Posts tagged as:

#hotdocs08

Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father

Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father (2008, Director: Kurt Kuenne): Messy and unapo­lo­get­ic­ally manip­u­lative, Dear Zachary feels quite a bit like the grieving pro­cess itself. Equal parts schmaltz and rage, it accur­ately reflects the feel­ings of its cre­ator, still coming to terms with the loss of his child­hood friend.

Kurt Kuenne’s ori­ginal plan for the film was to doc­u­ment his friend Andrew Bagby’s life for Bagby’s young son Zachary. Andrew, a prom­ising young med­ical doctor, was gunned down by an ex-girlfriend and col­league, Dr. Shirley Turner, who then fled to her native Canada to avoid pro­sec­u­tion. Some time later, she revealed that she was preg­nant with Andrew’s child. If that bizarre setup wasn’t enough, the tale soon becomes even more strange as Andrew’s grieving par­ents move from the US to Newfoundland to be near their grandson, hoping that they’ll be able to obtain cus­tody when Turner is even­tu­ally con­victed of the crime.

To say that things don’t go as expected would be a huge under­state­ment. By the end, the film will leave you emo­tion­ally drained, angry, and grieving, along with Kuenne and Andrew’s amazing par­ents. This is an intensely per­sonal film, with a few warts, but it’s heart­felt and honest, and as a tribute to his friend, is some­thing that Kuenne can be proud of.

UPDATE: I had the hardest time writing about this film back when I first saw it at Hot Docs in the spring. I wanted to bring your atten­tion to it now that it’s get­ting a the­at­rical release. Watch for it in New York City tomorrow, October 31, with a rol­lout to some other US cities in the weeks to follow. No word on a Canadian release yet.

Official site for the film

Interview with dir­ector Kurt Kuenne

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Second Sight

Second Sight (2008, Director: Alison McAlpine): Through the wit and charm of near-80 Donald Angus MacLean, film­maker Alison McAlpine explores the oral tra­di­tion in northern Scotland on the Isle of Skye. Donald “Angie” is quite a char­acter, an enter­taining rogue with an eye for the ladies and an ear for a good story. A former preacher, Donald drives around the town in his red car (his name written across the trunk), his dog in the pas­senger seat, vis­iting a few of the island’s even more enter­taining char­ac­ters. These res­id­ents reveal their stories of pre­mon­i­tions, spectres and ghost cars. Their ability to see what is unseen, known as second sight, is set against the hills, moors and mist that make up the island. However, these are not simply ghost stories—at least, that’s what the res­id­ents would have you believe. They tell their tales in earnest, retelling them as if what they wit­nessed happened only hours earlier. McAlpine cer­tainly cap­tures the overall eeri­ness of the sub­ject while at the same time framing the beau­tiful land­scape that is Scotland north. With a few laughs along the way, Second Sight will make you think twice about the things you cannot see.

Official site of the film

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

At The Death House Door

At The Death House Door (2008, Directors: Steve James and Peter Gilbert): Directors Steve James and Peter Gilbert won were nom­in­ated for an Oscar for their work together on Hoop Dreams in 1995, and I wouldn’t be at all sur­prised if their latest col­lab­or­a­tion isn’t recog­nized with at least a nom­in­a­tion at Oscar time next year. At the Death House Door intro­duces us to Reverend Carroll “Bud” Pickett, a retired Presbyterian min­ister in Huntsville, Texas. As he recounts, Huntsville used to be known for the rodeo, but over the past forty years or so, it’s become famous for all of its prisons. Reverend Pickett never intended to become a prison chap­lain, but that’s what he ended up doing. For 15 years during the 80s and 90s, he served as the “death house” chap­lain, the man with whom con­demned pris­oners spent their last day on earth. He would sit with them during the day, listen to whatever they wanted to say, eat their last meal with them, and, when the time came, just after mid­night, accom­pany them the short walk into the room where they would be strapped down and leth­ally injected. Reverend Pickett did this 95 times, and after each exe­cu­tion, he came home and recorded an audio cas­sette with his thoughts. Unable to share the pain of this min­istry with his family, and pre­vented by his hard Texas upbringing from crying freely, he poured his heart out for the tape recorder instead. Remarkably, with a few excep­tions, he had never listened to these tapes again after making them.

Meanwhile, Maury Possley and Steve Mills, a pair of invest­ig­ative reporters from the Chicago Tribune had begun writing a series about pos­sible cases of wrongful exe­cu­tion. One of the stories they uncovered was that of Carlos DeLuna, a young man from Corpus Christi, Texas, who was con­victed of the 1982 stabbing death of a gas sta­tion attendant. The police found him hiding under a truck shortly after the stabbing, and although he had no blood on him at all, and claimed inno­cence, he was arrested, tried, and con­victed. DeLuna main­tained his inno­cence and claimed that an acquaint­ance, Carlos Hernandez, was respons­ible for the killing, although no one, even his law­yers, listened. In 1989, he was executed at the young age of 27. Reverend Pickett was with him when he died, and des­pite claims that lethal injec­tion is quick and pain­less, he reported that DeLuna didn’t respond to the first drug, a sed­ative, and took 11 long minutes to die.

Possley and Mills visit with Pickett and dis­cover his archive of tapes. He tells them that of all the pris­oners he knew, DeLuna was the one that he was con­vinced was com­pletely inno­cent. Over the years, the strain of the job had nagged him, but espe­cially the notion that he was party to the exe­cu­tion of an inno­cent man. Although he had been a strong pro­ponent of the death pen­alty when he started the job, after accom­pa­nying so many men to the death chamber, his opinion had com­pletely changed. Whether they were guilty or inno­cent, Pickett cher­ished the time spent with the men, even as it strained him to be so power­less over their fates.

We spend the majority of the film with Reverend Pickett, cer­tainly a fas­cin­ating char­acter, but there are some other char­ac­ters, including DeLuna’s sister Rose, who still lives with the guilt that she should have done more. Pickett also intro­duces us to a younger col­league who worked as a death house guard until the strain of working in an insti­tu­tional death factory drove him to a break­down. Texas has executed more pris­oners than any other state and it’s clear that cap­ital pun­ish­ment is not deter­ring anyone. Not only that, it’s cre­ating more vic­tims as we see the fam­ilies of pris­oners suffer. Worse, it dehu­man­izes everyone involved in the pro­cess, from the pris­oner him­self to the prison guards and chap­lains who work for the state.

In one chilling scene, the camera floats around the prison as Texas executes its 400th pris­oner. We watch from a dis­tance as the man’s family are allowed access into the prison for their last visit, and then we see the guards bringing out the man’s per­sonal effects in bags and dumping them out­side the gates like so much garbage. Soon the man’s body will be taken out in much the same way. It’s heartbreaking.

Even as he came to strongly dis­agree with cap­ital pun­ish­ment, Reverend Pickett con­tinued his min­istry to these con­demned men, firstly because he “wasn’t a quitter,” but more import­antly, because they needed a friend at this moment, someone who would be there right until the end, even as their fam­ilies were ban­ished. Sadly, he informs us that the Texas prison system recently changed the system. Instead of having 18 hours with the pris­oner, now they’re brought into the death house at 4:00pm, showered, fed, and then executed at 6:00pm. The chap­lain barely has time to say a few words. One won­ders if this change is meant to inflict even more pain on the pris­oner, denying them any mean­ingful human con­tact at all.

At the Death House Door is deeply med­it­ative, due in major part to the char­acter of Reverend Pickett, a man who has been indelibly marked by his work. It has made him ques­tion his politics, his opin­ions, even his faith. It has estranged him at times from his wife and his chil­dren. But he made these sac­ri­fices because he truly believes no one should die alone. Wherever you stand on the ques­tion of cap­ital pun­ish­ment, this film will make you think about the people we ask to do the unthinkable.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ectors Steve James and Peter Gilbert from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 16:25

Offical site of the film
IFC’s Screening Party Kit
Trailer

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Man On Wire

Man On Wire (2008, Director: James Marsh): Winner of both the Grand Jury Prize: World Cinema Documentary and the World Cinema Audience Award: Documentary at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, James Marsh’s stun­ning film brings an inex­plic­ably obscure story to life in a fresh and exhil­ar­ating way.

On August 7, 1974, a young French wire­walker named Philippe Petit spent 45 minutes sus­pended on a wire between the two towers of the World Trade Center. He made eight cross­ings before the police con­vinced him to return to safety. Though this story, according to the dir­ector, is part of New York City folk­lore, not many people out­side the city seem to know any­thing about it. But what a fant­astic story, and Marsh does a mas­terful job in telling it, mostly by let­ting Petit and his com­pan­ions bring it to life.

Petit is a fas­cin­ating figure. An accom­plished jug­gler, wire­walker, and pick­pocket(!), he had sup­ported him­self since his teens by working as a street per­former. A born storyteller, he brings the nar­rative alive, even almost 35 years after his great “coup.” But best of all, Marsh gathers all Petit’s accom­plices as well and has each of them recount their own part in the story. Some were stead­fast, like his lover Annie and his child­hood friend Jean-Louis, and others fickle and cow­ardly, like Americans David Foreman and Alan Welner, who both abandon the quest at the cru­cial moment. All tell their stories can­didly and all still seem envel­oped in wonder that such a thing could be accomplished.

Man On Wire

Petit and some of his com­pan­ions had already planned and executed two other auda­cious feats of wire­walking, first at the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and then on the Sydney Harbour Bridge in Australia. But the Twin Towers had obsessed Petit ever since he’d read about plans to build them, and the team’s pre­par­a­tions are car­ried out like the plan­ning of a bank heist, with one important dif­fer­ence. As con­spir­ator Jean-Francois says, “It may have been illegal…but it wasn’t wicked or mean.”

Marsh art­fully com­bines lively inter­views (espe­cially when Petit is on screen) with stills and film from each of the various events, and even some re-creations (which he later admitted were part of someone else’s aborted film on the sub­ject). A haunting and beau­tiful score by Michael Nyman (com­poser for many of Peter Greenaway’s films) and fea­turing music by Erik Satie, among others, cre­ated the dream­like atmo­sphere neces­sary to appre­ciate this beau­tiful “art crime.”

Of course, it would be impossible to see a film fea­turing the Twin Towers without thinking of the events of 9/11. Marsh wisely avoids making any con­nec­tions, let­ting the footage of the build­ings’ con­struc­tion speak poignantly for itself. Petit’s feat seems even more won­drous when you con­sider that the fra­gile Frenchman sur­vives while the mighty towers lie in ruins.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector James Marsh from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 11:00

UPDATE: Mongrel Media will be releasing the DVD of the film in Canada on Tuesday December 9.

Official site for the film
Video inter­view with dir­ector James Marsh and wire­walker Philippe Petit at Sundance 2008

10/10(10/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Virtual JFK: Vietnam If Kennedy Had Lived

Virtual JFK: Vietnam If Kennedy Had Lived (2008, Director: Koji Masutani): This film is some­what awkardly titled. It’s not a re-creation of an alternate timeline where JFK sur­vives. Rather, it’s a carefully-argued essay whose thesis is that, based on the way John F. Kennedy dealt with sev­eral mil­itary crises early in his pres­id­ency, he would not have escal­ated the war in Vietnam and that per­haps the tragedy of almost 60,000 American dead (not to men­tion 2,000,000 Vietnamese) could have been averted.

Narrated and written by Professor James Blight of the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, who was Errol Morris’ advisor on The Fog of War, Virtual JFK exam­ines six dif­ferent crises faced by the young pres­ident in his abbre­vi­ated time in office. Two involved Cuba (the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961 and the Cuban mis­sile crisis in 1962), one was European (the con­struc­tion of the Berlin wall in 1961), and the other three involved Southeast Asia (two con­front­a­tions over Vietnam, one over Laos). In every case, Kennedy stared down the hawks in his admin­is­tra­tion and the mil­itary com­manders who were advoc­ating war. In every case, his cau­tion avoided cata­strophe, most not­ably in the Cuban mis­sile crisis, which many his­tor­ians believe was the closest the world ever came to nuc­lear war. Blight has every reason to believe that Kennedy would have pre­vailed on the sub­ject of Vietnam as well. What he doesn’t dis­cuss is the pos­sib­ility that this had any­thing to do with JFK’s assas­sin­a­tion, although that hypo­thesis has been cir­cu­lated by more than a few people.

Overall, this was enjoy­able and well-argued, but not excep­tional. On a per­sonal level, I enjoyed seeing so much footage of Kennedy’s press con­fer­ences. His cha­risma is clearly evident in his good-natured exchanges with journ­al­ists, even when he was under con­sid­er­able stress. It also sur­prised me how much Kennedy had to deal with in such a short time. The world was going through some major upheavals, and we’re for­tu­nate that Kennedy was guiding a rest­less America with such a steady hand. This film shows us how much more tragic his death was than we may have believed. Apart from all the usual sen­ti­mental stuff about Camelot and the loss of hope, America lost a man of cau­tion who had been a war­rior of peace.

Incidentally, some reviewers have com­plained that the film makes a blunt par­allel with George W. Bush and his hand­ling of the Iraq war, but the con­nec­tion is never made overtly. In the times we’re living in, how­ever, it’s hard not to find a cri­tique almost every­where we look.

Official site of the film
Watson Institute for International Studies page on the film
Trailer

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }