#hotdocs09

Objectified
This is a very late leftover from Hot Docs but I’m posting it now because I want to give people access to the recorded Q&A as well as to let you know that you can buy the film on DVD and Blu-ray from the offi­cial site.

Objectified (Director: Gary Hustwit): Gary Hustwit was always going to have a hard time fol­lowing up Helvetica. The sheer nov­elty of a doc­u­mentary exam­in­a­tion of a typeface would be hard to top. Instead, Objectified simply takes the first film’s approach and broadens the view­finder. Instead of looking at pieces of text, Hustwit aims his camera at the everyday objects around us. Who designs them, and what goes into the process?

As in the first film, the cam­er­a­work is fant­astic, teasing out gor­geous details in objects we often take for granted. And the inter­views are just as solid and cover a fair spec­trum of design philo­sophies. It’s no longer a nov­elty, but the film is solid and enjoy­able. And it hints at the larger issues that trouble the best designers. That is, do we really need more stuff? What good is a beautifully-designed object that just ends up in a land­fill some­where? I would have liked to dig even deeper into these issues but I do think Hustwit makes a real effort to address the run­away con­sumerism that is the under­lying problem with design fetishism.

I have to draw par­tic­ular atten­tion to the exem­plary job Hustwit does of building a com­munity around his films. His use of the web to pro­mote and sell his work is nothing short of amazing, and if he ever decides to stop making films him­self, I think he has another career teaching film­makers how to con­nect with their audiences.

That being said, I have no desire for him to stop making such beau­tiful and thought-provoking films. He’s prom­ised to wrap up his design tri­logy with his next film, though he’s given no hints yet about the film’s sub­ject. But I can say with con­fid­ence that if you liked the first two, you’re sure to enjoy the next one.

Official site of the film

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Gary Hustwit from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 19:20

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

When We Were Boys

When We Were Boys (Director: Sarah Goodman): I was a big fan of Sarah Goodman’s first film Army of One (review) which premiered at Hot Docs in 2004 and so when I saw she had another film at Hot Docs, I was eager to see it. Unfortunately, it’s taken me sev­eral weeks longer than anti­cip­ated to finally sit down and watch it.

When We Were Boys is a vérité por­trait of a private boys’ school here in Toronto, and it par­tic­u­larly focuses on the friend­ship between two boys. Noah is sens­itive and polite, a good stu­dent and a standout in the choir. Colin is louder, more ram­bunc­tious, able to charm his teachers into let­ting him get away with things. We pick up the story in Grade 8, with the boys razzing each other while playing video­games. As Goodman’s camera fol­lows them over the next year, we become immersed in the barely-controlled chaos that is school. Despite the boys’ priv­ilege, they are just as ener­getic and rest­less as any other kids at that age. Many of them try to manip­u­late and charm their teachers, which although it hap­pens else­where, seems par­tic­u­larly men­acing given that within ten years, most of these kids will make more money than their teachers ever will. It’s hard to determine whether their sense of enti­tle­ment is just part of their gen­er­a­tion or whether it has any­thing to do with their fam­ilies’ wealth. Goodman begins the film with a long shot of the pro­ces­sion of expensive cars that drop their sons off each morning, and it very clearly makes the point that these boys are spe­cial. Their teachers drive the point home repeatedly as well, that they have great respons­ib­il­ities to go with their priv­ilege, but of course the mes­sage is lost on 13-year-old boys.

As the film fol­lows the boys into Grade 9, some of the minor char­ac­ters drop into the back­ground even fur­ther as it becomes apparent that Noah is being ostra­cized for some reason. It’s never clear exactly why he’s no longer pop­ular, although it could have some­thing to do with the fact that other stu­dents seem to think his family is wealthier than the rest of them. Noah takes it stoic­ally, but some of the shots of him sit­ting alone at lunch or walking home are heart­breaking. His rejec­tion by Colin is espe­cially painful to watch.

But then sud­denly, the film skips another year into the future, and Noah and Colin are back in Noah’s base­ment playing video­games together. Noah tent­at­ively asks Colin what happened, but doesn’t get an answer. That’s sort of the pos­i­tion the viewer is put in, as well. Goodman has beau­ti­fully cap­tured the energy and shifting alle­gi­ances of boys at this age, but there’s very little sense of the boys’ inner lives. By picking boys rather than girls, she’s staked out par­tic­u­larly dif­fi­cult ter­rain. Boys hardly talk to anyone about what’s going on in their heads at this age, never mind doc­u­mentary film­makers. So all we can see is their out­ward beha­viour, which is guarded and superficial.

The end result is that the viewer is left to pro­ject his own remem­brances of adoles­cence onto the boys. The soundtrack almost encour­ages this, helping the film feel nos­talgic even as events are hap­pening. Ultimately, though, that didn’t feel sat­is­fying to me. Noah seems like a very inter­esting char­acter, and there is one scene where he talks some­what freely to his barber about the expect­a­tions being put on him, but for me that was almost a tease. I sup­pose that wanting to know things the boys them­selves may not know is put­ting unreal­istic expect­a­tions on the film, but I can’t deny that I am still left wanting some­thing more.

Official site of the film

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Steel Homes

Steel Homes (Director: Eva Weber): I’m not in the habit of reviewing shorts, but as it hap­pens, I ran into the dir­ector of Steel Homes at a Hot Docs party and she eagerly pressed a copy of her film into my hand. The reason I usu­ally don’t review shorts has nothing to do with the per­ceived quality of the films, and everything to do with my per­ceived lack of talent at writing about them. Nevertheless, here I go.

Eva Weber has taken a look inside a self-storage facility and has asked some ques­tions. What kinds of people keep their stuff here? Why do they do it? Why are there some things we can’t keep with us and yet can’t throw away? In ten short minutes, the film eleg­antly attempts to answer these ques­tions by means of a per­ceptive camera moving at a stately pace, accom­panied by voi­ceovers from some of the ten­ants who rent lockers. These anonymous-looking build­ings have popped up all over the developed world, places to store the over­flow of “stuff” that we acquire during our life­times. But what emerges is that people aren’t just keeping excess material goods here. In many cases, they’re con­structing shrines to lost rel­at­ives or even to their own lost youth or ideals. In one case, a man has lost his home and is storing things here until he can get back on his feet again. His shrine is to a lost life as well, per­haps the life of the man he thought he could be.

By focusing only on the ster­ility of the facility itself, and never on the human objects it con­tains, the cine­ma­to­graphy is super­fi­cially dis­tan­cing, but it only makes the voi­ceovers more heart­breaking. As these very artic­u­late sub­jects recount their attempts to grasp immor­tality by hanging onto a person or a memory, the images rein­force the futility of that quest.

Perhaps the best thing I can say about this short doc­u­mentary is that it left me wanting more.

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Sarcastic thanks are in order to doc blogger Pamela Cohn, who has dragged me into a blog­ging meme based on this year’s Hot Docs fest­ival. As if I haven’t done enough writing about it already (and with another five reviews or so still boun­cing around in my head), here goes:

  1. Film that Tugged at My Heartstrings the Most: This one’s a tie: Aron Gaudet’s The Way We Get By and Greg Barker’s Sergio. In fact, these two knocked me out so thor­oughly that I’ve been unable to write about them yet. I hope that will change, but I’m finding it very dif­fi­cult to put into words how each of these films made me feel. To sum up poorly, both made me think about how what we do with our time on this planet has a lot to do with how we will be remembered. And that each of us very much wants to be remembered.
  2. Strangest Cinematic Moment: Even though I watched it at home via screener, there came a point in John Maringouin’s Big River Man where I thought that the unhinging of Slovenian dis­tance swimmer Martin Strel’s mind might just take mine with it.
  3. Best Party: The day job kind of pre­cluded my full immer­sion in the night­time scene, but luckily my pal Joel Heller (pro­ducer of the hil­arious and utterly charming Winnebago Man) invited me to a couple of post-screening gath­er­ings. I was at the infamous Conference Room F party while it was still coales­cing in Joel’s suite. I got to meet some amazing people (including, finally, the above-mentioned meme-tagger her­self!) even though I could only stay an hour.
  4. Overall High Point: Probably for me, the final post-Winnebago Man party on Saturday night. There was a rumoured trip to Toronto Island that didn’t come off, but I had a great time at the Victory Café instead and got to meet some really inter­esting people. I did skip the post-party karaoke, which was prob­ably best for everyone.
  5. Favourite Pitch: You see, this is where I show how much of an imposter I really am. I did not attend the Toronto Documentary Forum, the Dragon’s Den of doc­u­mentary pitching, and there­fore I have no opinion on this at all. Hopefully after my exper­i­ence at SIFT in a few weeks, I’ll know a good pitch from a bad one (and hoping mine won’t be one of the bad ones!)

Now, I’m sup­posed to tag another five people who can con­tinue this thing. Unlucky vic­tims: Bob Turnbull, Shannon Ridler, Trista DeVries, Sarah Gopaul and Kurt Halfyard.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Inside Hana’s Suitcase

Inside Hana’s Suitcase (Director: Larry Weinstein): Inside Hana’s Suitcase is beau­ti­fully crafted and easily one of the best films at Hot Docs this year. It’s based upon the the inter­na­tion­ally acclaimed book “Hana’s Suitcase” written by Karen Levine.

It’s a holo­caust story but don’t let that fool you into thinking it will be another depressing doc. Through a series of dra­matic re-enactments the film tells the real-life story of two Jewish chil­dren from Czechoslovakia, George and Hana Brady.

Things shift from the 1930s and 1940s world of Czechoslovakia to present-day Japan at the Tokyo Holocaust Museum. A suit­case with the name Hana Brady painted on it is delivered to the museum where Fumiko Ishioka and her stu­dents dis­cover that it came from Auschwitz. They examine the con­tents of the suit­case and learn as much as they can about Hana’s life and the war. Their journey leads to the dis­covery that Hana’s brother George is alive and living in Toronto. From there the story con­tinues to get more and more interesting.

Throughout the film, chil­dren from around the world tell Hana’s story and the les­sons they’ve learned from her exper­i­ence. I thought this was pure genius because it provides the audi­ence with a child’s per­spective of the war in a way that is powerful and full of hope.

Larry Weinstein’s dir­ec­tion is bril­liant and puts the film in the same league as last year’s Academy Award-winning film, Man On Wire. The period music and spe­cial effects trans­port the viewer back to the war while anim­a­tion of Hana’s draw­ings enrich the moviegoing experience.

Inside Hana’s Suitcase is a film about hope that chil­dren and adults can learn from and enjoy on many dif­ferent levels. I highly recom­mend this film and hope it gets a the­at­rical release.

Update: Inside Hana’s Suitcase was named as one of the top ten audi­ence favour­ites at Hot Docs this year.

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }