Le Sentiment de la Chair (The Sentiment of the Flesh)

by James McNally on September 2, 2010

in Film Festivals

Le Sentiment de la Chair (The Sentiment of the Flesh)

Le Sentiment de la Chair (The Sentiment of the Flesh) (Director: Roberto Garzelli): When Helena, a young med­ical illus­trator, begins exper­i­en­cing lower back pain, she goes for x-rays, bringing her into con­tact with Benoit, a radi­olo­gist. A series of cir­cum­stances brings them together again and again and soon they are involved in a pas­sionate love affair. Each of them is drawn to obsess­ively doc­u­ment the human body, both inside and out, and in order to break down all bar­riers to intimacy, they go to extreme lengths to explore each other’s bodies. Robert Garzelli’s fea­ture debut has the germ of a fas­cin­ating idea at its heart, but in the end is as shallow, albeit beau­tiful, as its protagonists.

When Helena tells Benoit that it is a priv­ilege for him to be able to see inside people, she’s right. But in equating that with intimacy, both she and Benoit are ludicrously mis­guided. If the film seemed more aware of that irony, it could have been a fas­cin­ating explor­a­tion of a romantic rela­tion­ship. When she asks Benoit to scan her com­pletely in an MRI machine, saying “I don’t want to have any secrets from you,” I almost laughed out loud, for all that we’ve seen from this extremely attractive couple up to that point has been an intense sexual rela­tion­ship. Neither seems to know or care any­thing about the other’s family, circle of friends, dreams or aspirations.

The fact that Benoit can pos­sess a full set of images of his lover’s body gives him no insight into her char­acter. It’s simply x-ray porn. The lovers’ belief that they can know each other by knowing each other’s bodies is naive, at first charm­ingly, and then dis­turb­ingly so. If it was only that easy to see what was inside the other’s mind, heart, or soul.

In the end, the film goes for the psy­cho­lo­gical angle, and almost becomes a thriller, as we see these two obsess over, and then reject each other as they try to quell the growing intensity of their shared fetish. The final scene is meant to dis­turb, and it does, to a point. It prompted a few walkouts from the audi­ence at my screening, but failed to gen­erate any emo­tional reac­tion from me. The dir­ector seems to keep his dis­tance, giving the film a cold, hard, dare I say clin­ical edge. Unfortunately, if there was any beating heart in this film, the x-rays failed to find it.

7/10(7/10)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: