korea

Aachi and Ssipak (Achi-wa ssipak)

Aachi and Ssipak (Achi-wa ssipak) (Director: Jo Beom-jin): There’s not much point in trying to ana­lyze a film about a dystopic future world where the source of energy is human feces, but I can say that this anim­ated fea­ture from Korea was loads of fun. Our tit­ular char­ac­ters are a couple of lowlifes trying to get by in this miser­able future by stealing juicy­bars, the government’s reward for each citizen’s, uh, con­tri­bu­tion to the energy supply. The fact that these druggy pops­icles are highly addictive has cre­ated some prob­lems, not least of which is the emer­gence of a whole swarm of addicts whose bodies can no longer pro­duce the required material. These smurf-like creatures band together to form the Diaper Gang and ter­rorize the police and anyone else trying to con­trol the supply. The plot is a little more com­plic­ated, but this basic premise means lots of action scenes between the police, the Diaper Gang and our heroes. Ssipak’s infatu­ation with a porn star with prodi­gious pooping abil­ities leads them into a rescue mis­sion, since she’s been kid­napped by the Diaper Gang. If it all sounds ridicu­lous, it is, but you have to give the film­makers some credit for ori­gin­ality. Some of the best parts of this film (and any film which sat­ir­izes the future) were the mock ads and public ser­vice announce­ments telling people how to max­imize their poop. This foul-mouthed, polit­ic­ally incor­rect, scata­logical and glee­fully violent film is prob­ably not suit­able for actual chil­dren, but it will appeal to the stunted adoles­cent that lives within most of us.

Trailer (no subtitles)

English sub­titled DVD avail­able from YesAsia.com (Region 3 NTSC)

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Secret Sunshine (Milyang)

Secret Sunshine (Milyang) (Director: Lee Chang-dong): Jeon Do-yeon gives a breath­taking per­form­ance as Shin-ae, a recently wid­owed young mother who takes her son to live in her late husband’s hometown, hoping for a fresh start. Instead, a new tragedy plunges her fur­ther into grief. Although to some, this may sound like just the sort of “film fest­ival” film to avoid, it was never less than com­pel­ling, des­pite its 142 minute run time.

Possible Spoiler Alert: Despite the fact that every review I’ve read dis­cusses the plot points I’m about to reveal, I thought it would be fair to warn you.

It’s clear that Shin-ae is already an isol­ated figure even before she moves to a new town. Her husband’s death in a car acci­dent doesn’t seem to be the only reason she wants a fresh start. She leaves without telling her own family, to whom she seems estranged. Her only joy is in her young son, Jun. As she estab­lishes her­self as a piano teacher in her new sur­round­ings, we learn a bit more. She had mar­ried young, pre­sum­ably to get out of her family’s house­hold. Her hus­band had cheated on her. Her brother seems to want to stay in touch. And then there’s Jong-chan, the goofy local mech­anic who’s developed a major crush on her. Despite his sin­cere attrac­tion, she tries to keep him at arm’s length. He’s 39 and unmar­ried, which makes him a figure of fun to his friends. But touch­ingly, he con­tinues to watch over Shin-ae, and when her son is kid­napped and later found dead, he’s there to offer sup­port. But she doesn’t seem to notice.

Secret Sunshine (Milyang)

The film is really a journey into the hell that is grief. Though the first loss seemed only to stagger her, the loss of her child threatens to sweep her away. In a des­perate attempt to hold off the full force of her grief, and the pain that is phys­ic­ally weighing her down, she joins an evan­gel­ical church. God and the believers are offering her com­fort, even healing, and she snatches at the chance. It seems to work for a little while, and she decides to visit her son’s killer in prison, to offer him her for­give­ness. But when she arrives, she finds out that he too has found faith, that God has already for­given his sins, and that jars her tenuous belief.

At this point, we begin to sur­mise that Shin-ae’s rela­tion­ship with her father may have been one of abuse, and her anger at God seems to become entwined with her feel­ings for her own father. In her sudden dis­il­lu­sion­ment with Christianity, she lashes out in ways both funny (her sab­otage of a prayer meeting’s sound system) and cruel (her seduc­tion of a church elder). Several times during these des­perate acts, she looks up to the heavens and asks, “Can you see me?”

All along, the com­fort and love she’s longing for are under her nose. Jong-chan (played with won­derful gen­tle­ness by The Host’s Song Kang-ho) waits patiently, picking up the pieces at every turn. He even joins the church for her, which leads to sev­eral comic moments. It might be tempting to think that the film is cri­ti­cizing Christianity, but in hind­sight, the devo­tion and self­less­ness shown by Jong-chan is prob­ably the closest thing to the ideal of Christian love in the entire film. Which is not to say he’s a saint. He’s lonely, too, but his determ­in­a­tion that they are right for each other is touching and in the end, we hope, convincing.

The film could very well have been entitled “A New Life,” for that’s what Shin-ae is seeking all along. At the end, it’s not all resolved. She’s gone through hell, and might have to go through more, but there is a little bit of hope. The name of the town, we’re told early in the film, is derived from the Chinese for “secret sun­shine.” By the closing frames, we’re hoping Shin-ae can see it.

Trailer
Official Site

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Host

by James McNally on September 11, 2006

in Film Festivals,TIFF

The Host

The Host (Korea, dir­ector Bong Joon-ho): A huge box office hit in Korea, The Host is a good old-fashioned mon­ster movie, and a lot more. The dir­ector intro­duced the screening by saying that the film isn’t really a mon­ster movie at all, but an emo­tional Korean family drama, and he’s right, mostly.

The family in ques­tion is a strange one. There are no mothers and no spouses, just a grand­father, his three unmar­ried chil­dren, and the daughter of his eldest son, whose mother aban­doned her shortly after she was born. The grand­father and eldest son run a food stand next to the Han River, and one day, a gigantic lizard-like mon­ster emerges from the water and attacks the people pic­nicking along the riverb­anks. In the pro­cess, 13-year-old Hyun-seo is car­ried off before the hor­ri­fied eyes of her father Kang-du. The family grieves together in the hos­pital to where they’ve all been quar­ant­ined until Kang-du receives a staticky cell-phone call from his daughter, who is alive and beg­ging him to come and rescue her from the monster’s lair, some­where in the sewer system.

The reason for the quar­antine is that the gov­ern­ment believes the mon­ster is car­rying some sort of virus and are trying to limit exposure to the rest of the city. The problem is that they’ve called back all the troops that they’d first sent to cap­ture the mon­ster, and now it falls to this dys­func­tional family to find their child. After breaking out of the hos­pital, the whole group embarks on a search and rescue mis­sion armed only with a couple of rifles and sister Nam-ju’s bow (she’s a bronze medal-winning archer). They’re all inef­fec­tual in unique ways. While Nam-ju (Bae Doo-Na, so great in last year’s Linda Linda Linda) is an excel­lent archer, she’s slow to take aim, which cost her the gold medal. Brother Nam-il is a uni­ver­sity graduate who can’t find work, so he’s turned to booze. And Kang-du is just gen­er­ally lazy and a bit dim-witted.

There is quite a bit of humour in the way the family mem­bers interact, as well as a fair bit of social and polit­ical satire at the expense of both the Korean and U.S. gov­ern­ments (the Americans are blamed for dumping toxic waste that cre­ated the mon­ster in the first place). This was amusing, though pretty heavy-handed.

The cine­ma­to­graphy made use of lots of rain and cloudy skies to convey the claus­tro­phobic feeling of the sewers even when we weren’t actu­ally there. In fact, the only sunny skies in the film occur just before the monster’s first appearance.

While I did find the film enjoy­able, I felt it ran a bit long, and stretched cred­ib­ility a few times too many. It’s a mon­ster movie, after all, so maybe I shouldn’t have had such high expect­a­tions. The effects are well-done and it was cer­tainly fun to watch, but it’s not an art film by any stretch of the ima­gin­a­tion. The theme seemed to be that even dys­func­tional fam­ilies are still fam­ilies, and that we need to take care of each other and not expect our gov­ern­ments to pro­tect or rescue us.

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

They Chose China

They Chose China (Canada, 2005, Director: Shui-Bo Wang, 52 minutes): An utterly com­pel­ling look at a for­gotten group of US pris­oners of war who refused to be repat­ri­ated to the United States after the Korean War. At the time, these 20-odd sol­diers were branded “turn­coats and traitors” by red-baiting Senator Joseph McCarthy. In archival films, we see them making state­ments against Senator McCarthy and the cur­rent polit­ical cli­mate in America, and although many of these archival films seem to have been cre­ated for pro­pa­ganda reasons by the Chinese, the men claim that they were never mis­treated in the prisoner-of-war camps. In fact, we see them organ­izing games and sports, even an “Inter-Camp Olympics”! Of course, having these men stay in China was a huge pro­pa­ganda coup and they were quickly sent for “edu­ca­tion” on the his­tory of socialism and the Chinese Communist Party. Despite that, some stayed and even mar­ried in China. Gradually, most of the men returned to the United States, where they faced courts mar­tial and scorn from the media and public.

It was a strange and almost for­gotten episode in the Cold War and there is still a lot of ambi­guity about what really motiv­ated the men to stay. At the time, the American media spec­u­lated that they had been brain­washed (like in The Manchurian Candidate), but it didn’t appear that simple. It was just as clear that when the men returned home, the media used them in its own sort of pro­pa­ganda war. One man’s inter­view with Mike Wallace was painful to watch, as Wallace con­tinued to use the term “turn­coat and traitor” over and over again. They were very dif­ferent times.

The director’s voice over, in Chinese-accented English, was some­times a little dif­fi­cult to follow, but he did make clear that he con­sidered these men heroes for trying to build bridges between enemies, and I’d tend to agree with that sen­ti­ment, even with so many ques­tions left unanswered.

More inform­a­tion on the film from the National Film Board of Canada

8/10(8/10)

EYE Weekly: *** (out of 5) (review)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }