Tag Archive for 'mumblecore'

Present Company

Present Company

Editor’s Note: I’ve decided to begin posting my reviews of films screening at SXSW early, hopefully helping anyone attending make some decisions about what to see. Present Company is screening on Monday March 10 at 5:00pm and Wednesday March 12 at 9:00pm. All screenings are at the Dobie.

Present Company (2008, Director: Frank V. Ross): I’ve only recently become aware of the work of Frank V. Ross. His previous features Hohokam (2007) and Quietly On By (2005) have generated some buzz and placed him peripherally among the group of filmmakers now desperately trying to shed the “mumblecore” label. The main difference between Ross and those other filmmakers isthat his protagonists are often less educated and live in the rural suburbs rather than in urban settings. Unlike his previous films, in Present Company, he plays the protagonist himself. Buddy is a young father living with his girlfriend Christy (Tamara Fana) and their baby Mikey in the basement of Christy’s parents’ house. It’s clear that they’re only together because of Mikey, and that they’re both interested in moving on. Though their actual ages are not mentioned, both of them act like spoiled teenagers for most of the film, and it was quite easy to grow tired of Buddy’s bullying of Christy and even his friends. He pursues a new relationship without telling Christy, and when the new girl finds out about his domestic situation, she isn’t happy, either.

Though I couldn’t really relate much to these characters, I found the depiction realistic to the point of near-documentary, and I think that will make the film stick with me. There is a final scene where Buddy makes a rather obvious grasp toward maturity, but I can’t decide if I feel it meant anything. In the end, there’s very little going on between the characters, and I found it a bit wearing to be in the presence of such self-absorbed dysfunctional people for so long. That being said, Frank V. Ross has made a film of real authenticity. I just wish there were a little more hope.

Karina Longworth places the earlier films of Frank V. Ross into context with the other “m-word” films (and much more eloquently than I ever could).

6/10(6/10)

Quiet City/Dance Party USA

Quiet City/Dance Party USA

In her generally negative appraisal of the “mumblecore” movement in the November/December 2007 issue of Film Comment, Amy Taubin reserves praise for the two features written and directed by Aaron Katz, calling him a “breakout talent” and praising both the “lyric beauty” of his cinematography (although acknowledging he used different DPs for each film) and his “expressive” sound design. I’d seen the posters for both films, and some stills and the trailer for Quiet City, and was intrigued. Though I’m still a mumblecore novice, I’ve made some assumptions of my own, and before even seeing Katz’s films, thought he had a much more developed visual sense than some of the others. With preconceptions in mind, I sat down to watch both films this weekend, thanks to the gorgeous DVD package from Benten Films, available January 29, 2008. In addition to both films, the DVD package features director and cast commentaries on both films, alternative and extended scenes, an early short film, footage from Quiet City’s New York premiere, and more. Benten are quickly becoming the Criterion of the indie film world.

Quiet City (2007, Director: Aaron Katz): In its brief 78 minutes, Quiet City was able to accomplish something quite remarkable. By the end of the film, I was beginning to care about a couple of people whom I almost dismissed at the start. Though the script still feels a bit undercooked in places, and the sound mix often had me straining to hear what was being said, the editing and acting actually felt natural so that I journeyed with the characters from awkwardness to curiosity to empathy to genuine connection.

The story arc is modest, to say the least, and I wouldn’t consider my plot summary to be spoiling anything, but just in case, consider this a spoiler alert and skip to next paragraph if you like. Jamie (Erin Fisher) arrives in Brooklyn toward evening. At the subway stop, she asks stranger Charlie (Cris Lankenau) directions to a diner where she’s supposed to meet her friend Samantha. When Samantha fails to show, Charlie and her spend the rest of the evening and the next day together. For the first ten minutes, their twentysomething slacker (lack of) vocabulary was driving me nuts, with each “like” hitting my eardrums like a sharpened stick. But it’s remarkable how their dialogue improves as their nervousness dissipates, and before long, they’re teasing each other good-naturedly. There’s a definite attraction between them, but each is careful not to spoil it by making a wrong move. The film really catches fire as the two attend a gallery event the next evening. At a party afterward, they separate, Charlie chatting amiably with strangers about nothing much, and Jamie having a serious conversation with her friend Robin about Robin’s fear of intimacy. In her friend’s halting speech, complete with more adolescent “likes,” we see how far Jamie has moved in just a short time. When they leave the party together, it’s as if they were meant to be together, so different do they seem from anyone else they’ve encountered. They share a lovely chaste moment of affection on the subway and the film ends.

Katz’s achievement is to accomplish this in such a short space of time, and with no grand speeches or declarations of love. The plot sounds very similar to Richard Linklater’s Before Sunrise, a film I’ve not actually seen, but knowing Linklater, that film is bound to be more lofty and chatty and intellectual than this one. And perhaps less real for that reason. As a married man in my 40s, I can cringe at some of the things these characters say, but it’s only because they’re acting within their limitations. Their awkwardness and lack of direction are genuine, as is their desperate desire to hide them beneath a layer of cool.

The cinematography was generally excellent, bathing Brooklyn in a warm and golden light. There were a few occasions where a tripod would have been welcome, though, and a few of the camera set ups seemed a little slapdash, but the feeling of the images was perfect. As was the music, which was used sparingly and to good emotional effect.

I’m quite sure that Quiet City will reward repeat viewings, and I’m looking forward to listening to the cast and director commentaries to see how Katz managed to turn my feelings around so quickly. It seems a little like magic.

Quiet City poster

7/10(7/10)


Dance Party USA (2006, Director: Aaron Katz): Although released in 2006, this film was actually shot in 2004, and so seeing it after Quiet City, I expected to notice to be a huge leap forward in Katz’s development as a director. Instead, I found myself enjoying the earlier film even more. Similar in structure and even in theme, there is a pretty big difference in tone and in at least one of the characters. I found Dance Party USA more direct and the script was much tighter.

Set among a group of high school students in Portland, the film shares the basic arc of Quiet City. Over the course of a day or two, a male protagonist reaches out to a somewhat mysterious woman and the film ends with them reaching a sweet and rather tentative connection. In the case of Dance Party USA, our protagonist is the teenaged Lothario Gus, first seen bragging about the sexual conquest of an underage girl to his vacuous friend Bill. Played by Cole Pennsinger, Gus is a guy on the brink of leaving his adolescent persona behind him. His Beavis and Butthead exchanges with Bill are leaving him unfulfilled, and he’s looking for a more real connection than the “hook-ups” he seems able to achieve with ease. One night at a Fourth of July house party, he meets Jessica, sitting alone outside. She’s a friend of his ex, and she’s aware of his reputation. But he sits down and, almost like he’s in a confession booth, he begins to tell her about something he’s done in the recent past, something that was very wrong. Somehow, he feels he can trust her, and after sitting silently through his confession, she lights two sparklers and hands him one. “Do you want to go somewhere?” she asks. Each sees something in the other that no one else has yet seen, and each wants to be that something more than anything else. Gus is actually finding that being a horny teenager is getting in the way of him finding a real connection. Jessica is more of an enigma, but played by the lovely Anna Kavan, she oozes mystery, if not depth.

Later in the film, Gus attempts to make things right for his earlier misdeed, but finds he’s awkward and unsure what to do. And his later exchanges with Bill are frankly hilarious, as he talks about wanting to pursue something creative (photography, painting) and then asks Bill for a hug. There is a lot of dialogue in this film, compared to Quiet City. The exciting thing is to see the drunken sincerity of teens at a beerbash developing into the first halting attempts at full-time adult sincerity. Pennsinger and Kavan both show their vulnerability in different ways. Gus has to escape a persona, albeit one that has served him well for some time, while Jessica has just seemed unimpressed with the quality of the men she’s been around, and is opening herself up for perhaps the first time. Maybe it’s because I’m more of a dialogue person than most, but I found these performances stronger than the ones with fewer words in Quiet City.

All in all, a great pair of films and a great introduction to an exciting young director.

Dance Party USA poster

8/10(8/10)

Buy Quiet City/Dance Party USA from Amazon.ca

Buy Quiet City/Dance Party USA from Amazon.com

LOL

LOL

LOL (Director: Joe Swanberg, 2006): With the backlash against the so-called “mumblecore” movement already starting, I thought I’d better review this film now. I’ll admit that this is only the second film I’ve seen that falls within the bounds of the loose grouping of actors and directors that go by that moniker. The first was The Puffy Chair (review), by the Duplass brothers, which was pretty good. Not great, but good. LOL evoked the same reaction from me. Director Joe Swanberg writes and stars with his friends Kevin Bewersdorf (who also composed the music) and C. Mason Wells as three college-age guys who are so caught up in their communication “technology” that they don’t do much actual communicating, especially with the women in their lives. As a confirmed gadget lover (but, strangely, cell-phone hater), I found a lot of humour in the film, and I could relate just a bit to some of the characters’ bad behaviour. Alex (Bewersdorf) becomes so obsessed with a woman he’s seen naked online that he totally misses a chance for a relationship with a real woman (the wonderfully dorky Tipper Watson). Chris’ separation from his girlfriend for the summer leads him to try to connect with her through technology, but only on his terms. And Tim (Swanberg) can’t seem to tear himself away from his laptop or his cellphone long enough to have an actual conversation, especially with his sorely neglected girlfriend Ada (Brigid Reagan). This cast reminded me a bit of Whit Stillman’s ensemble in Metropolitan (1990), one of my favourite indie films. But the writing isn’t nearly as good, nor are the performances. Still, the situations are realistic enough, and the characters are flawed but likeable. When you realize just how young Swanberg and his pals really are (he’s 26), and how prodigious his output has been (he’s averaged a feature film a year since 2005’s Kissing On The Mouth, plus directed a series of webcasts for Nerve.com), you have to be at least a little bit impressed.

“Mumblecore” seems to have been as much a creation of the indie film press as any sort of self-conscious “school” of filmmaking. Swanberg just seems to be canny enough to use his friends as collaborators as often as possible. Unfortunately, that has its limitations. Now that he’s established that he can write and direct, I’d like to see him try working with some professional actors. Watching LOL seemed just a bit too much like watching his home movies. If the backlash has truly begun, that might be just the catalyst that Swanberg and his friends need to make some wider connections. I’m looking forward to seeing where the mumblecore gang go next.

Official site for the film

7/10(7/10)

P.S. For the record, I found Amy Taubin’s article in Film Comment (the “backlash” article linked above) to be incredibly mean-spirited toward Joe Swanberg. It will be interesting to see the fallout from what looks to be a personal attack.

The Puffy Chair

The Puffy Chair

The Puffy Chair (Director: Jay Duplass, USA, 2005): The Puffy Chair was the recipient of significant buzz after it won the Audience Award at the South by Southwest film festival in 2005, and the fact that a film made for $15,000 can even get released on DVD is pretty impressive, so I was curious to see what all the fuss was about.

Created by the Duplass Brothers (Jay directs, while brother Mark plays the lead), the film is a road movie that traces the deterioration of twenty-something slacker couple Josh and Emily’s relationship. Josh has purchased the titular chair on eBay as a gift for his father’s upcoming birthday, and the plan is for him to drive from New York to his parents’ home in Atlanta, picking up the chair along the way. Circumstances conspire such that not only does Emily end up coming along, but Josh’s even-more-aimless and psychobabble-spouting brother Rhett joins them as well. The comedy is of the Curb Your Enthusiasm variety, with situations spiralling out of control for no good reason except one character or another’s refusal to back down or admit their mistake. I happen to love this kind of uncomfortable humour, and a scene near the beginning where Josh tries to rent a motel room for the group while pretending to be just one person is hilarious.

Other reviewers have pointed to the film’s strength in documenting the damaged relationship between Josh and Emily, and while I can agree intellectually, I guess I’m a little too far removed from my twenties to really feel it so strongly. Both of them are pretty manipulative and immature, and it took a while for me to warm to them. As film characters, I didn’t mind spending 90 minutes with them, but I’d really hate to have real friends like this. (Sorry, hipsters).

Technically, the film was as good as it could be based on the miniscule budget. I did find the incessant small zooms distracting, as well as the frequent loss of focus. But the script wasn’t bad, and some of the situations were genuinely funny. The chemistry between the actors was good as well, and by the end, despite what I said above, I was really hoping that somehow Josh and Emily could salvage things and maybe learn something from their strange journey. The film’s abrupt ending made me realize that I cared about these screwups more than I thought.

Official site for the film

7/10(7/10)