From the daily archives:

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Editor’s Note: David Thomas is a friend of mine from many years of SXSW, but he’s also an astute observer of the film world, and since he’s a Philadelphia res­ident, I asked him to report on this year’s edi­tion of the Philadelphia Film Festival, which ran from April 5th-18th. Please for­give his gauche American (mis)spellings.

Philadelphia Film Festival

Here’s a run­down of my itin­erary at this year’s Philadelphia Film Festival. Seventeen movies in four­teen days. Good thing I live here.

We start with a film that defies cat­egor­iz­a­tion, Lionel Bailliu’s Fair Play. This part thriller, part comedy, mostly cor­porate soap opera plays out (maybe a little too much) the jux­ta­pos­i­tion of cor­porate and ath­letic com­pet­i­tion. Worth checking out for the unbe­liev­ably tense twenty-minute squash sequence alone.

A couple of for­eign crime dramas made the rounds. Uro, by the Norwegian dir­ector Stefan Faldbakkenn, is a Michael Mannish take on the drug trade in Oslo, with a good deal of family drama thrown in. As under­cover cop stories go, it’s no Narc or Deep Cover, but it’ll do in a pinch. Triad Election, on the other hand, approaches Godfather–level status at times. Though it screened without its pre­de­cessor, Election, I was still able to follow the action, which dir­ector Johnny To films with gor­geous dark­ness. Basically another take on the “but I don’t wanna be a gang­ster” genre, but executed beautifully.

I only checked out a couple of dramas and had very dif­ferent reac­tions. Red Road is being hailed from here to its native Glasgow as the best thing since the inven­tion of Dogme, but I was unim­pressed. It’s one of those films where I can appre­ciate the out­standing dir­ec­tion, acting and even the power of the story, but still find it boring as watching video render. Everybody else loved it, though, so you may still want to check it out.

Day Night Day Night on the other hand, achieves more with even less. But it’s con­text that makes all the dif­fer­ence. The film begins with a woman arriving at an air­port, going to a hotel and taking a bath, clip­ping her nails, etc. This is, like, the first twenty minutes of the film. Should be deadly dull. But you know going in if you know any­thing about the film that this woman is about to commit a hor­rible ter­rorist act. Suddenly everything takes on a greater sig­ni­fic­ance, whether it really should or not. Director Julia Loktev con­tinues to film her prot­ag­onist with a Jarmusch-like focus on the minu­tiae, even as her lit­eral dead­line nears. It makes for some of the most grip­ping, dis­turbing cinema pre­cisely because it’s depol­it­i­cized (we never learn her name, much less who she’s working for or why).

The Danger After Dark pro­gram was as strong as ever this year. Though not tech­nic­ally part of the pro­gram, The Kovak Box would have fit right in, with its mind con­trol, sui­cides and Stephen King-esque prot­ag­onist. It’s dark fun, if a little silly at times. The same could be argued for End of the Line which asks the ques­tion what if a bunch of fan­at­ical Christians all snapped at once and started killing people in order to “save” them from the Apocalypse, and what if you were trapped on the subway with a bunch of them when it happened? This Canadian flick wrings a lot more ten­sion from that premise than you might think, espe­cially in its closing seconds.

Operating at another level is Dead Daughters, from Russian helmer Pavel Ruminov. A visual feast with the best use of surround-sound in a horror film I’ve ever heard. Mood and atmo­sphere, not blood-and-guts. Severance, on the other hand, is the fun­niest horror movie since Scream — maybe fun­nier. Basically The Office thrown into a slasher flick, it’s the most fun I had at any movie of the fest.

The most unlikely source for comedy this year was Lars Von Trier whose The Boss of It All skewers cor­porate cul­ture, actors and Icelanders with equal glee. Eagle Vs. Shark takes the quirky, affect­less comedy of Napoleon Dynamite and sets in in New Zealand and Samoa with a little more depth. The Ten takes on as many com­mand­ments with mixed results.

Waitress, by the dearly departed Adrienne Shelly, shows how adept she was as an act­ress, writer and dir­ector telling the story of the eponymous character’s trav­ails trying to leave her over­bearing hus­band by whom she has just become preg­nant. Firefly and Felicity fans take note, Nathan Fillion and Keri Russell are out­standing in this, though Curb Your Enthusiasm fans have the most to enthuse about as Cheryl Hines gives a near Best Supporting Actress worthy per­form­ance as a fellow waitress.

My favorite comedy of the fest, though, was Rocket Science from Spellbound dir­ector Jeffrey Blitz, who’s as adept with nar­rative fic­tion as doc­u­mentary. The film fol­lows the trav­ails of a young stut­terer con­vinced to join his school’s debate team. It’s based on Blitz’s own dis­fluent child­hood and aches with all the tur­moil of bitter youth. And it’s funny.

Finally we come to the docs which were a myriad bunch. The Killer Within enthralls with its tale of a seem­ingly normal psy­cho­logy pro­fessor who con­fesses to mur­dering a dorm mate in col­lege. The reac­tions to and implic­a­tions of his crime and sub­sequent release res­onate throughout and provide plenty of dis­cus­sion fodder.

VHS Kaloucha pro­files a pas­sionate (the man lit­er­ally bleeds for his shots) Tunisian dir­ector who cranks out genre films on VHS with no budget as he makes his latest opus Tarzan of the Arabs. A must for film geeks and anyone inter­ested in Tunisia.

Finally, In the Shadow of the Moon takes a seem­ingly worn out topic, the moon landing, and finds fresh life that not only illu­min­ates a tur­bu­lent time in his­tory but sheds light on a number of cur­rent crises. The archival footage dir­ector David Sington inter­cuts with the sur­viving astro­nauts, who provide the film’s only nar­ra­tion, is still powerful today.

Most of these films will be get­ting their release in the months to come, so keep your eyes peeled.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Agnes Varnum

Agnes Varnum is a well-known blogger in the doc­u­mentary film­making com­munity, and she wears many hats at once. In addi­tion to working in pub­li­city for First Run/Icarus Films, she also does doc­u­mentary pro­gram­ming for sev­eral film fest­ivals and writes a reg­ular column for Indiewire. I caught up with the multi-talented Ms. Varnum at this year’s Hot Docs.

James McNally: Tell me about how and why you decided to start your blog.

Agnes Varnum: After SXSW last year, it became clear to me how emer­ging web tech­no­lo­gies, in short­hand, Web 2.0, was bringing people together. Not so much in the film world but def­in­itely in the inter­active com­munity. I wanted to see if it would work in my world — could I raise my own pro­file? Find or create com­munity? Practice my writing skills. It’s been much more suc­cessful and enriching than I had imagined.

JM: In light of the fact that the US is embroiled in a war, and that the level of polit­ical dis­course in the country seems to be at an all-time low, what are some of the themes you’re finding in the doc­u­ment­aries you’re watching? Do you think doc­u­ment­arians have a respons­b­ility to try to engage people in polit­ical reflec­tion? And if so, do you see any pos­itive result of any par­tic­ular films?

AV: This seems to be the age-old ques­tion of “Do docs make a dif­fer­ence?”, and I won’t pre­sume to have an answer beyond my own exper­i­ence. The films I watch, I think, inform me, sens­itize me, move me emo­tion­ally, make me think and engage others. I’m sure that I’m a better cit­izen and person than if I never got into this line of work, but no one is meas­uring how much I’ve changed as a result of the films I’ve watched. One of the things that keeps me in this busi­ness is being around like-minded people, and being present when viewer’s minds are opened. All we can do is keep on our paths and hope that the num­bers of people willing to change their own lives for the bet­ter­ment of others will keep growing.

The cur­rent state of US for­eign policy seems to be a pre­valent theme, and is being addressed in a number of “soldier’s exper­i­ence” films — Operation Homecoming, The War Tapes, and there are sev­eral in the Tribeca programme.

JM: You do mar­keting and pub­li­city for First Run/Icarus Films as well as write columns for a few out­lets and pro­gram for film fest­ivals. Can you tell us a little bit about some of the work you’re involved with right now? Anything inter­esting coming up that you’d like to talk about?

AV: Well, you’ve nailed my bio in a nut­shell. I also do some nar­rative fea­ture devel­op­ment. One pro­ject that I worked on may go into pro­duc­tion this year, so I’m crossing my fin­gers, but I can’t say much more than that about it.

JM: How do you feel the internet and blogs in par­tic­ular have helped inde­pendent and doc­u­mentary filmmakers?

AV: For the people who take advantage of the pos­sib­il­ities, still very few in number, I think it can open up whole new doors to get­ting your work seen and bought. 51 Birch Street is a great example — Doug [Block] did well on the fest cir­cuit but he par­layed that and his online efforts into a very suc­cessful the­at­rical run for his film. Lance Weiler (Head Trauma) is also a master in self-distribution. He did all his own book­ings, but it was his ability to mobilize people out to the theatres that made it work. Four-Eyed Monsters is an early example of this as well.

Blogs are a filter. Those of us doing it write about what we see, enjoy, hate, and our readers may make choices depending on that. I do think that blogs tend to be a niche filter — why read my review if you can read [New York Times film critic] Manohla Dargis? I try to not waste my time on material that is covered else­where, but I see the trend that as a blog becomes more pop­ular, they also tend to go more main­stream. It’s still evolving.

JM: What per­centage of your time does your blog take up and does it match the per­centage of your income you derive from it?

AV: I put in much more time than I get paid for dir­ectly. I have not been suc­cessful in mon­et­izing my blog, but that is a choice. If you want to make money blog­ging, don’t write about niche topics. The people raking in the cash are writing about blog­ging and tech­no­logy (take a look at Technorati’s Top 100). But, the work has other dividends for me that are more important.

JM: After Hot Docs, of course, what do you con­sider the best doc­u­mentary film fest­ivals in the world?

AV: This ques­tion comes up a lot and “best” is totally sub­jective. It always depends on what you need from it and whether the fest meets your needs, and I have not been to all the fest­ivals. But, of the fests I’ve been to, IDFA is an amazing exper­i­ence; SILVERDOCS, Hot Docs and SXSW (not only docs, but truly inspiring on so many levels) are right up there.

JM: Are there any undis­covered gems at this fest­ival that you’d like to let our readers know about?

AV: Can’t answer this until I’ve dis­covered them! I’m really looking for­ward to seeing My Second Life though!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }