Hadewijch

by James McNally on September 12, 2009 · 8 comments

in Film Festivals,TIFF

Hadewijch

Hadewijch (Director: Bruno Dumont): In this, his fifth fea­ture film, Bruno Dumont has cre­ated some­thing as mys­ter­ious and beau­tiful as his prot­ag­onist. We meet young Celine in a con­vent, where she is hoping to take her vows as a nun. But her refusal to eat and other acts of self-denial worry the Mother Superior, who turns her out into the world, hoping to rid her of what she con­siders “self-love.” Though she lives with her wealthy par­ents in the centre of Paris, they’re dis­tant and there’s some sug­ges­tion of buried issues with her father.

One day she meets some boys in a café, who are amazed at her trusting nature. Yassine takes a spe­cial liking to her, although she rebuffs his romantic advances, claiming she only has love for Christ. The young Muslim is befuddled but still besotted, so he con­tinues their friend­ship. Eventually she visits the home he shares with his brother Nassir in the housing pro­jects out­side the city. Nassir is a “ser­ious” Muslim, according to Yassine, and he thinks they’ll hit it off. He has no idea.

Nassir recog­nizes the fire that burns in Celine’s heart, and though their reli­gions are dif­ferent, their pas­sion is the same. Over time, he con­vinces Celine that God is not only about love, but about justice as well. Soon after that, he takes her to Lebanon to show her the injustice he finds there. Dumont patiently lays the ground­work for a stun­ning climax that shows just how easily love can turn to violence.

Meanwhile, in a par­allel plot, we follow David, a petty crim­inal working in con­struc­tion at the con­vent. He breaks his parole and is sent back to jail for a few months. It’s not clear what his pur­pose is until the final scene, in which the two lives stand in stark con­trast to each other. Celine lives in extremes, reaching for holi­ness and finding tragedy. David is an everyman, flawed but more cap­able of love than Celine could ever be. The inter­sec­tion of their lives leads to a power­fully moving ending.

Dumont put his faith in non-professional Julie Sokolowski to play Celine, and the decision pays off. She por­trays her dis­con­nec­tion from the world nat­ur­ally, even as she radi­ates a for­bidden sexu­ality. Her purity attracts men, but she only has eyes for Christ, and her obses­sion verges on the sexual. Her prayers are painful, expressing her yearning to be with Christ even as she protests his absence. She longs for the ecstasy and obli­vion of union with God, and the con­nec­tion with some of the rhet­oric of Islamic ter­rorism couldn’t be more clear.

This is the first of Dumont’s films I’ve seen, and I’m cap­tiv­ated by his intel­li­gence and will­ing­ness to explore such interior issues as reli­gious faith and obses­sion. In the post-screening Q&A, he revealed that Hadewijch was a real mystic from the Middle Ages, and his explor­a­tion of what a modern example would look like in a world filled with polit­ical action makes for one smart and haunting film.

Official site of the film (en francais)

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Bruno Dumont from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 27:10

9/10(9/10)

{ 8 comments }

1 Rob September 13, 2009 at 6:10 pm

Many thanks for your sensitive and informative review, and for providing the Q&A audio.

Could the film’s depiction of Islamic piety have anything to do with its not having been selected for this year’s Cannes?

2 James McNally September 13, 2009 at 7:49 pm

Thank you for your comment, Rob. I was speaking with a (non-religious) Muslim friend today and he found the film offensive. I argued that I thought Dumont was trying to show that any religious fervor can be turned to violent ends, but he thought that the Muslim characters had been “used”. Interesting discussion.

3 Remy September 13, 2009 at 8:55 pm

Thanks a lot for providing the Q&A audio. Can you say what was the general feeling about the film after the screening? Did people only think about its religious meaning?

4 James McNally September 13, 2009 at 9:39 pm

Difficult to say, Remy. I think someone in the Q&A made a comment that they thought she was suffering from a mental illness, but some people say that about almost anyone who doesn’t subscribe to a completely materialistic world view these days. I wish there had been comments about the Muslim issue. I expect there will be in the French press!

5 khatar September 14, 2009 at 6:31 pm

I have to say that Dumont wasnt interested to think about the islam. The muslims were treated like the Others, from an external point of view. Maybe he should have gone deeply in the matter but he didnt. This reveals to us the general status of the islam in our world. The character of Nassir wasnt a simple terrorist alquaida style. He was also an intellectual engaged in politic. We can notice that the war in his country is related to his will of putting the bomb. dont you think?

6 Barry September 21, 2009 at 12:06 pm

An insightful review of a compelling and powerful film. Your 9/10 rating is apropos. One could hear a pin drop at the repeat TIFF screening at the Winter Garden on Saturday. HADEWIJCH is one of those films that resonates days later. Beautifully-made, haunting indeed, a truly thought provoking experience in many ways. Controversial? Yes. That’s what makes for powerful cinema.

7 khatar September 21, 2009 at 12:41 pm

I have to say that Lebanon is not the country in the story because in lebanon we find only red cross.

8 Rob September 22, 2009 at 5:12 pm

I wonder if the walk-outs at San Sebastian were prompted by the issue under discussion here:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hIs2XSG9FsEI0hupwPpZOf0ghetQ

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: