mumblecore

Present Company
Editor’s Note: I’ve decided to begin posting my reviews of films screening at SXSW early, hope­fully helping anyone attending make some decisions about what to see. Present Company is screening on Monday March 10 at 5:00pm and Wednesday March 12 at 9:00pm. All screen­ings are at the Dobie.

Present Company (2008, Director: Frank V. Ross): I’ve only recently become aware of the work of Frank V. Ross. His pre­vious fea­tures Hohokam (2007) and Quietly On By (2005) have gen­er­ated some buzz and placed him peri­pher­ally among the group of film­makers now des­per­ately trying to shed the “mumble­core” label. The main dif­fer­ence between Ross and those other film­makers is that his prot­ag­on­ists are often less edu­cated and live in the rural sub­urbs rather than in urban set­tings. Unlike his pre­vious films, in Present Company, he plays the prot­ag­onist him­self. Buddy is a young father living with his girl­friend Christy (Tamara Fana) and their baby Mikey in the base­ment of Christy’s par­ents’ house. It’s clear that they’re only together because of Mikey, and that they’re both inter­ested in moving on. Though their actual ages are not men­tioned, both of them act like spoiled teen­agers for most of the film, and it was quite easy to grow tired of Buddy’s bul­lying of Christy and even his friends. He pur­sues a new rela­tion­ship without telling Christy, and when the new girl finds out about his domestic situ­ation, she isn’t happy, either.

Though I couldn’t really relate much to these char­ac­ters, I found the depic­tion real­istic to the point of near-documentary, and I think that will make the film stick with me. There is a final scene where Buddy makes a rather obvious grasp toward maturity, but I can’t decide if I feel it meant any­thing. In the end, there’s very little going on between the char­ac­ters, and I found it a bit wearing to be in the pres­ence of such self-absorbed dys­func­tional people for so long. That being said, Frank V. Ross has made a film of real authen­ti­city. I just wish there were a little more hope.

Karina Longworth places the earlier films of Frank V. Ross into con­text with the other “m-word” films (and much more elo­quently than I ever could).

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Quiet City/Dance Party USA

In her gen­er­ally neg­ative appraisal of the “mumble­core” move­ment in the November/December 2007 issue of Film Comment, Amy Taubin reserves praise for the two fea­tures written and dir­ected by Aaron Katz, calling him a “breakout talent” and praising both the “lyric beauty” of his cine­ma­to­graphy (although acknow­ledging he used dif­ferent DPs for each film) and his “expressive” sound design. I’d seen the posters for both films, and some stills and the trailer for Quiet City, and was intrigued. Though I’m still a mumble­core novice, I’ve made some assump­tions of my own, and before even seeing Katz’s films, thought he had a much more developed visual sense than some of the others. With pre­con­cep­tions in mind, I sat down to watch both films this weekend, thanks to the gor­geous DVD package from Benten Films, avail­able January 29, 2008. In addi­tion to both films, the DVD package fea­tures dir­ector and cast com­ment­aries on both films, altern­ative and extended scenes, an early short film, footage from Quiet City’s New York premiere, and more. Benten are quickly becoming the Criterion of the indie film world.

Quiet City (2007, Director: Aaron Katz): In its brief 78 minutes, Quiet City was able to accom­plish some­thing quite remark­able. By the end of the film, I was begin­ning to care about a couple of people whom I almost dis­missed at the start. Though the script still feels a bit under­cooked in places, and the sound mix often had me straining to hear what was being said, the editing and acting actu­ally felt nat­ural so that I jour­neyed with the char­ac­ters from awk­ward­ness to curi­osity to empathy to genuine connection.

The story arc is modest, to say the least, and I wouldn’t con­sider my plot sum­mary to be spoiling any­thing, but just in case, con­sider this a spoiler alert and skip to next para­graph if you like. Jamie (Erin Fisher) arrives in Brooklyn toward evening. At the subway stop, she asks stranger Charlie (Cris Lankenau) dir­ec­tions to a diner where she’s sup­posed to meet her friend Samantha. When Samantha fails to show, Charlie and her spend the rest of the evening and the next day together. For the first ten minutes, their twentyso­mething slacker (lack of) vocab­u­lary was driving me nuts, with each “like” hit­ting my eardrums like a sharpened stick. But it’s remark­able how their dia­logue improves as their nervous­ness dis­sip­ates, and before long, they’re teasing each other good-naturedly. There’s a def­inite attrac­tion between them, but each is careful not to spoil it by making a wrong move. The film really catches fire as the two attend a gal­lery event the next evening. At a party after­ward, they sep­arate, Charlie chat­ting ami­ably with strangers about nothing much, and Jamie having a ser­ious con­ver­sa­tion with her friend Robin about Robin’s fear of intimacy. In her friend’s halting speech, com­plete with more adoles­cent “likes,” we see how far Jamie has moved in just a short time. When they leave the party together, it’s as if they were meant to be together, so dif­ferent do they seem from anyone else they’ve encountered. They share a lovely chaste moment of affec­tion on the subway and the film ends.

Katz’s achieve­ment is to accom­plish this in such a short space of time, and with no grand speeches or declar­a­tions of love. The plot sounds very sim­ilar to Richard Linklater’s Before Sunrise, a film I’ve not actu­ally seen, but knowing Linklater, that film is bound to be more lofty and chatty and intel­lec­tual than this one. And per­haps less real for that reason. As a mar­ried man in my 40s, I can cringe at some of the things these char­ac­ters say, but it’s only because they’re acting within their lim­it­a­tions. Their awk­ward­ness and lack of dir­ec­tion are genuine, as is their des­perate desire to hide them beneath a layer of cool.

The cine­ma­to­graphy was gen­er­ally excel­lent, bathing Brooklyn in a warm and golden light. There were a few occa­sions where a tripod would have been wel­come, though, and a few of the camera set ups seemed a little slap­dash, but the feeling of the images was per­fect. As was the music, which was used spar­ingly and to good emo­tional effect.

I’m quite sure that Quiet City will reward repeat view­ings, and I’m looking for­ward to listening to the cast and dir­ector com­ment­aries to see how Katz man­aged to turn my feel­ings around so quickly. It seems a little like magic.

Quiet City poster

7/10(7/10)


Dance Party USA (2006, Director: Aaron Katz): Although released in 2006, this film was actu­ally shot in 2004, and so seeing it after Quiet City, I expected to notice to be a huge leap for­ward in Katz’s devel­op­ment as a dir­ector. Instead, I found myself enjoying the earlier film even more. Similar in struc­ture and even in theme, there is a pretty big dif­fer­ence in tone and in at least one of the char­ac­ters. I found Dance Party USA more direct and the script was much tighter.

Set among a group of high school stu­dents in Portland, the film shares the basic arc of Quiet City. Over the course of a day or two, a male prot­ag­onist reaches out to a some­what mys­ter­ious woman and the film ends with them reaching a sweet and rather tent­ative con­nec­tion. In the case of Dance Party USA, our prot­ag­onist is the teen­aged Lothario Gus, first seen brag­ging about the sexual con­quest of an underage girl to his vacuous friend Bill. Played by Cole Pennsinger, Gus is a guy on the brink of leaving his adoles­cent per­sona behind him. His Beavis and Butthead exchanges with Bill are leaving him unful­filled, and he’s looking for a more real con­nec­tion than the “hook-ups” he seems able to achieve with ease. One night at a Fourth of July house party, he meets Jessica, sit­ting alone out­side. She’s a friend of his ex, and she’s aware of his repu­ta­tion. But he sits down and, almost like he’s in a con­fes­sion booth, he begins to tell her about some­thing he’s done in the recent past, some­thing that was very wrong. Somehow, he feels he can trust her, and after sit­ting silently through his con­fes­sion, she lights two spark­lers and hands him one. “Do you want to go some­where?” she asks. Each sees some­thing in the other that no one else has yet seen, and each wants to be that some­thing more than any­thing else. Gus is actu­ally finding that being a horny teen­ager is get­ting in the way of him finding a real con­nec­tion. Jessica is more of an enigma, but played by the lovely Anna Kavan, she oozes mys­tery, if not depth.

Later in the film, Gus attempts to make things right for his earlier mis­deed, but finds he’s awk­ward and unsure what to do. And his later exchanges with Bill are frankly hil­arious, as he talks about wanting to pursue some­thing cre­ative (pho­to­graphy, painting) and then asks Bill for a hug. There is a lot of dia­logue in this film, com­pared to Quiet City. The exciting thing is to see the drunken sin­cerity of teens at a beerbash devel­oping into the first halting attempts at full-time adult sin­cerity. Pennsinger and Kavan both show their vul­ner­ab­ility in dif­ferent ways. Gus has to escape a per­sona, albeit one that has served him well for some time, while Jessica has just seemed unim­pressed with the quality of the men she’s been around, and is opening her­self up for per­haps the first time. Maybe it’s because I’m more of a dia­logue person than most, but I found these per­form­ances stronger than the ones with fewer words in Quiet City.

All in all, a great pair of films and a great intro­duc­tion to an exciting young director.

Dance Party USA poster

8/10(8/10)

Buy Quiet City/Dance Party USA from Amazon.ca

Buy Quiet City/Dance Party USA from Amazon.com

UPDATE 6/21/08 Both of these films played at the Toronto stop of the Generation DIY mini-festival which is trav­el­ling across Canada in the next few weeks. Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Aaron Katz held after the screening of Dance Party USA. The first loud voice is your humble author asking a ques­tion, the second loud voice belongs to my friend and col­league Bob Turnbull, and that’s Canada AM’s film critic Richard Crouse hosting the session:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 13:10

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

LOL

by James McNally on November 10, 2007

in DVD

LOL

LOL (Director: Joe Swanberg, 2006): With the back­lash against the so-called “mumble­core” move­ment already starting, I thought I’d better review this film now. I’ll admit that this is only the second film I’ve seen that falls within the bounds of the loose grouping of actors and dir­ectors that go by that moniker. The first was The Puffy Chair (review), by the Duplass brothers, which was pretty good. Not great, but good. LOL evoked the same reac­tion from me. Director Joe Swanberg writes and stars with his friends Kevin Bewersdorf (who also com­posed the music) and C. Mason Wells as three college-age guys who are so caught up in their com­mu­nic­a­tion “tech­no­logy” that they don’t do much actual com­mu­nic­ating, espe­cially with the women in their lives. As a con­firmed gadget lover (but, strangely, cell-phone hater), I found a lot of humour in the film, and I could relate just a bit to some of the char­ac­ters’ bad beha­viour. Alex (Bewersdorf) becomes so obsessed with a woman he’s seen naked online that he totally misses a chance for a rela­tion­ship with a real woman (the won­der­fully dorky Tipper Watson). Chris’ sep­ar­a­tion from his girl­friend for the summer leads him to try to con­nect with her through tech­no­logy, but only on his terms. And Tim (Swanberg) can’t seem to tear him­self away from his laptop or his cell­phone long enough to have an actual con­ver­sa­tion, espe­cially with his sorely neg­lected girl­friend Ada (Brigid Reagan). This cast reminded me a bit of Whit Stillman’s ensemble in Metropolitan (1990), one of my favourite indie films. But the writing isn’t nearly as good, nor are the per­form­ances. Still, the situ­ations are real­istic enough, and the char­ac­ters are flawed but like­able. When you realize just how young Swanberg and his pals really are (he’s 26), and how prodi­gious his output has been (he’s aver­aged a fea­ture film a year since 2005’s Kissing On The Mouth, plus dir­ected a series of web­casts for Nerve.com), you have to be at least a little bit impressed.

“Mumblecore” seems to have been as much a cre­ation of the indie film press as any sort of self-conscious “school” of film­making. Swanberg just seems to be canny enough to use his friends as col­lab­or­ators as often as pos­sible. Unfortunately, that has its lim­it­a­tions. Now that he’s estab­lished that he can write and direct, I’d like to see him try working with some pro­fes­sional actors. Watching LOL seemed just a bit too much like watching his home movies. If the back­lash has truly begun, that might be just the cata­lyst that Swanberg and his friends need to make some wider con­nec­tions. I’m looking for­ward to seeing where the mumble­core gang go next.

Official site for the film

7/10(7/10)

P.S. For the record, I found Amy Taubin’s art­icle in Film Comment (the “back­lash” art­icle linked above) to be incred­ibly mean-spirited toward Joe Swanberg. It will be inter­esting to see the fal­lout from what looks to be a per­sonal attack.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Puffy Chair

by James McNally on April 17, 2007 · 1 comment

in DVD

The Puffy Chair

The Puffy Chair (Director: Jay Duplass, USA, 2005): The Puffy Chair was the recip­ient of sig­ni­ficant buzz after it won the Audience Award at the South by Southwest film fest­ival in 2005, and the fact that a film made for $15,000 can even get released on DVD is pretty impressive, so I was curious to see what all the fuss was about.

Created by the Duplass Brothers (Jay dir­ects, while brother Mark plays the lead), the film is a road movie that traces the deteri­or­a­tion of twenty-something slacker couple Josh and Emily’s rela­tion­ship. Josh has pur­chased the tit­ular chair on eBay as a gift for his father’s upcoming birthday, and the plan is for him to drive from New York to his par­ents’ home in Atlanta, picking up the chair along the way. Circumstances con­spire such that not only does Emily end up coming along, but Josh’s even-more-aimless and psychobabble-spouting brother Rhett joins them as well. The comedy is of the Curb Your Enthusiasm variety, with situ­ations spiralling out of con­trol for no good reason except one char­acter or another’s refusal to back down or admit their mis­take. I happen to love this kind of uncom­fort­able humour, and a scene near the begin­ning where Josh tries to rent a motel room for the group while pre­tending to be just one person is hilarious.

Other reviewers have pointed to the film’s strength in doc­u­menting the dam­aged rela­tion­ship between Josh and Emily, and while I can agree intel­lec­tu­ally, I guess I’m a little too far removed from my twen­ties to really feel it so strongly. Both of them are pretty manip­u­lative and imma­ture, and it took a while for me to warm to them. As film char­ac­ters, I didn’t mind spending 90 minutes with them, but I’d really hate to have real friends like this. (Sorry, hipsters).

Technically, the film was as good as it could be based on the min­is­cule budget. I did find the incessant small zooms dis­tracting, as well as the fre­quent loss of focus. But the script wasn’t bad, and some of the situ­ations were genu­inely funny. The chem­istry between the actors was good as well, and by the end, des­pite what I said above, I was really hoping that somehow Josh and Emily could sal­vage things and maybe learn some­thing from their strange journey. The film’s abrupt ending made me realize that I cared about these screwups more than I thought.

Official site for the film

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }