Posts tagged as:

globalization

Last Train Home
Editor’s Note: Doc Soup is a monthly doc­u­mentary screening pro­gramme run by the good folks at Hot Docs. It gives audi­ences in Toronto, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver their reg­ular doc fix each year from the fall through to the spring, leading up to the Hot Docs fest­ival itself.

Last Train Home (Director: Lixin Fan): China is argu­ably the world’s most important eco­nomy at the moment and the past fifty years have seen incred­ible changes, polit­ic­ally, eco­nom­ic­ally and socially. Many film­makers have emerged from the country, including a number of excel­lent doc­u­ment­arians. Chinese-Canadian Lixin Fan can proudly stand among them with Last Train Home, just his first fea­ture film as director.

In my lim­ited exper­i­ence, to make a great film about China, you must encom­pass the country’s vast­ness, both in terms of geo­graphy and of pop­u­la­tion, but also be able to focus in on indi­vidual stories. In this case, we are intro­duced to the Zhangs, a family of migrant workers, just as the par­ents are about to make their yearly journey home to their vil­lage to cel­eb­rate Chinese New Year. Along with 140 mil­lion other migrant workers, this is often the only occa­sion they get to spend time with their chil­dren and par­ents. Making their way from the indus­trial city in which they work to their vil­lage in the coun­tryside is an exhausting and stressful multi-day journey of more than 2,000 kilo­metres. Traveling by train, bus and ferry boat, they arrive exhausted and are able to spend only a few days with their son Yang (10) and daughter Qin (17), who have grown up under the care of their grandparents.

Despite the eco­nomic real­ities which make it neces­sary for fam­ilies to be divided this way, the Zhangs feel they are doing it so that their chil­dren will have better lives. They con­stantly badger their chil­dren about their grades, per­haps because they really have nothing else to talk about. Daughter Qin is reaching the stage of adoles­cence where she begins to rebel against her par­ents. She com­plains that they’ve essen­tially aban­doned her and her brother and a few months after they’ve returned to the city, she drops out of school to become a migrant worker her­self. The boredom of rural life for a teen­ager looks very dif­ferent from the per­spective of her par­ents who have been away for 16 years working in hor­rific con­di­tions just to provide their kids with this pro­tected upbringing, but that’s lost on Qin, who wants the “freedom” of working in a factory.

While this is a crushing blow for her par­ents, who wanted to see her finish her studies, by the next year, they’re ready to travel home again for the New Year hol­iday. They’ve been pres­suring Qin to return to school, and it looks as though she’s reluct­antly agreed. But this year’s migra­tion is affected by a snowstorm which knocks out the elec­trical grid and delays the trains for days. The scenes of huge crowds pushing each other are har­rowing. While the trip home is a huge hassle at the best of times, it become a ter­ri­fying ordeal when sched­ules don’t run smoothly. When they finally board their train, it’s clear that Qin is not speaking with her par­ents, and she spends the whole trip in sullen silence.

Things come to a head during the hol­iday, and Qin’s insolence leads to a phys­ical con­front­a­tion with her father. Eventually, like all par­ents, they resign them­selves to let­ting Qin go her own way, hoping that son Yang can finish school and sup­port the family. In the mean­time, they return to the city again, back to their mono­tonous factory jobs.

My syn­opsis makes this sound like a fic­tion fea­ture, and for all the intimacy the film­makers achieve, it might as well be. It’s helped tre­mend­ously by some very crisp editing, as well as some sweeping cine­ma­to­graphy of the lush Chinese coun­tryside. Last Train Home suc­ceeds in cap­turing both the epic scale of the changes sweeping today’s China and their impact on the indi­vidual fam­ilies strug­gling with them.

Two addi­tional notes. First the dis­claimer: my com­pany (Kinosmith) is the Canadian dis­trib­utor for this film. And second, the film is headed to the Sundance Film Festival, where it will com­pete in the World Cinema Documentary Competition.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Lixin Fan from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 15:48

Official site of the film

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Let's Make Money

Let’s Make Money (Director: Erwin Wagenhofer): In 2005, I saw Wagenhofer’s We Feed the World (review), which was about the impact of glob­al­iz­a­tion on food pro­duc­tion. Here the dir­ector turns his typ­ic­ally dis­pas­sionate eye to the world of fin­ance. As in his pre­vious film, he takes us on a global tour, shooting in vivid widescreen 35mm. Along the way, he lets his inter­view sub­jects define the tenets of neo-liberal eco­nomics: dereg­u­la­tion of fin­an­cial mar­kets, lib­er­al­iz­a­tion of trade, reduc­tion in the power of the state, and privat­iz­a­tion of state-owned resources. He’s not an active pres­ence in the film, and although he lets sub­jects from all sides of the issues speak, it’s in his editing and struc­turing of the film where his per­spective comes through. For instance, after hearing from the German owner of a fab­ric­ating plant in India, we cut to a scene of a bill­board advert­ising products for a European com­pany. Under the bill­board are the shacks of people too poor to ever afford these products. Wagenhofer lays out a very clear scen­ario where money is extracted from coun­tries in the so-called “emer­ging mar­kets” to enrich the already-wealthy “investors” from the West.

In Burkina Faso, the biggest export is cotton, a crop which leaves the soil unsuit­able for growing any­thing else, including food. As a local pro­duc­tion man­ager explains, Burkina Faso could sup­port itself on its cotton exports alone if the US gov­ern­ment didn’t sub­sidize its own cotton farmers. He com­plains that the West preaches free mar­kets but then prac­tices pro­tec­tionism at home. The only other work in Burkina Faso is breaking rocks at a quarry, making the country look like a cross between a slave plant­a­tion and a prison chain gang.

Another start­ling seg­ment is set in the southern region of Spain, the so-called Costa del Sol. Despite the desert cli­mate, thou­sands of new apart­ments are being built around new golf courses. Since there is very little rain, these golf courses need to be con­stantly irrig­ated with massive amounts of water, even though hardly anyone in Spain plays golf. Worst of all, since these apart­ments are being sold as invest­ment prop­er­ties, many are being pur­chased by large pen­sion funds. Local people simply can’t afford them. The end result is that nobody is living in them. In some sweeping heli­copter shots, we see empty apart­ments cov­ering huge swathes of pre­vi­ously unspoiled coast­line. At the end of the film, we’re informed that there are three mil­lion of these empty apart­ments in Spain.

For the most part, the “talking head” inter­views are filmed in unusual places, making them visu­ally inter­esting. Development eco­nomist John Christensen is filmed on a beach in Jersey, where he was born, explaining how Jersey and other small places like it have become home to off­shore trusts, a method for cor­por­a­tions to avoid tax and hide the origin of their profits. Former “eco­nomic hit man” John Perkins appears to be walking through a jungle as he explains his own pred­atory past.

All in all, Wagenhofer has cre­ated another com­pel­ling exam­in­a­tion of forces that can often seem imper­sonal and impen­et­rable. The level of craft in his work is remark­able and he’s not afraid to put his camera in unex­pected pos­i­tions to make his points visu­ally as well as with words. If I have one cri­ti­cism, it’s that the film, at 107 minutes, is per­haps 20 minutes too long. This sort of expos­i­tion, no matter how beau­ti­fully and clearly presented, does tend to require a bit of time to pro­cess, and I think keeping this under 90 minutes would have given it more impact. At its cur­rent length, it would be easier to digest on a smaller screen. Making one of the sequences an extra on the DVD ver­sion seems like a good idea to me.

Official site of the film (in German)

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Food Inc.

by James McNally on September 7, 2008 · 2 comments

in Film Festivals,TIFF

Food Inc.

Food Inc. (2008, Director: Robert Kenner): In this com­pre­hensive and yet com­pel­ling film, dir­ector Robert Kenner, along with authors Eric Schlosser (Fast Nood Nation) and Michael Pollan (The Omnivore’s Dilemma) indict the American (and by exten­sion, global) food industry. Just the fact that we call the pro­du­cers of our daily bread an industry at all shows what sort of major changes have taken place in the worlds of farming and raising live­stock in the past cen­tury. The explo­sion of fast food in the 1950s brought factory methods to the pro­duc­tion of food and the ensuing con­sol­id­a­tion among cor­por­a­tions has res­ulted in an increas­ingly mono­pol­istic mar­ket­place. To save costs, the size of farms and feed­lots and slaughter­houses has escal­ated and safety stand­ards and working con­di­tions have plummeted.

This wide-ranging film touches on almost every con­ceiv­able issue that has affected our food supply, from new bac­terial organ­isms that threaten our health, to deteri­or­ating gov­er­ment reg­u­latory bodies, the wide­spread use of illegal immig­rant workers, and the explo­sion in dia­betes rates among the young. And yet we’re still sold an image of American’s agrarian past, and we believe it. None of the big food pro­du­cers were willing to talk to Kenner, and so he spoke to others: to the woman whose 2-year-old died from an E. Coli infec­tion, the chicken farmer who refused the demands of one of the big cor­por­a­tions and lost her con­tract, the man trying to fight for slaughter­house workers’ rights, and the artic­u­late organic farmer who’s simply trying to fight the good fight for honest and healthy food. And more than just talking heads, there are some eye-popping images from slaughter­houses and some incred­ible over­head shots of the vast feed­lots where the majority of our food comes from.

Food Inc.

Most dis­turbing, or at least prob­lem­atic, is the recent phe­nomenon of small organic food com­panies being bought up by the large cor­por­a­tions. Is this a legit­imate attempt to “green” their busi­nesses, or is it just “gre­en­washing”? Is the fact that Stonybrook Farm, the largest organic food com­pany, is now selling its products at Wal-Mart a good or a bad thing? The film touches on the sub­ject but leaves the con­clu­sions to us. That’s a bit symp­to­matic of a film which brings up so many ser­ious issues, but doesn’t have time to tackle them all. I’d recom­mend the two books above as a starting place, and the film’s accom­pa­nying web site also prom­ises to be a useful resource, not just for edu­cating ourselves, but for taking some action.

It’s a little dif­fi­cult for me to be objective about this sub­ject, because I’ve read the books and have seen a number of doc­u­ment­aries over the past few years on this sub­ject, but I am hopeful that this film has the poten­tial for mass appeal where others have not. After our screening, there was a long ova­tion and some insightful ques­tions. It remains to be seen whether this film will catch the ima­gin­a­tion of the main­stream (non-film-festivalgoer) pop­u­la­tion. I des­per­ately hope so.

Official site where you can find next steps

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Robert Kenner and author Eric Schlosser from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 12:59

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Big Sellout (Der Grosse Ausverkauf)

The Big Sellout (Der Grosse Ausverkauf) (Director: Florian Opitz, Germany, 2006): Beautifully shot on film, The Big Sellout is yet another strong polit­ical doc­u­mentary, this one on the theme of privat­iz­a­tion. Since privat­iz­a­tion is a key­stone of neo­lib­eral eco­nomic policy all over the world, the film takes us to sev­eral dif­ferent loc­ales to see its effects on real people. What we dis­cover is that the effort by mul­tina­tional cor­por­a­tions to turn the neces­sities of life (health­care, elec­tri­city, even water) into com­mod­ities is having a dev­ast­ating effect on the people of the devel­oping world.

In the Philippines, Minda spends all of her time trying to scrape money together for dia­lysis treat­ments for her teen­aged son. In South Africa, Bongani is part of a group of skilled act­iv­ists who restore elec­trical ser­vice to those whose power has been cut off for non-payment. In Bolivia, Rosa is a grand­mother who stood up to the face­less cor­por­a­tion that was attempting to privatize her city’s water supply. And in England, Simon the train driver details the breakup of British Rail and the decline of rail ser­vice in that country.

In every case, privat­iz­a­tion was the cul­prit, but to be fair, Opitz attempts to engage with the eco­nom­ists at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund who often impose privat­iz­a­tion as a pre­con­di­tion for lending to devel­oping nations. Surprisingly for the dir­ector, he gets very little cooper­a­tion from these shadowy bodies, who are ostens­ibly required to be trans­parent and account­able to their member nations. The one eco­nomist he does inter­view is Joseph Stiglitz, former Chief Economist of the World Bank who now dis­agrees with the rush to privatize everything, and who has become an opponent of most of the eco­nomic policies of globalization.

I was reminded when watching this film of sev­eral other strong anti-globalization doc­u­ment­aries of recent years, including The Take, The Corporation, and even The Yes Men. The Big Sellout adds some heartrending per­sonal stories from sev­eral corners of the world, and it’s clear that privat­iz­a­tion is really only helping those with too much money make even more of it. Without having to pay lip ser­vice to the demo­cratic ideals of national gov­ern­ments, cor­por­a­tions are con­cerned with just one thing: the pur­suit of profits. The profits may come, but the human costs should be tal­lied against them.

The only weak­ness in the film may be that I was left won­dering what I could pos­sibly do, in my com­fort­able First World life, to combat this creeping sick­ness. The film’s German web site has some edu­ca­tional mater­ials, so I hope these get trans­lated for the English site soon.

Here is the Q&A with pro­ducer Florian Opitz from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 12:37

Official site for the film

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The World According To Sesame Street

The World According To Sesame Street (USA, 2005, Director: Linda Goldstein Knowlton and Linda Hawkins, 105 minutes): Sesame Street has proven to be a very suc­cessful American export, now being seen in more than 120 coun­tries. This film looks at the very unique pro­cess of estab­lishing co-productions with local edu­cators, pro­du­cers and pup­pet­eers, focusing on two chal­len­ging loc­a­tions: Kosovo and Bangladesh.

By far the most time is spent on the Bangladeshi pro­duc­tion, and the real star of the film is Sesame Workshop pro­ducer Nadia Zylstra, who began her job three weeks before filming began. We follow this very excit­able South African woman as she begins the pro­cess of defining what the pro­gram will look like in Bangladesh. The film shows us the nuts and bolts of how the pro­duc­tion comes together, and some of the chal­lenges involved when dealing with local oppos­i­tion and delays.

I enjoyed the film and found it very inspiring, but I think it missed a chance to dig a bit deeper into the issue of what some audi­ence mem­bers called “cul­tural imper­i­alism.” Though they’re very careful to “partner” with local people, the Sesame Street organ­iz­a­tion is still American and fuelled by American values and defin­i­tions of suc­cess. Some of the ques­tions sur­rounding the “export” of an American model would have been very inter­esting to explore.

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }