVD player at 10:00pm. Sometimes a long movie just feels longer when it’s after mid­night and you’re lying hori­zont­ally on the couch. Like many Japanese anime, Akira was based on a longer manga series, which may explain why there seemed to be a lot of plot jumps that force you to fill things in on your own. When the film was released in 1988, the anim­a­tion was con­sidered cutting-edge, and although there has been a lot of innov­a­tion in the almost twenty years since, the film’s visuals still have the ability to amaze.

Set in 2019, more than thirty years after World War III has des­troyed the old city of Tokyo, the film tells a com­plic­ated story of a secret gov­ern­ment pro­ject designed to develop powerful psychic powers in chil­dren. When Tetsuo, a young member of a biker gang, stumbles across one of the escaped chil­dren, he is abducted by shadowy mil­itary forces and sub­jected to exper­i­ments which unleash his latent psychic powers. His friend Kaneda becomes involved when he tries to rescue Tetsuo and by the end of the film’s 124 minutes, there is a lot of carnage and gen­eral mayhem.

I’ll have to admit that I found the plot con­fusing, and the film over­long. In gen­eral, I’ve found anime’s plots fairly pre­dict­able (while at the same time mad­den­ingly vague), and Akira may have set the standard. Having recently reviewed Paprika, though, I found that a few of Akira’s scenes were just as spec­tac­ular, and I sus­pect that most anime have bor­rowed from Akira in some way or another over the years. For a film that’s almost twenty years old, the anim­a­tion still feels fresh and in a world of CGI and twenty years of copycat films, that’s quite an accomplishment.

I know this film has a lot of ded­ic­ated fans, so I’m hoping some of you will chime in with some insights in the comments.

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Danish Poet
The Danish Poet

Tonight’s pro­gramme con­sisted of award-winning shorts released in 2006, and just watching them one after another led me to a few con­clu­sions about short films in gen­eral. To com­pare them to written works, they’re a bit like poems to a fea­ture film’s novel. And to com­pare to spoken word, they’re like jokes as opposed to sagas. With such a short amount of time, they need to make their points quickly, so there is often a high “clev­erness” factor and the end­ings often feel like the punch line of a joke. This can work well, but a film that stands out is one that doesn’t make these tropes so obvious. Here, in my order of enjoy­ment, are tonight’s selections:

  • The Danish Poet (Canada/Norway, 2006): With lovely nar­ra­tion from Liv Ullmann, this story felt the most organic and the least gim­micky. Even though there is a sort of punch­line “payoff” at the end, it’s tele­graphed early enough to set us down gently. The whim­sical anim­a­tion style and always-great use of anim­ated (but non-speaking) animals made this a worthy Oscar-winner this year. Check out the film’s web site. (9/10)
  • Dreams and Desires — Family Ties (UK, 2006): Another anim­ated short, this one clev­erly used anim­ated sketches to sim­u­late a wed­ding video filmed by the oddly cinephilic Beryl, a large woman of grand­moth­erly vin­tage. Her attempts to film the dis­astrous occa­sion in the styles of famous dir­ectors from Eistenstein to Riefenstahl, all the while keeping up a steady stream-of-consciousness nar­ra­tion, keeps this one rol­licking along, des­pite the nearly impen­et­rable accents. (9/10)
  • Tanghi Argentini (Belgium, 2006): This is a charming tale of an office drone who just might be an angel. André needs to learn to tango in two weeks so he can meet his Internet crush, so he turns to his col­league Frans to help teach him to dance. Will love bloom? (8/10)
  • Contact (Raak) (Netherlands, 2006): Three char­ac­ters paths cross again and again in this cleverly-edited short. There’s that word “clever” again. (7/10)
  • The Substitute (Il Supplente) (Italy, 2006): A class of high-school stu­dents is ter­ror­ized by a Scott Thompson (ex-Kids in the Hall) lookalike, who then gets his comeup­pance. Funny in an odd sort of way. (7/10)
  • Make A Wish (Atmenah) (USA, 2006): A straight­for­ward, almost documentary-like tale of a young girl who will go to any lengths to get a spe­cial birthday cake. Only it’s set in the West Bank. The film­making is pretty rudi­mentary and there’s a bit of a (tragic) punch­line at the end. (6/10)
  • Imagine This (Australia/Ireland, 2006): Sometimes a short should also be a “small.” Using found internet footage to make George W. Bush “sing” John Lennon’s “Imagine” was a pretty funny idea. But it really shouldn’t have made it off the YouTube site. (5/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }