Jay Kerr

In Heaven Underground: The Weissensee Jewish Cemetery

In Heaven Underground: The Weissensee Jewish Cemetery (Director: Britta Wauer): In 2007, one of the best films I saw at Hot Docs was Forever, dir­ected by Heddy Honigmann. It’s about the Père-Lachaise cemetery in Paris where so many famous artists and musi­cians are buried. This famous grave­yard is presented as a place that has become a source of inspir­a­tion for living artists.

Fast for­ward to Hot Docs 2011 and one of my favourite films at the fest­ival was about another famous cemetery – the Weissensee Jewish Cemetery in Berlin. It was cre­ated in 1880, covers more than 100 acres, con­tains 115,000 graves and is still being used for burials today.

It’s a mir­acle that the cemetery and its records weren’t des­troyed during the Nazi era. Oddly enough, it was the Cold War that seemed to have the biggest impact on the cemetery. The Berlin Wall made it almost impossible for the Jewish com­munity to access the cemetery for years. It even­tu­ally became over­grown and fell into a state of disrepair.

Today, Weissensee is being restored and is full of life. Britta Wauer’s film cap­tures the beauty, his­tory and import­ance of this enchanting place. People from around the world search the maze of roads and paths in search of family his­tory and rel­at­ives. Others share stories about Weisensee and how it has played a part in their lives. High school stu­dents wander the grounds working on art pro­jects while bird experts tag baby hawks in the primeval forest throughout Weissensee.

The pro­duc­tion value of Wauer’s film is of the highest quality – a nice change from some of the docs that suffer from poor visuals and sound. The cine­ma­to­graphy from Kaspar Köpke cap­tures the beauty and peace­ful­ness of the grounds. Several time-lapse scenes cap­ture the dif­ferent sea­sons, just as you’d see in an episode of BBC’s Planet Earth. Still pho­to­graphs come to life bor­rowing the same 3D effect that was intro­duced in The Kid Stays In The Picture. And of course, the soundtrack is exceptional.

If you missed the film at Hot Docs then you’re in luck. Seventh Art Releasing has acquired the North American rights to In Heaven Underground, and plans a the­at­rical release fol­lowed by a DVD release.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The National Parks Project

The National Parks Project (Directors: Louise Archambault, Keith Behrman and 11 others): What a dis­ap­point­ment. Like most of the audi­ence, I thought The National Parks Project was going to show­case 13 of Canada’s national parks with a homegrown soundtrack. Instead of a typ­ical doc­u­mentary, I felt like I was watching an exper­i­mental film from the 60s.

During the premiere at TIFF Lightbox, a handful of people walked out early. I was tempted to join them a couple of times but I stuck it out till the bitter end. It didn’t help that the old guy beside me was coughing, sneezing, sleeping and passing gas. Another senior down the the aisle was snoring, much to the amuse­ment of the people in front of me. I can only ima­gine that they were des­per­ately looking for some­thing to enter­tain them.

The film is com­prised of 13 short films by dif­ferent dir­ectors. Each film­maker spent five days with three musi­cians exploring a national park in each of the provinces and ter­rit­ories. The idea was for these artists to col­lab­orate and cap­ture their exper­i­ence of the land­scape. It sounds like a great idea on paper but it doesn’t work very well as a film.

How can you not create a stun­ning film to cel­eb­rate Parks Canada’s centen­nial year? I think the problem is that each of the short films is a little too avant-garde. Scrap the heavy metal bass that drones on throughout Gros Morne or the grainy sur­veil­lance camera footage in Night Vision. And don’t get me started on the Goldilocks-like char­acter who passes out after eating some wafer cookies in Mystic Mornings.

I don’t want to sound like the crusty old man who blasted the film­makers during the Q&A so I’ll try to say some­thing pos­itive. There are moments in the film when the exper­i­mental visuals are set aside for some land­scape images that give you a true sense of the park envir­on­ment. The footage of Mingan Archipelago National Park along the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence is stun­ning.

Some of the feed­back on Twitter, imme­di­ately after the Hot Docs premiere con­veys the sense of dis­ap­point­ment others experienced:

Twtr isn’t being kind to National Parks Project. Apparently half the audi­ence left, the other half was asleep

#hot­docs national parks pro­ject epic doc fail. Felt like watching someone failing to know how to pick that low-hanging fruits

National Parks pro­ject is not a nature lover’s doc, unfor­tu­nately. Two hours, not a single money shot. Kept waiting for it. Too bad #hotdocs

National Parks Project is ter­rible. 20–30 walk outs. Self-absorbed outsider’s view of the parks. Shame.

British pho­to­grapher David Noton recently said “for a land­scape pho­to­grapher Canada is heaven, but it’s such a vast country it’s dif­fi­cult to know where to start.” It’s a shame that The National Parks Project didn’t have much in the way of voi­ceover nar­ra­tion, simple maps or stun­ning visuals to show how mag­ni­fi­cent our national parks really are.

Official site of the National Parks Project

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

POM Wonderful Presents: The Greatest Movie Ever Sold

POM Wonderful Presents: The Greatest Movie Ever Sold (Director: Morgan Spurlock): I abso­lutely loved this movie. It was funny, clever and it had the Hot Docs audi­ence buzzing as they left the theatre. People were on their cell­phones telling their friends that they have to see this film. To make this movie-going exper­i­ence even more mem­or­able, there were girls serving POM Wonderful bever­ages in the lobby of Isabel Bader Theatre after the screening.

Morgan Spurlock, the man behind Super Size Me is back with a film that seems to be a real crowd pleaser. In The Greatest Movie Ever Sold Spurlock takes a crit­ical look at product place­ment, cor­porate branding and advert­ising in TV and film. Instead of making a boring aca­demic film, Spurlock sets out to make block­buster doc­u­mentary that is fully funded by product place­ment, spon­sor­ship and advertising.

How do products like POM Wonderful, Ban and Old Navy worm their way into a film? What does it cost Sheetz to be fea­tured in this film? Spurlock takes us behind the scenes to pitch meet­ings and mar­keting present­a­tions with various cor­porate brands to better under­stand how much of our enter­tain­ment is influ­enced by cor­por­a­tions. He covers a lot of ground by speaking to Hollywood dir­ectors (Quentin Tarantino, Peter Berg, J.J. Abrams) edu­cators (Sut Jhally, Noam Chomsky), musi­cians, advert­ising exec­ut­ives and more.

At one point, Spurlock ques­tions whether we need product place­ment and advert­ising. He flies to São Paulo, Brazil in search of some answers where the entire city has banned out­door advert­ising yet com­merce seems to thrive. He also visits Florida where the public schools would love to be able to advertise on school buses and school prop­erty to offset growing budget cut­backs. Is advert­ising really a neces­sary evil?

Spurlock’s journey of making a “doc-buster” that is fully funded by product place­ment is very enter­taining. I don’t know that the film really edu­cates the viewer but it makes you realize how receptive we’ve become to brands in pop­ular cul­ture. Almost every­where you look, you see advert­ising. At one point in the film Ralph Nader says that the only place you can avoid advert­ising is when you sleep.

Before I saw this film I had no idea that POM Wonderful is pomegranate juice. I’m sure it will be the best mil­lion dol­lars that POM Wonderful has ever spent on advert­ising their product.

It’s hard to ima­gine this film without its man from West Virginia – Morgan Spurlock. He has become his own brand in the same way that Michael Moore is now a brand. Spurlock shines in The Greatest Movie Ever Sold and without his sar­castic wit this film would be as exciting as prune juice.

****

Films are rated from 1 to 4 stars.


[Invalid Link] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9vu3dUMQ1s

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

12th & Delaware

12th & Delaware (Directors: Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady): In Fort Pierce, Florida, a battle for abor­tion rights is taking place at the inter­sec­tion of 12th Street and Delaware Avenue. On one side of the street is the pro-life Pregnancy Care Center and across the street is an abor­tion clinic called A Woman’s World.

Every day at the crack of dawn, a pro-life sup­porter keeps a watchful eye on the abor­tion clinic. Later in the day, more recruits show up and patrol the side­walk out­side of the clinic. They dis­play signs and graphic images of unborn babies to the passing traffic. When women visit the clinic, the pro-life sup­porters call out to them and urge them not to go in.

All across America there are sim­ilar abor­tion battles taking place. Pro-life centres often appear next door or across the street from abor­tion clinics. The hope is that women will enter a pro-life clinic by mis­take where they will be per­suaded to con­tinue with their preg­nancy. In some cases they are offered fin­an­cial sup­port but sadly, these prom­ises are almost never kept.

Directors Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady do a mas­terful job of providing an enga­ging and fairly objective view of the two sides in 12th & Delaware. Both groups are given equal screen time but it is the pro-life group that has all of the “inter­esting” char­ac­ters. The Hot Docs audi­ence often groaned or gasped in dis­be­lief at some of the things the film’s pro-life sup­porters were telling women in their clinic – that abor­tions can cause breast cancer or that con­doms work only 80 per cent of the time.

I think it is fair to say that the pro-life sup­porters in the film aren’t rep­res­ent­ative of all people that share the pro-life stance. The film’s pro-life sup­porters tend to say or do almost any­thing to pre­vent an abor­tion. This sets up sev­eral scenes that are dif­fi­cult to watch because they are so embar­rassing! Oddly enough, this is one of the aspects of the film that I also found appealing. It reminded me a lot of Ewing and Grady’s pre­vious film, Jesus Camp.

For me, the best moment in the film occurs when a woman pulls into the abor­tion clinic parking lot and con­fronts a pro-life sup­porter. She wants to know why the group must dis­play graphic images of an unborn fetus to passing traffic, including her child’s school bus. This woman is obvi­ously a Christian and tells the pro-life sup­porters that they are mis­guided and that there are better ways to get their mes­sage across.

Ewing and Grady had unpre­ced­ented cooper­a­tion and access to both groups, taking the viewer into each of their build­ings for a detailed look at how they operate. The preg­nancy centre uses sev­eral tac­tics in per­suading women to con­tinue with their preg­nan­cies – graphic videos, lit­er­ature, ultra­sounds and coun­seling. Across the street the abor­tion clinic oper­ates in an envir­on­ment of fear and heightened security. Cameras mon­itor the premises. Doctors are whisked into the clinic with sheets over their heads to pro­tect their iden­tities (during the filming of 12th & Delaware, abor­tion pro­vider Dr. George Tiller was murdered in his church).

I was sur­prised to learn that there are over 4,000 pro-life preg­nancy centres in the US and just over 850 abor­tion clinics. This well-crafted film doesn’t try to resolve any of the issues in the abor­tion battle but it provides a revealing look at both sides that is simply fascinating.

Official site of the film

9/10(9/10)

Second Look: Drew Kerr

12th & Delaware is the latest fea­ture doc­u­mentary from Oscar-nominated co-directors Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, the film­makers behind the excel­lent Jesus Camp, which took a dis­turbing look at the reli­gious indoc­trin­a­tion prac­tices at a Pentecostal summer camp for chil­dren. Their latest finds them focusing on the abortion/pro-life issue, as told through the events that occur at an abor­tion clinic called A Woman’s World Medical Center, and the church-affiliated Pregnancy Care Center, which just hap­pens to be on the opposite side of the street, at the inter­sec­tion of 12th Street and Delaware Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida. The set­ting is prac­tic­ally ready-made for a re-examining of the ongoing, incen­diary American debate, and Ewing and Grady take a decidedly neutral approach in showing both sides of this divisive issue. Slightly more screen time seems to have been given to the Pregnancy Care Center side, but not in a way that slants things in the pro-life direction.

The centre is run by a woman named Anne, who appears genu­inely invested emo­tion­ally in her work and the cause she believes in. Losing patients that decide to opt for an abor­tion brings her close to tears and “wins” (patients choosing to not ter­minate their preg­nancy) elicit equally emo­tional responses of joy. Some of the Pregnancy Care Center’s methods appear to border on the uneth­ical, or just plainly are. Misinformation is given about the actual abor­tion pro­cess, patients are falsely told that abor­tions can cause breast cancer, and some patients are informed (as alleged by Candace, the oper­ator of the abor­tion clinic) that they’re not as far along in their preg­nan­cies as they actu­ally are, increasing the chances that by the time they make a decision they’ll be too far along to leg­ally obtain an abor­tion. Then there’s those manip­u­lative “Hi Daddy” and “Hi Mommy” “mes­sages” from the fetus that get added by tech­ni­cians to the ultra­sound prin­touts for the parent or parents.

Life over at A Woman’s World Medical Center appears sig­ni­fic­antly more stressful for Candace and her hus­band. Threats of viol­ence and van­dalism are an everyday worry, and while the clinic hasn’t mon­et­arily brought the couple any­thing more than a modest life­style, Candace is also strongly ded­ic­ated to her work, believing women need a place like hers that gives them an option. Picketers are a con­stant pres­ence out­side the clinic, many of whom fit your “reli­gious nut” cat­egory. They walk around with signs showing grue­some pic­tures of aborted fetuses, har­angue young women (and teen­agers) as they exit and leave the clinic, amus­ingly preach their beliefs while standing out­side closed win­dows of the clinic and speaking loudly, and one par­tic­u­larly scary pro-lifer even stalks/stakes out one of the ren­dez­vous drop-off points where the doc­tors who per­form the abor­tions get picked up by Candace’s hus­band in a bright yellow Mustang (the doc­tors follow such a pro­tocol and are brought to the clinic which sheets cov­ering them to pro­tect their iden­tities). The Mustang is effect­ively used sev­eral times by Ewing and Grady, with its ominous starting roar and its slow backing out of the clinic’s garage acting as a potent little dra­matic enhance­ment in the movie.

Whenever I see a film or tele­vi­sion show that man­ages to get people to open up on such intensely per­sonal issues I marvel at how brave/stupid/attention-starved they are. I would cat­egorize the women who vis­ited the clinic or centre that talked to the Ewing and Grady as more brave than the other two adject­ives, but my mind still boggles that the dir­ectors got as much insight into these women’s minds as they did. Combine this with a well-rounded look at the two med­ical facil­ities and their prin­cipals, and the result is a com­pel­ling, thoughtful film about a very tough sub­ject that refrains from taking sides or edit­or­i­al­izing, just let­ting the facts and hap­pen­ings speak for themselves.

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Joan Rivers: A Piece Of Work

Joan Rivers: A Piece Of Work (Directors: Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg): Joan Rivers is the type of sub­ject you’d expect Nick Broomfield (Biggie and Tupac, Heidi Fleiss: Hollywood Madam) to take on instead of Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg (The Devil Came on Horseback, The Trials of Darryl Hunt). How do you go from making films about gen­o­cide and death row to the queen of comedy?

Stern first met Rivers through her family. After spending some time with Rivers and get­ting to know her better, Stern and Sundberg decided that Joan Rivers would be their next pro­ject. The idea of doing a film about a comedi­enne appealed to them and would be a nice change from their pre­vious work.

Try to Google “joan rivers” and Google will sug­gest “joan rivers plastic sur­gery.” Joan’s face is a piece of work, a lot of work. The film opens with sev­eral close-up shots of her face without any makeup and it isn’t pretty. It sets the tone for the film which gives us a raw, honest look at an aging performer.

Rivers claims that the first thing she does in the morning is her makeup, and jokes that even she can’t bear to look at her­self until she is made up. At one point in the film she arrives at a meeting with her face swollen after receiving col­lagen injec­tions. Rivers is con­sumed with her image and hates the thought of growing old and fading into obscurity.

I was struck by how much energy this 76-year-old comedi­enne has. She keeps an incred­ibly busy schedule and wor­ries con­stantly about her book­ings and appoint­ments. She jokes with her per­sonal assistant about whether she should put some sunglasses on before she looks at her day timer, wor­ried that pages will be blind­ingly white, blank. Rivers will do com­mer­cials, book sign­ings, standup comedy and pro­mote just about any­thing so long as it pays and keeps her in the spot­light. She’s a self-confessed work­aholic and the last thing she wants to do is sit by the pool and relax.

Stern and Sundberg spent 14 months with Joan Rivers, plenty of time to get to know the real Joan which I think comes across in the film. If you’re unfa­miliar with her standup comedy you might be sur­prised by some of the explet­ives coming out of her mouth. She is incred­ibly funny, quick and witty when it comes to her audi­ences. I was impressed with how she handled a heckler at a show in Wisconsin.

At the same time she comes across as a very caring and fair person. She delivers tur­keys to fam­ilies on Thanksgiving, sup­ports many family mem­bers and friends fin­an­cially, and always makes time for her adoring fans. It’s easy to look at Joan Rivers as a freak but this film takes us behind the mask and provides us with a unique look at her human side.

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

Second Look: Drew Kerr

Co-directors Ricki Stern and Annie Sundberg pre­vi­ously explored sombre sub­jects such as Rwandan gen­o­cide and the story of a death row inmate in some of their pre­vious films. Their latest doc­u­mentary tackles a decidedly less heavy sub­ject in the trail­blazing comedi­enne, but don’t be fooled by the notion a movie about some­body that makes people laugh for a living will be devoid of its own share of (rel­at­ively) darker areas. Comedians have his­tor­ic­ally been a fairly screwed up bunch and Rivers is no excep­tion, as the film cap­tures by chron­ic­ling her roller coaster career that has met with numerous per­sonal struggles along the way.

The film was shot over 14 months, during which we see Rivers cel­eb­rate her 75th birthday (she is now 77) and wear the many hats which make up her almost 50 years in show busi­ness: stand-up comedian, QVC (and any other product that’ll use her) shill, author, TV per­son­ality, phil­an­thropist, and act­ress. The film­makers had the good for­tune to be shooting during a short, but eventful period that is fit­fully emblem­atic of her entire career. Early scenes show a rest­less Rivers fret­ting over the empty pages in her day planner that sym­bolize another pro­fes­sional valley, and by the end of the movie we’ve seen her hit a career peak with a high pro­file win on NBC’s The Celebrity Apprentice, which turns out to be even more sat­is­fying because of Rivers’ claim that she was black­balled from the net­work after leaving her job as the per­manent guest host on The Tonight Show to host her own late night show on Fox in 1986 (when she called Johnny Carson to inform him of her decision he was so mad he slammed down the phone and never talked to Rivers for the rest of his life). Along the way, the viewer also sees Rivers’ per­son­ally crushing defeat from the failed 2008 London run of her auto­bi­o­graph­ical play, which she had aspir­a­tions would even­tu­ally make it to Broadway.

The 1987 sui­cide of her hus­band, Edgar, is obvi­ously brought up, although nothing ter­ribly enlight­ening about it is revealed, having already been heavily dis­cussed by Rivers over the years. The seem­ingly over­pro­tective nature of the rela­tion­ship with her daughter, Melissa, is addressed, but one only need to have seen a single episode of The Celebrity Apprentice (on which Melissa was also a con­testant) to have gotten a good sense of it. And then there’s the plastic sur­gery aspect of Joan Rivers…clearly, no writing piece on her would be com­plete without it. Rivers’ propensity for going under the knife has become her trade­mark and she has gotten plenty of mileage out of it in her career. A cur­rent print ad cam­paign for Snickers fea­tures Rivers face with the tagline “When I’m hungry, I get my face lowered”. Frankly, I’m not even sure what the hell that means, but she’s obvi­ously poking fun at her­self. The opening shot of the movie fea­tures an extreme close-up of Rivers’ sig­ni­fic­antly reworked face, sans makeup, and it’s not a pretty sight, folks. It was cer­tainly a ballsy move to have sub­jected her­self to such visual scru­tiny, espe­cially in the age of HD. I’d love to know how much trouble the film­makers had in con­vin­cing her to do it, or if she actu­ally sug­gested it (I tried asking the dir­ectors at the post-screening Q & A, but didn’t get picked by the mod­er­ator to ask my question).

Joan Rivers turns out to be rich fodder for an in-depth bio like A Piece Of Work, based on her legendary career, still sharp wit, work­aholic nature, frank opin­ions, and fas­cin­at­ingly com­plic­ated personality.

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }