russia

Thieves By Law

Thieves By Law (Director: Alexander Gentelev): I’ve been reading Misha Glenny’s excel­lent survey of the world of organ­ized crime, McMafia: A Journey Through the Global Underworld, so the sub­ject of this film inter­ested me. An exposé of the inner work­ings of the Russian “mafia” as told by three allegedly “former” gang­sters, Thieves By Law wasn’t quite as shocking as it might be to someone com­pletely unfa­miliar with this world, but the level of access gained by dir­ector Gentelev is impressive.

We’re first intro­duced to Leonid “Macintosh” Bilunov, living in a man­sion in the south of France. He’s cul­tured and rather charming, even as he recounts his own violent prison stories. Alimzhan Tokhtakhounov, nick­named Taiwanchik (“the Taiwanese”) is an Uzbek who was charged in the scandal sur­rounding the 2002 Olympic figure skating com­pet­i­tion. It was Tokhtakhounov who was alleged to have bribed the French judge to score the Russian skaters higher than the Canadians. Most fear­some of all is Vitaly Dyemochka (“Bondar”), a cold-eyed gang leader who has spent nearly half his life in prison. Despite their will­ing­ness to talk, one gets the dis­tinct impres­sion that they have done many more bad things than they’ll admit to.

What they do reveal is just how quickly the under­world rose to power as the Soviet state appar­atus was col­lapsing in the late 1980s. The vacuum in polit­ical and eco­nomic power was quickly filled by the crim­inal gangs, who had never played by Soviet rules. Instead, their “Thieves’ Code” had flour­ished since Stalin’s time, allowing them to vir­tu­ally con­trol the prisons in which they were held. In the lean Soviet years, this code seemed almost ascetic. No wives or chil­dren allowed, no registered addresses, no working within society, no betraying other crim­inals. When these gangs were turned loose upon a newly “free” Russia, though, their code quickly broke down. Each group began run­ning extor­tion and pro­tec­tion rackets, tar­geting the thou­sands of new busi­nesses that sprung up overnight. Many of Russia’s richest men suc­ceeded by grabbing state assets cheaply, and the gangs latched on like para­sites. This is where the concept of the krisha (“roof”) was estab­lished. A crim­inal organ­iz­a­tion would “offer” their ser­vices as a krisha to pro­tect the busi­ness from other crim­inals (and often the police) for a price. The police at this time became just as cor­rupt, with the addi­tional power that went with the threat of legal action against the businesses.

The long rot of the Soviet state meant that in the public’s eyes, crim­inals had a better repu­ta­tion than the police anyway, so it wasn’t dif­fi­cult for the crim­inal gangs to operate and recruit. While the Thieves’ Code was in effect, gangs would often meet up to arbit­rate dis­putes in an almost gen­tle­manly fashion, but from 1994–2000, a brutal civil war took place among the gangs, who were each fighting for supremacy. This feeding frenzy essen­tially left the Code in tat­ters, as greed took over.

As the gangs them­selves grew richer and more business-savvy, they wanted to get into busi­ness them­selves, so they often demanded part­ner­ships with the busi­nessmen they were pre­vi­ously extorting. In this way, our prot­ag­on­ists ostens­ibly went legit, although there were never really any clean hands in the Russian busi­ness world. They also needed places to launder their new­found wealth, so many took advantage of Israel’s gen­erous immig­ra­tion policies and lack of fin­an­cial reg­u­la­tions. If a gang­ster wasn’t Jewish, he would simply marry a Jewish woman in order to gain an Israeli pass­port. In this period, the gangs stopped killing each other and started killing more busi­nessmen, in order to take over their enter­prises. With crim­inal organ­iz­a­tions now in con­trol of many legal busi­nesses in Russia (among them con­struc­tion, banking and real estate), it’s dif­fi­cult to tell the good guys from the bad. And glob­al­iz­a­tion has allowed these guys to extend their reach right around the world, which Glenny’s book recounts in agon­izing detail.

Although Thieves By Law is tre­mend­ously inform­ative, and the char­ac­ters are suit­ably chilling, it’s shot very much in a tele­vi­sion doc­u­mentary style. It packs a lot of inform­a­tion into its run­ning time, but it’s not par­tic­u­larly filmic. In an ironic twist, the cold-eyed Vitaly now spends his time writing and dir­ecting gang­ster films in Russia. He admon­ishes his actors by telling them, “this isn’t just a story, this really happened!” Maybe Gentelev should have brought him aboard to film some “re-enactments.”

7/10(7/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Cowboys in Kosovo (Netherlands, Director: Corinne van Egeraat) — The director’s Albanian friend from Kosovo had fled to Amsterdam when the war broke out, but his brothers and cousins stayed, and now, years later, she returns with him to act out their child­hood dream: to play cow­boys in a movie. Kosovo’s land­scape is remark­ably sim­ilar to that seen in a lot of old Westerns, and once the brothers don their chaps and ten-gallon hats, it’s pure play as they re-enact scenes from their favourite Westerns, such as The Magnificent Seven and Shane. Interspersed are their recol­lec­tions about the war and how toy guns and real guns are very dif­ferent. (8/10)

Putin’s Mama (Netherlands, Director: Ineke Smits) — Vera is an incred­ibly sharp 77-year old who’s con­vinced that the son she sent to live with her par­ents at age 10 has grown up to become Russia’s pres­ident. She is so heart­felt in her wish for him to come and visit, and her story seems so plaus­ible, that by the end, I was con­vinced. So rather than this being a story about a pos­sible crackpot, it became for me a fas­cin­ating char­acter study of a strong Russian woman who mar­ried a Georgian and “became a peasant.” The vil­lage life is richly por­trayed and I found myself won­dering along with Vera why Vladimir doesn’t come to visit his mama in this col­ourful place. (9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }