Thursday, April 26, 2007

¿¡Revolución!?

¿¡Revolución!? (Director: Charles Gervais, Canada, 2007): A few years ago, I saw a doc­u­mentary about Venezuelan pres­ident Hugo Chavez called The Revolution Will Not Be Televised. The film­makers actu­ally cap­tured the events of a 48-hour-long coup in 2002, and I was riv­eted by the film and by the story of this small but oil-rich nation. Now Canadian dir­ector Charles Gervais has provided an update on how Chavez’s revolu­tion is chan­ging Venezuela.

In the earlier film, the oppos­i­tion to Chavez seemed more organ­ized and the situ­ation on the ground more volatile. In the years since, there has been no fur­ther viol­ence, the press has remained essen­tially free, and poor Venezuelans con­tinue to benefit from gen­erous pro­grammes which have greatly improved health care and education.

The problem is that Chavez has con­tinued to pick fights with the United States. He has blamed them for the 2002 coup and has hinted darkly that the U.S. is pre­paring a mil­itary inva­sion of his country to seize its oil reserves. In his efforts to break his country away from an unbal­anced trade rela­tion­ship, he has aligned him­self with every anti-American gov­ern­ment in the world, which seems pat­ently unwise. But Chavez is a pas­sionate man, and one gets the impres­sion that he doesn’t often think too far ahead. His recent alli­ance with Iran’s smiling but hard­line pres­ident Ahmadinejad seems espe­cially dangerous.

Meanwhile, people on the streets seem to sup­port him, with the caveat that no one wants to see him in power for 40 years like Castro. The opposition’s main jibe is that Chavez is importing his ideas from Cuba and exporting them all over Latin America. It is true that there has been a marked left­ward swing in most of Latin America’s gov­ern­ments lately, and a few (Ecuador, Bolivia) have openly emu­lated Chavez’s plat­form. This is what irks the Americans the most, that they can no longer have the unfettered polit­ical influ­ence in Latin America that they once had.

Gervais’ film uses an incident from 2005 as a philo­soph­ical starting point. In that year, Chavez gave away one mil­lion copies of Cervantes’ book Don Quixote, citing Quixote as the ulti­mate dreamer and man of action, a true revolu­tionary. Using bril­liant anim­a­tions and voi­ceover, the film uses Quixote to out­line a ten-point plan for revolu­tion, and then meas­ures Venezuela’s pro­gress. The last point is instructive: Becoming Expendable. It is here where are left at the end of the film. Chavez has done many great things for his country. But his per­son­ality cult is unset­tling, and even some of his sup­porters seem wor­ried that he’ll attempt to hang onto his power too long. It’s important to remember that Quixote was also seen as a fool by many people, and that some of his efforts caused more harm than good. Many revolu­tionary move­ments have stalled at this point, and it remains to be seen whether Venezuela can main­tain its many suc­cesses without Chavez.

I approach Venezuela and Chavez from the same per­spective as Gervais, as a hopeful sym­path­izer. His aims and achieve­ments have been com­mend­able; the man him­self is a puzzle. The film seems to get the bal­ance right, while com­mu­nic­ating the pas­sion and sur­prising polit­ical acumen of Venezuelan cit­izens from right across the socio-economic spec­trum. Lively music and innov­ative use of anim­a­tion and voi­ceover made this extremely pol­ished film even more captivating.

Seville Pictures is dis­trib­uting the film and it will receive a the­at­rical release on May 25th in Toronto (at the Royal Cinema). Watch for it.

UPDATE: I’ve now posted my own inter­view with dir­ector Charles Gervais when we spoke during Hot Docs.

Official site for the film

Q&A with dir­ector Charles Gervais from the Hot Docs site

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }