music

Backyard

by James McNally on January 31, 2012

in Documentaries,DVD

Backyard

Backyard (Director: Árni Sveinsson): While it’s true that I’ve long been a fan of Icelandic cinema, I have been a fan of Icelandic music for even longer. In the late 1980s, a band called The Sugarcubes and their elfin singer Björk intro­duced me to the unique sounds of this tiny country, and since then, I’ve come to love dozens of bands from Iceland. Someone in another recent doc­u­mentary about Iceland’s seem­ingly bound­less cre­ativity said that the fear of failure is almost nonex­istent, so people take risks. They also help each other out, which is exactly how Backyard came to be.

Each August the city of Reykjavik cel­eb­rates Menningarnótt (Reykjavik Culture Night), a daylong cel­eb­ra­tion of the cre­ative spirit of its cit­izens. There are all kinds of offi­cial and unof­fi­cial events, and in 2009, Árni Rúnar Hlöðversson (of FM Belfast) decided to hold a con­cert in his back­yard and invite his friends to play. He wanted to record the audio, but he also invited his friend Árni Sveinsson to shoot video. None of the bands (or even the two Árnis) thought they were making a “real” movie, so the whole thing is incred­ibly loose. Based on my own exper­i­ences in Iceland, most things organ­ized are “incred­ibly loose.” Icelanders like to fly by the seat of their pants, to be honest, but it gives the film a real energy, too.

Though we get the back­ground around the plan­ning (which seems to happen in a matter of days), the majority of the film’s brisk 73-minute run­ning time is given over to the per­form­ances, and what a treat. The lineup is incred­ibly diverse, from the lo-fi styl­ings of Borko and Sin Fang Bous to the raucous assault of Reykjavik! to the feel-good party sounds of Retro Stefson and FM Belfast (whose finale “Underwear” is guar­an­teed have you boun­cing around your living room grin­ning like an idiot). And though the musical styles change, it’s great to see how many bands actu­ally share mem­bers. In a small place like Iceland, this might be a neces­sity but it also allows for some very inter­esting musical cross-pollination. It’s fit­ting that the film ends with many of the musi­cians soaking together in one of Reykjavik’s thermal swim­ming pools.

Some of these bands (múm, Hjaltalín) were known to me, but most were new dis­cov­eries, and luckily the DVD package (buy it here!) comes with an audio CD of the songs as well. It’s been on con­stant rota­tion over the past few months for me, rein­for­cing my sin­cere belief that Iceland is pound-for-pound the most cre­ative place on the planet.

Official site of the film

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

From the Sky Down

From the Sky Down (Director: Davis Guggenheim): When asked to choose the best two albums in U2’s cata­logue, most fans and music critics will pick 1987’s The Joshua Tree and 1991’s Achtung Baby. That the band’s strongest work is on albums that sound so rad­ic­ally dif­ferent from one another is, even two dec­ades later, fairly astounding, and points emphat­ic­ally to the group’s renowned dis­dain for cre­ative passivity. As frontman Bono has fam­ously said, Achtung Baby was “the sound of four men cut­ting down The Joshua Tree”, as U2 struggled to cope with super­stardom and needed to “go away and dream it all up again.” That hard-fought musical and per­sonal journey for the band forms the found­a­tion of From the Sky Down, dir­ected by Davis Guggenheim (best known for An Inconvenient Truth and Waiting for Superman). Guggenheim, who had pre­vi­ously dir­ected U2 gui­tarist The Edge in his under­seen 2008 film It Might Get Loud, was approached by the band to put together some sort of visual doc­u­ment to tie in with the upcoming 20th anniversary reissue of Achtung Baby.

From the Sky Down takes a sur­pris­ingly brief glimpse at the band’s overall his­tory and I was also some­what taken aback by the com­plete absence of any men­tion of what they might have up their sleeve for the future. No, the focus here is almost entirely on the late 80s-early 90s era of the group, a refreshing approach from a rock doc­u­mentary format that tra­di­tion­ally only offers a quickly moving bio­graph­ical sum­mary, with little allow­ance for a truly in-depth exam­in­a­tion of par­tic­ular periods or albums. Perhaps the band was inspired by The Promise: The Making of Darkness on the Edge of Town, another high pro­file doc that decon­structed the making of a classic album from their friend and peer, Bruce Springsteen. From the Sky Down fea­tures extensive one-on-one inter­views with each member of the band (they’re rounded out by drummer Larry Mullen Jr. and bassist Adam Clayton) that provide a com­pre­hensive revis­iting of a period that began just after the band’s explo­sion in pop­ularity with the release of The Joshua Tree, through to the begin­ning of their land­mark Zoo TV Tour in 1992. Not sur­pris­ingly, the inter­views with the sharp-witted Bono are the most rev­el­atory and enter­taining. Special atten­tion is paid to 1988’s Rattle and Hum, the much-derided and mis­un­der­stood doc­u­mentary (with a com­panion album) that chron­icled U2’s bur­geoning interest in American roots music. Personally, I’m a huge fan of the film, but the band admits their mes­sage was mis­in­ter­preted and only rein­forced many people’s opinion of the Irish quartet as self-important and insuf­fer­able per­son­al­ities. Guggenheim makes good use of some pre­vi­ously unseen Rattle and Hum out­takes, including one that shows an irate Bono rip­ping on some incom­petent stage workers.

Achtung Baby’s dif­fi­cult recording ses­sions form the heart of the film, with addi­tional per­spective provided by the album’s pro­du­cers (Daniel Lanois and Brian Eno), engineer (Flood), and long­time pho­to­grapher (Anton Corbijn). Guggenheim recon­venes the group at Berlin’s Hansa Studios, where recording began, but where little res­ults were pro­duced due to cre­ative fric­tion and road­b­locks. Bono and The Edge wanted to take U2’s sound in a more elec­tronic, exper­i­mental dir­ec­tion, with which Mullen Jr. and Clayton couldn’t come to terms. The occa­sional anim­a­tion sequences that Guggenheim employs (accom­panied by band member voi­ceovers taken from their inter­views) are used to best effect here, with one sequence showing meta­phor­ical walls being erected between the four band­mates. The visual takes on even more sym­bolic meaning, con­sid­ering they were in the city during the fall of the Berlin Wall. The band digs out and reflects on old demos, and talks about their song­writing pro­cess, which fre­quently fea­tures Bono using gib­berish (dubbed “Bongolese”) in place of unwritten lyrics. Two songs get the most atten­tion: “Mysterious Ways” and “One.” The former, ori­gin­ally titled “Sick Puppy,” helped the band turn a corner from their cre­ative dif­fi­culties and even­tu­ally led to the cre­ation of “One,” which sprang from an idea used in the ori­ginal bridge in “Mysterious Ways.” The two tracks were the only ones from the album that were com­pleted in Berlin, with the rest fin­ished back home in Dublin.

Guggenheim’s decision to bookend the film with scenes from the group’s much-hyped appear­ance at this past summer’s Glastonbury Festival is only mod­er­ately effective, but he cap­tures some great footage of the band rehearsing various Achtung Baby songs in pre­par­a­tion for the big gig (one of the filming loc­a­tions is Winnipeg’s Burton Cummings Theatre, during a tour stop in the city this past spring). The standouts include a rough run-through of “Who’s Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses,” which really jumped out of the speakers of the Ryerson Theatre’s sound system, and a rare solo vocal per­form­ance from The Edge of the album’s haunting closing song, “Love Is Blindness.” U2 has always been a band that has been quite pro­tective of their cre­ative pro­cess, and judging by the loose­ness and candour demon­strated by the band as we see them revisit old songs and exper­i­ment with arrange­ments (we see Bono yelling out upcoming chord changes to the rest of the group), it’s clear that Guggenheim was able to cul­tivate an intimate level of trust with his subjects.

Shot over the course of six months earlier this year and com­pleted just a week before its world premiere last month at TIFF, Guggenheim’s doc­u­mentary digs deep down into the inner work­ings of a band at a pivotal and tumul­tuous phase in their career. My only com­plaint about From the Sky Down would be that the dir­ector doesn’t quite dig deep enough when it comes to looking at the whole of Achtung Baby, an album that Bono says in the film “is the reason we’re still here now.” An inor­dinate amount of atten­tion is paid to the cre­ation of “Mysterious Ways” and “One” (which are important songs, to be sure), while other not­able tracks such as “The Fly,” “Even Better Than the Real Thing,” “Who’s Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses,” and “Until the End of the World” are included only as per­form­ances or over the soundtrack, with little or no detail or insight into their ori­gins. One of the album’s best songs, “Ultraviolet (Light My Way),” isn’t men­tioned at all, nor can I recall even hearing a snippet of it in the film. Despite this rel­at­ively minor neg­ative, From the Sky Down is loaded with pos­it­ives that make it essen­tial viewing for any U2 fan.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Pearl Jam Twenty

Pearl Jam Twenty (Director: Cameron Crowe): Director Cameron Crowe revisits his rock journ­alist past with Pearl Jam Twenty, a ret­ro­spective of the Seattle band’s career and the first film that was accepted at this year’s fest­ival. The screening I attended came a couple of days after the film’s world premiere and was sand­wiched in between a couple of con­certs in town for the band, so the numerous hard­core fans in attend­ance were exuberant and clearly in the midst of a Toronto Pearl Jam love-in. More casual or “lapsed fans” (such as myself), who lost touch with the group fol­lowing their first decade of megas­tardom, might find them­selves strug­gling to main­tain a heightened level of interest as the story unfolds, however.

That story begins with a pre-grunge band called Mother Love Bone that fea­tured future Pearl Jam mem­bers Jeff Ament (bass) and Stone Gossard (guitar), who go on to form Pearl Jam after the drug over­dose death of Mother Love Bone singer Andrew Wood. Crowe appro­pri­ately handles the material on Wood with del­icacy, but the rev­er­ence afforded the mar­gin­ally tal­ented singer’s unmem­or­able work by his peers is over­stated and com­pletely failed to con­nect with me. Ament and Gossard are left to start over, adding gui­tarist Mike McCready and vocalist Eddie Vedder, who col­lect­ively form the core of the new group. All four mem­bers have stayed together since, with some­what of a revolving door pro­ces­sion of drum­mers that the film humor­ously addresses in a short seg­ment (the pos­i­tion is even­tu­ally sta­bil­ized with the addi­tion of former Soundgarden drummer Matt Cameron). The standard rock doc/Behind The Music fare is covered: the band grap­pling with the effects of their met­eoric rise to fame, group power struggles, striving to stay music­ally rel­evant, and sig­ni­ficant moments from their career, not­ably their noble attempt at taking on Ticketmaster, and the 2000 Roskilde Festival tragedy in Denmark, where nine fans were crushed to death during the band’s set.

Crowe was the bene­fi­ciary of a band that was very for­ward thinking in doc­u­menting their career, allowing him the luxury of having approx­im­ately 1200 hours of archival footage at his dis­posal. Much of it is rare or pre­vi­ously unseen, such as the clip (long rumoured to exist among Pearl Jam and Nirvana fans) of Vedder meeting sup­posed rival Kurt Cobain at the 1992 MTV Video Music Awards. As Vedder explains it, the two bickered with each other in the press, although the media blew their dis­like for one another far out of pro­por­tion. Other mem­or­able clips include one where Vedder barely man­ages to con­tain his rage toward an overly aggressive security guard during one of their Vancouver shows, plus numerous video examples demon­strating Vedder’s dan­gerous propensity for scaling to the upper levels of various venues while per­forming and launching him­self into the audi­ence. Scattered throughout the film are Crowe-shot live per­form­ances, including a ver­sion of “Alive” that only served to remind me that if I never hear that, or any of the other singles off their over­played debut album again, it’ll be too soon. Band inter­views reveal indi­viduals who come across a little less ser­ious than is prob­ably their public per­cep­tion, which is prob­ably because Vedder, who appears to have mel­lowed with age, was more than insuf­fer­able enough for the entire band.

I prob­ably expected more out of Pearl Jam Twenty, just because a big-name dir­ector like Crowe was at the helm. He does a thor­ough, com­petent job in presenting the band’s col­ourful story, an integral part of which has been their desire to diverge from the status quo career path that rock bands are sup­posed to take, but the film fails to stand out in the rock doc­u­mentary sub-genre.

Pearl Jam Twenty received a world­wide one-time only the­at­rical screening on September 20th. It will be broad­cast on the PBS American Masters series on October 21st, fol­lowed by a DVD and Blu-Ray release on October 25th.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Trigger

by Monika Bartyzel on August 25, 2011

in Actors,DVD

Trigger
This post comes cour­tesy of Monika Bartyzel, freel­ance writer and junkie of Canadian cinema, fre­quently seen at Movies.com and pre­vi­ously sites such as Cinematical and Moviefone.ca. I’m hoping to con­vince her to con­tribute more of her insightful writing in the future.
Trigger (Director: Bruce McDonald): Trigger is a love letter – a love letter to Toronto, to growing old, to memories, to music, and – most import­antly – to the late Tracy Wright. It’s a film with dual mean­ings – the story as it lives out in the film, and the real world in sub­text. Luckily, it’s not one where reality trumps fic­tion or fic­tion obscures reality. Instead, coin­cid­ental cir­cum­stance merges both in a way that works beau­ti­fully as a tale of weathered friend­ship as well as a show­case for the many tal­ents of Wright.

For the unini­ti­ated: In 2008, Canadian film­maker Bruce McDonald re-watched My Dinner with Andre, and was itching to do a bare­bones piece using the same discussion-over-dinner style. He lured scribe Daniel MacIvor with the idea, who in turn con­vinced the film­maker that it should break out of one loc­a­tion and become the story of two men out in Toronto. It became two women, Tracy Wright was invited to par­ti­cipate, and when she learned that she had six months to live, the film was fast-tracked and shot with aston­ishing indie speed, becoming one of her last films.

The world of Trigger is simple. Two women (Wright’s Vic and Molly Parker’s Kat), who haven’t seen each other for years, meet for dinner. Vic is the aging rocker who has kept the bare-bones life­style, and struggles to bal­ance her own cyn­icism with her quest for spir­itual relief. Kat is the rocker-gone-mainstream-success, the woman who puts on a show but yearns for the hon­esty of her pre­vious life. Within moments, their inner dams are broken and skel­etons start climbing out of their psyches – addic­tion, pain, betrayal, feel­ings of use­less­ness… Each woman is the knowing face of the other’s past, both the only person who can really under­stand them and the exact person who is too dan­gerous to see. It’s impossible for either to main­tain false civility as their inner demons are released, teasing both danger and catharsis.

The Andre-ish start quickly bubbles into a Before Sunset struc­ture as the women step out­side and tra­verse the city over the course of one night. Each locale – res­taurant, home, club – seems to bring out a new rev­el­a­tion, many of which have an eerie sim­il­arity to Wright’s real world out­side of the film. (A sim­il­arity that MacIvor assures is a coin­cid­ence.) The pair dis­cuss addic­tion, friend­ship, fam­ilies, work, life, mor­tality, and all of the minu­tiae and drama that clutch onto our lives.

These moments seems incred­ibly intimate to real life while also being per­fectly con­tained in the film, existing as a nat­ural form of method acting rather than moments where real life rips atten­tion away from the fic­tional film. They are much like the scenes in Before Sunset when Ethan Hawke’s Jesse talks about his mar­ital dis­con­tent, soon after his own real-life mar­riage dis­solved. While the stories aren’t the same, the emo­tional truth is, and unleashing just that little amount of real-life pain gives the fic­tional journey all the more weight – the pres­ence of real, never-to-be-released tears trumping care­fully planned crying. In fact, that slight blending of fic­tion and reality allow us to feel the wall the act­resses built between them­selves and the material, which in the con­text of Trigger, feels like the char­ac­ters’ own safety mechanisms.

Bruce McDonald’s straight­for­ward film­making is an apt com­panion to their inter­per­sonal explor­a­tion. There are no stun­ning visuals or slick cam­er­a­work to make this feel like a big pro­duc­tion. The camera just lurks, almost voyeur­ist­ic­ally cap­turing the exper­i­ence, and rather than con­trolling our atten­tion, it’s all up to the act­resses – par­tic­u­larly Wright. When the cine­matic moments are closest to real life and Wright speaks, the camera is con­tent to stay on her, lov­ingly but also quietly mes­mer­ized, just like those times when we get so caught up in a moment or piece of beauty that the rest of the world, the screen, or the film fades away. Instead of a slick package dic­tating our reac­tion with angles, light, and swelling music, it’s up to Wright and Parker to make us feel, which makes each moment that much more real – there’s little between the per­form­ance and the audience.

It helps that everything seems to be a reflec­tion of the other. There is Vic and Tracy Wright – two sep­arate stories that coin­cid­ent­ally come together into a whole, and the glue is the time and place – Toronto. Each loc­a­tion reflects an aspect of the story, from the crisp­ness of a classy res­taurant reflecting the ini­tial false civility of the affair, to a school emphas­izing the fact that you can long for the past, though your cur­rent self can never fit into it. Wright was an important piece of the indie film and theatre scene in the city, and Trigger man­ages to express her moments in time as well as her tal­ents – not the glitz and glam but the hands-on, dirty, cre­ative energy.

Each piece inter­mingles with the rest and con­tinues to flow back and forth between all these aspects in a way that could only work as well in that time, place, and cir­cum­stance. When Vic says “I don’t care about the des­tin­a­tion; I’m more con­cerned about the velo­city,” it speaks as much to real life as it does to the plot’s exper­i­ence and the nature of nos­talgia in both the city and beyond. It speaks to growing old, to strug­gling to find a place, to set­tling, to con­vin­cing your­self that the false is good, to trying to find faith, and most cer­tainly to let an act­ress thrive in a role she wasn’t usu­ally awarded, while giving her a vehicle to express some of her final moments in time.

As a DVD treat­ment, how­ever, one can’t help but wonder (or hope) if this release is the place­holder before a spe­cial edi­tion. The film is pack­aged with two all-too-brief “extras” – a few short clips of the table read the actors did before the film, and a trailer for TO in 24, the latter of which isn’t clearly explained to be a trailer (it’s titled “One Breath”), and seems like a random short film slapped on to fill space.

Obviously, this film is min­im­alist and there likely wasn’t the budget for spe­cial fea­tures like a making-of, a ret­ro­spective of Wright’s work, a look at the Toronto musical talent fea­tured in the film, or other highly pro­duced goodies. That said, there are a myriad of options that could have bolstered the release that would have taken much less effort – a brief blip from the filmmakers/collaborators about Wright, her filmo­graphy and bio­graphy, the TIFF Q&A’s, or even Don McKellar’s letter to friends upon her death, which was sub­sequently pub­lished for the fans who mourned her. As a pro­duc­tion that came together in a shock­ingly brief amount of time, Trigger is at least beg­ging for a com­mentary or two, to talk about how all of this came together, and how they pulled it off so fast and so well.

Perhaps in the future. For now, how­ever, I urge you to watch the film, and use the links below as your spe­cial features.

eOne released Trigger on DVD in Canada on July 26, 2011. Help sup­port Toronto Screen Shots by buying it on Amazon.ca.

Earlier Work:

The Letter Don McKellar Wrote to Friends After Her Death:

Q&A from TIFF 2010 Premiere

Daniel MacIvor Writes about Tracy:

In Memoriam:

Notes on Her Memorial:

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Love Shines

Love Shines (Director: Doug Arrowsmith): Love Shines is a first-rate, in-depth por­trait of acclaimed Toronto singer-songwriter Ron Sexsmith. Director Arrowsmith, a hard­core Sexsmith devotee, avoids turning his film into a fanboy gush­fest; instead, he unabashedly presents the singer with all of his flaws nakedly on dis­play. Sexsmith is a pain­fully insecure and intro­verted indi­vidual – your classic “tor­tured artist”, as it were – and it’s sur­prising how much access into his life he gives Arrowsmith, in whom he clearly put a great deal of trust. Shot over the course of seven years, the doc­u­mentary was ori­gin­ally con­ceived to stop filming after Sexsmith’s then career high of head­lining at Toronto’s famed Massey Hall, back in 2006. Instead, Arrowsmith kept shooting, which presented the oppor­tunity to chron­icle the recording of Sexsmith’s twelfth album, Long Player Late Bloomer. Those recording ses­sions, which provide some intriguing insight into Sexsmith’s cre­ative pro­cess, are the centrepiece of Love Shines, and the film is sig­ni­fic­antly better because of it.

Sexsmith, for those unfa­miliar with his career (and I counted myself in that group before watching the doc­u­mentary), has been a per­en­nial critics’ favourite since his debut solo album came out in 1995 (he released an album four years prior as a member of Toronto indie band The Uncool). Peers such as Elvis Costello, Steve Earle, Leslie Feist, and Daniel Lanois have been singing his praises for years and do so throughout the film. In fact, Costello, one of Sexsmith’s biggest cham­pions, equates his skill for cre­ating melodies to that of Paul McCartney. Despite the accol­ades, Sexsmith still sells a paltry number of albums, which is a con­stant source of angst for him. The ongoing struggle with main­taining artistic integ­rity while seeking main­stream suc­cess informs much of the nar­rative in Love Shines, leading to the enlist­ment of mega-producer Bob Rock to oversee the recording of Long Player Late Bloomer. Rock is primarily known as a hard rock/metal pro­ducer, based on his earlier work on a number of hugely suc­cessful albums from the likes of Bon Jovi, Motley Crue, and The Cult. Most not­ably, he was Metallica’s exclusive pro­ducer for 12 years and is more than used to working with an artist and having their every move filmed, as was the case for the fant­astic doc on the band, Some Kind Of Monster. In recent years, he’s diver­si­fied his scope to include acts such as Nina Gordon, The Tragically Hip, and Michael Bublé. Sexsmith hopes the pairing will raise his pro­file via the pure name recog­ni­tion that the pro­ducer brings, as well as increase album sales by way of the more com­mer­cially pal­at­able and highly pol­ished sound that Rock gets from the artists he works with. A stellar group of vet­eran musi­cians is brought on board to play on the album, including drummer Josh Freese (Nine Inch Nails, A Perfect Circle), gui­tarist Rusty Anderson (Paul McCartney), bassist Paul Bushnell (Elton John, Sugarland), and key­boardist Jamie Edwards (Aimee Mann).

Periodic and intro­spective glimpses back into Sexsmith’s upbringing reveal a shy young­ster who struggled with his con­fid­ence and endured abuse from bul­lies while growing up in St. Catharines, Ontario, even­tu­ally becoming a father at age 19 after get­ting his girl­friend preg­nant at the same moment he lost his vir­ginity. Certain mile­stones from Sexsmith’s career are shown, including a home movie scene where we see his par­ents, watching the 2002 Juno Awards on their home tele­vi­sion, become ecstatic over his win for Songwriter of the Year. In it, his mother is seen excitedly taking pic­tures of the TV screen as her son wins the award, appar­ently unclear of how a VCR works. It’s one of the fun­niest (and sweetest) moments in the film. “Funny” is not exactly a word anyone would asso­ciate with Sexsmith him­self. In his inter­views with Arrowsmith, he comes across as a fra­gile, depressed, and lacking con­fid­ence, which reminded me of a line from Bruce Springsteen’s “Better Days”: “It’s a sad man, my friend, who’s livin’ in his own skin and can’t stand the com­pany.” Most of the theatre audi­ence stuck around for the post-screening Q&A ses­sion with Sexsmith and Arrowsmith, and I must say I felt down­right hor­rible that I had to leave about halfway through to catch my last Hot Docs screening uptown. As I con­spicu­ously des­cended the stairs and walked across the front of the theatre, past the singer to the exit, I couldn’t help but worry that Sexsmith was tap­ping into his ever-present insec­ur­ities and won­dering why someone wasn’t inter­ested in hearing what he had to say. Does that make me nar­ciss­istic or empathetic?

Early indic­a­tions (it came out in March) indicate that Long Player Late Bloomer won’t propel Sexsmith to sig­ni­fic­antly new heights of com­mer­cial suc­cess. The album actu­ally turned out to be a hard sell to pro­spective music labels, with some iron­ic­ally rejecting it as being too main­stream. Still, it should improve on the sales num­bers from his last sev­eral albums and this film (which is now airing on HBO Canada) should help him find a new audi­ence. Whether it’s the excel­lent music, fin­an­cial struggles that one wouldn’t expect a “name” musi­cian to face, the strange dicho­tomy of a guy who hates the spot­light but per­forms in it for a living, or just the fact that Sexsmith makes for a great underdog story, non-fans will find plenty in Love Shines to hold their interest.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }