If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

For the first time, the winner of the Toronto Film Critics Association award for Best Canadian Film will also receive a cheque for $10,000, thanks to sponsor Rogers Communications. The award will be one of a slate of honours handed out at the 11th annual TFCA Awards Dinner, to be held January 6, 2009 at swish Toronto restaurant Nota Bene. All Canadian features released theatrically in 2008 are eligible for the cash prize.

Apparently, the annual dinner is being opened up to the industry and the media for the first time, although I’m not quite sure what that means to film bloggers like me. Are we media, industry, or critics ourselves? Either way, it’s unlikely that I’ll be noshing with this year’s host Cameron Bailey or the presenter of the award for Best Canadian Film, Sarah Polley, who was last year’s winner (alas, without the cash) for her directorial debut, Away from Her.

Award categories include Best Picture, Best Male Performance, Best Female Performance, Best Supporting Male Performance, Best Supporting Female Performance, Best Director, Best Screenplay, Best Canadian Film, Best First Feature, Best Animated Feature, Best Foreign Language Film and Best Documentary Feature.

Nominations will be announced on December 17th, including the three finalists for Best Canadian Film.

This is just the beginning of awards season, so I won’t get into any guessing games about the bulk of the awards, but as far as the single Canadian film to be honoured, how about Tout est parfait (Everything’s Fine), directed by Yves Christian Fournier? (UPDATE: I watched the film and have posted my review. Though it’s a solid enough film, I suspect it will be eclipsed by another film from Québec, C’est pas moi, je le jure! (It’s Not Me, I Swear!), mentioned by Matt MacKinnon in the comments.)

I’m realizing that “feature” probably excludes docs, but I’m not completely sure. As well, it’s often difficult to determine what qualifies a film as “Canadian”. How much of the production has to be funded by Canadian partners? What about films that have Canadian subject matter? Maybe someone can enlighten me.

Not being a particularly astute observer of Canadian films, I’m bound to be missing most of them. What Canadian film from 2008 would you honour with a $10,000 cash prize?

P.S. Hey TFCA, how about updating that web site a bit more often?!

{ 3 comments }

Le Tueur (The Killer)

Le Tueur (The Killer) (2007, Director: Cédric Anger): Dimitry is a hitman visiting Paris with a simple assignment: kill businessman Leo Zimmerman. Only Leo has figured it out and confronts Dimitry before he can do the job, offering him a strange “deal.” If he gives him a few more days to get his financial affairs in order so that his young daughter can be taken care of, he’ll cooperate fully in his own murder. From there, the twists the plot takes make it impossible for me to provide any more synopsis.

By the end, though, you’ll have more sympathy for the hitman, who is able to somehow transcend his grim profession to commit at least one good deed, and maybe more.

Gilbert Melki as Leo
Le Tueur (The Killer)

This noirish debut from writer-director Cédric Anger doesn’t break any new ground in terms of style or story, but it’s a well-acted and paced study of two different characters. Both Grégoire Colin as Dimitry and Gilbert Melki as Leo are outstanding, with Melki particularly adept at playing a complicated character. Some of the brushtrokes are a little clumsy (the hitman is fatherless, of course; the businessman’s wife is having an affair), a few of the twists don’t make sense, and setting the date of the execution on Christmas Eve was not only over the top, but came out of nowhere, at least for me. But Le Tueur was nevertheless an enjoyable film that builds very slowly and respects the performances of its actors.

Grégoire Colin as Dimitry
Le Tueur (The Killer)

Trailer (possible spoilers)

7/10(7/10)

Note: Le Tueur is not only the debut of writer-director Anger, but of Montréal’s Evokative Films, whose founder Stéphanie Trépanier I interviewed recently. The film opens in Toronto on Friday November 28 at the AMC Yonge and Dundas.

{ 2 comments }

Stéphanie Trépanier - Evokative Films

Evokative Films is a brand-new Canadian film distributor founded in early 2008 with a fresh perspective on the distribution business. With a strong online presence (a bilingual blog, YouTube channel and Facebook page), its mission is “to bring clever, entertaining and original international genre features to film enthusiasts across Canada.”

I contacted founder Stéphanie Trépanier, based in Montréal, to find out a little bit more about this exciting new player in the Canadian market.

James McNally (JM): Stéphanie, can you tell us a little bit about yourself and your background and what brought you to start Evokative?

Stéphanie Trépanier (ST): Ah, where to start. Well, I’m a French-Canadian born and raised on the south shore of Montréal. Having parents who travelled, I was raised to be curious about the world and other cultures. From as far back as I can remember, I was always interested in cinema and international film. The smallness of the international section of the local videoclub always depressed me. My little brother was an avid film-watcher too, but more on the horror side. During my teenage years my interest in independent cinema and animation grew and I started going to the Fantasia Festival in its second year. That festival was such a relief, bringing to the screens so many films that we would just never see otherwise.

My parents started their own business in packaging machinery distribution when I was eight years old, in our house’s garage. Over the past 20 years, it has grown to become one of the most important companies in its sector in Canada. Evidently I learned a lot from watching them work and the company grow. I was also involved in the company for a number of years and learned about the many aspects of its administration. But after a while, I realized I needed more passion in my work and that what I really wanted to do was to work in film.

So I quit the day job and went back to school to get a Bachelor’s degree in Public Relations, with a minor in Marketing and some Film classes. I figured PR was going to be my foot in the door of the film industry. While I was still in university I started working for the Fantasia Festival, which was then in its 9th edition and had grown to become one of the major cinematic events in the country. People who don’t think there is an audience for international genre film need to go to Fantasia and see the line-ups of people excited about what they’re about to experience. It made me see how much the genre film audience is curious, passionate and loyal, which makes them the best “customers” there can be, if they are listened and catered to. Which is not always the case in the film industry.

I then went on to work for Christal Films, then a major film distributor in Québec, where I mostly took care of the PR for the English releases. Eventually I got a promotion to the DVD department, and it’s there that the Evokative seed got planted. I was never too sure of the theatrical potential of international genre film, but in DVD it can definitely work. About a year ago, the company started not going so well and I decided it was time I tried going on my own.

Evokative Films

JM: Are you the only employee so far? What are your plans to grow the business in the next year, especially in light of the looming economic recession?

ST: Yes, I’m the only person in the company at the moment, save for my mother who lends me her accounting expertise. But it’s gotten to be too much work lately so I’m actually in the process of hiring an assistant. Distributing films is a lot of work, much more than what can be expected, but I’ll try to keep the team as small as possible. The small overhead is what makes Evokative possible, not having to meet the same numbers the other bigger distributors need to keep things rolling. For sure the looming recession brings some uncertainty and I’ve experienced the weakening dollar, but I think/hope the film industry won’t be too affected. We all need to be entertained when things are not going great!

JM: What’s the focus of the portfolio, other than “genre” films? Do you skew toward thrillers, or horror, or are there plans to cover other genres as well?

ST: The term “genre film” is one that has so many different definitions. For a lot of people, it means horror and thrillers. For me, genre films are films that respond to the rules of a particular genre, but also have an edge. I like diversity, so I intend to have just as much comedies as horror films. I also like it when the genres are mixed. Le Tueur is a thriller, but also a psychological drama. Hansel and Gretel is a fantastic film going towards horror. Adrift in Tokyo is a blend of walking road movie, comedy and human drama. My main focus, when it comes to choosing films for Evokative, is that the film has to be original, clever and entertaining. There will always be a characteristic that will be more important than the others, but the 3 have to be there. It also has to be a film that no other Canadian distributors have been interested in bringing here, but fans of the genre have been asking for, such as Crying Fist and Hazard.

JM: What’s your strategy for theatrical distribution versus DVD? I find genre films (and most other films) are more fun to experience with an audience, on a large screen. Have you been able to build relationships with the cinema chains across the country, or are you focussing on the independent cinemas more?

ST: I totally agree that films are much better to see with an audience, on a large screen. Everybody agrees with that, but less and less people walk the walk, in terms of actually going to see a film in a cinema regularly. So screening films in a theatre has become less and less profitable. Prints and advertising costs are so high that it’s very easy to lose money in the venture. So it is understandable that an increasing number of films are released directly onto DVD.

I’m just beginning, so I have to start a relationship with the theatre owners. I’m going just as much for the chains as for the independent cinemas. What’s important for me is the location of the cinema, the quality of the screen and the comfort of the chairs. For the Montreal release of Le Tueur (The Killer), I went with the Ex-Centris, an independent cinema, and the AMC Forum, a chain. In Toronto it will play at the AMC Yonge and Dundas, which is huge. But for Vancouver I’m looking into one of the Festival Cinemas.

I’ll have about a 50/50 ratio of films going to theatres or going straight to DVD. I don’t really want to get too involved in the high costs, the work and stress a theatrical release brings, but I also want to give the audience a chance to see the film on the big screen. Also, the DVD needs to have some buzz and good reviews to get a proper career, and most of the reviews are obtained through a theatrical release.

Le Tueur (The Killer)

JM: Tell us a little bit about Le Tueur (The Killer), the French thriller that was your first acquisition. What was the process of acquiring the film like? Were you nervous about negotiating? Were there other contenders for the Canadian rights?

ST: The company only incorporated in April, and by May I was at Cannes. I didn’t know anyone and all I had to represent myself was the Evokative Manifesto printed on a postcard. I booked as many meetings as I possibly could on-site and I just had to deliver the Evokative pitch convincingly. Some meetings were disastrous, with the sales agent clearly looking at me as if I came from another planet. But others got the Evokative vision and found it very refreshing. UGC was one of those. There were no other distributors contending for Le Tueur and it was already programmed at Fantasia, so it was perfect.

The first buy is obviously the most difficult, you have nothing to show for yourself except your willingness to make it. Just a few months in, it is already much easier. The fact that a big distribution company like UGC trusted a new-comer with Le Tueur opened doors. I have many more contacts from the festivals I attended (TIFF, Pusan) and the films acquired. I also got some nice industry press in the last few months and the line-up I’ve created speaks for Evokative.

I’m not in the business of fighting with other distributors for the rights to a film. Starting up, I don’t have the funds to get into bidding wars. Also, the goal of Evokative is to bring films that otherwise wouldn’t get distribution in Canada.

Evok - Evokative Films

JM: I love Evok, your “mascot”. Can you tell us a bit about his story, who designed him and what your plans are for him in the future?

ST: I dealt with Upperkut, a marketing agency here in Montréal, for the development of the visual identity of Evokative. It was a long and arduous process, but I’m extremely happy of the result. I told them I wanted some kind of character and Antonin Brault, one of their creative directors, came up with Evok. He even made a real-life puppet for the pitch.

Evok brings a bit of comic relief in this very “serious” business of distribution. He also translates in a funny way the emotions that genre films bring about. He already has his own animation and we’ll see what we can have him do in the future.

JM: Tell me how you’re using the web as a small company.

ST: I very much believe in the future of the web for film promotion. It allows us to reach the audience directly, much more than with the mainstream media. I founded Evokative for international film fans, so I want them to get them involved and start a dialogue.

The last few months have been very exciting for me and I liked the idea of being able to share in the progress of the business, as well as giving as much information on the films as soon as they’re acquired, to help start the buzz and word-of-mouth. A blog-based website like I have now and Facebook are great platforms for that. A new website, developed by Philosophy Factory in Toronto, will soon be launched. We will also have a web store so that international film fans can have access to the Evokative DVDs from anywhere in Canada. Web-based distribution is also something I want to look into as soon as possible.

For me Evokative is much more than just another film distribution company. It’s about increasing the awareness and love of international genre films and also making a point that we are not prisoners of the mainstream film system, that one can go and stand up for the passion of a different genre of cinema. Of course I’ll need the company to become profitable to keep running, so hopefully film fans across Canada will respond to Evokative’s mission and will take it upon themselves to spread the good word!

{ 3 comments }

Of Time and the City

Of Time and the City (2008, Director: Terence Davies): Davies’ first film since 2000’s The House of Mirth, and his first documentary, Of Time and the City has been described as a love letter to his birthplace of Liverpool. Even though he hasn’t lived in the city for many years, he grew up here during the 50s and 60s, and it’s this now-vanished place that he remembers. Using his own voiceover makes the film extremely personal, and this particularity gives the film its emotional power. However, it can also make it hard for many people to connect with. Davies is a truly unique voice, and his love/hate relationship with Liverpool encompasses his lifelong struggle with his Catholicism and his homosexuality.

I’d love to say more, but unfortunately my screener was marred by a scratch that caused the film to stutter for about ten minutes right in the middle. This would definitely be worth a rewatch, preferably projected on a large screen.

Official site of the film
 Trailer

8/10(8/10)

{ 1 comment }

Flower in the Pocket

Flower in the Pocket (Director: Liew Seng Tat): Just before the screening, I overheard someone praising the Malaysian filmmakers’ ability to tell interesting stories on miniscule budgets and then when the film was introduced, it was revealed that this film was made for US$10,000-$15,000. After seeing this, I can concur with that judgement. In his directorial debut, director Liew Seng Tat weaves a remarkably rich and evocative portrait of an unusual family with an unexplained core of pain. When the film begins we meet Ma Li Ahn and Ma Li Ohm, two young Chinese-speaking brothers living in Kuala Lumpur. We observe their impish play and their difficulties at school, and how they depend on one another. When they do finally get home, the older boy, who appears to be about 9, makes three bowls of soup. The boys eat theirs, and leave the other bowl covered up as they head off to bed.

Later that night, their father Siu comes home. A single father, he works as a mannequin maker, and seems profoundly cut off from human contact, even contact with his own sons. Remarkably, father and sons aren’t even in the same frame for almost an hour. But the boys are resourceful and have each other. They seem to be happy. When they meet the tomboyish Ayu, she takes them home to meet her mother, who feeds them like the almost-feral creatures they resemble. It’s only at this point that the audience realizes how neglected the boys are.

Their father isn’t exactly uncaring, but he almost seems incapable of expressing love. Only later do we get a hint of the wound at the heart of the family, when Siu takes an old photo of a couple out of a shoebox, tears it in two, and tries to swallow the half with the woman’s picture. I assume this is the boys’ mother, but they never seem to ask for her. All this would seem unbearably sad except for the wonderfully impish performances of the brothers. As well, near the end, Siu seems to be making an effort to reconnect with the world, and most importantly, with his sons. There is also a good amount of humour in the film, some of it bordering on the zany.

I believe this may have been my first experience watching a film from Malaysia, and it was enlightening to observe just how multi-racial and multi-lingual a place like Kuala Lumpur is. With so many different cultures clashing, there is plenty of room for misunderstandings, many of which the director plays for laughs. But it’s also a place where people can fall through the cracks, and the scenes where the younger boy struggles in school because he can’t understand the Malay language point out that without family or friends, the modern multicultural city can be a scary place for children.

7/10(7/10)

{ 0 comments }