photography

Shadow Play: The Making of Anton Corbijn

Shadow Play: The Making of Anton Corbijn (Director: Josh Whiteman): “Having your pic­ture taken is like intimacy, it’s like having sex…I’ve been having sex with Anton for nearly 20 years now, since I was a boy.”

That pro­voc­ative line comes cour­tesy of Bono, who has worked with famed Dutch visu­alist Anton Corbijn numerous times over the years and is fea­tured prom­in­ently in Shadow Play: The Making Of Anton Corbijn. Aside from providing some voi­ceovers, the U2 vocalist also gives sev­eral inter­views and is fea­tured in a clever riff on Bob Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” video. The doc­u­mentary flips the camera around 180 degrees to present a por­trait of the photographer/film director/music video dir­ector and his work, motiv­a­tion, inspir­a­tion, and back­ground. Director Josh Whiteman has assembled an impressive roster of celebrities to sing Corbijn’s praises — along with Bono, we also get testi­mo­nials from Michael Stipe, Kurt Cobain, Dave Gahan (Depeche Mode), Brandon Flowers (The Killers), Chris Martin (Coldplay), writer William Gibson, act­ress Samantha Morton, and model Helena Christensen. These names rep­resent only a frac­tion of the talent Corbijn has col­lab­or­ated with over his career, though. Others include Bruce Springsteen, David Bowie, Johnny Cash, Tom Waits, Miles Davis, Metallica, Stephen Hawking, Robert De Niro, and The Rolling Stones.

Much of the acclaim in Shadow Play from Corbijn’s sub­jects centres on his ability to “go to that dark area that most other lensers can’t reach”, or that “he truly cap­tures one’s soul” with his work, to para­phrase their words. Such plat­it­udes get repet­itive and over­stated if, like me, you feel Corbijn’s still pho­to­graphy work is highly over­rated. I’ve seen more than enough of it over the years, espe­cially as a devout U2 fan, and the accol­ades and crit­ical rein­force­ment he receives have always eluded me. The common cri­ti­cism, with which I concur, is a propensity for dark, murky shots that suc­ceed in ali­en­ating the viewer as much as cap­tiv­ating them. Flowers talks about this very issue, in an inter­esting anec­dote about his record company’s reluct­ance to have Corbijn work with the band. Stipe men­tions the fact that Metallica employed Corbijn to assist in their image rebranding after a lengthy hiatus (in 1996 to shoot the CD and pro­mo­tional photos for their Load album). What Stipe fails to men­tion is that the rebranding was not received well at all by the media and, espe­cially, by their fans.

Corbijn’s work, expec­tedly, gets the bulk of the screen time in Shadow Play; what Whiteman fails to uncover, how­ever, are the layers to him that exist out­side of that work. Several inter­views with him reveal little about his upbringing and make vir­tu­ally no men­tion of his private life. Corbijn isn’t exactly a dynamic inter­view sub­ject, either. Whiteman also errs in spending so much time focusing on Corbijn’s fea­ture film debut Control (review), a biopic of Joy Division singer Ian Curtis. Control dis­tract­ingly becomes a run­ning nar­rative throughout Shadow Play, with seem­ingly little rhyme or reason as to why we’re get­ting yet another look at an inter­view with the cast, behind-the-scenes footage, or cov­erage of the Cannes film fest­ival premiere, none of which would even stand out as note­worthy DVD extras.

If Corbijn’s sup­posed stock-in-trade is visu­ally get­ting to the soul of his sub­jects then this film, iron­ic­ally, fails to do just that.

Official site of the film

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The True Meaning of Pictures: Shelby Lee Adams' Appalachia

The True Meaning of Pictures: Shelby Lee Adams’ Appalachia (2002, Director: Jennifer Baichwal): In 2002, Jennifer Baichwal dir­ected this fab­ulous film about Shelby Lee Adams’ con­tro­ver­sial photos of the poor people in the Appalachian Mountains.

Adams was born in Kentucky and has spent 30 years doc­u­menting and pho­to­graphing the poor fam­ilies in the various hollers of Appalachia. He’s become very good friends with some of these fam­ilies and has com­pletely gained their trust.

Most of us would look at Adams’ photos and describe the people in them as hill­bil­lies or “banjo people”, straight out of the film Deliverance. Is he trying to exploit them or is he merely doc­u­menting their way of life?

The sub­jects in Adams’ photos feel that his work is harm­less and a true rep­res­ent­a­tion of their cul­ture. As a viewer, you get the sense that Adams truly feels he is doc­u­menting the Appalachian way of life. Several art critics fea­tured in the film feel oth­er­wise. Adams stages some of his photos and uses the­at­rical lighting to great effect. His work is incred­ibly beau­tiful, com­plex, and more fine art than doc­u­mentary photography.

He’s exhib­ited his photos around the world, sold prints and pub­lished many books about the Appalachian people. He’s become very suc­cessful and made a good living by being a pho­to­grapher. Baichwal doesn’t make any judge­ments in the film. But at a Q&A after­ward, she ques­tioned how people at a Berlin gal­lery of Adams’ work would read his pho­to­graphs while sip­ping cham­pagne and eating smoked salmon. They’re prob­ably going to see the ste­reo­type instead of the friendly people that Adams has gotten to know over the years.

I haven’t men­tioned the slaughter of a hog, the prac­tice of snake hand­ling, pipe smoking gran­nies, inbreeding and the high mor­tality rate up in the Appalachian hills. For that, you’ll have to watch the film and it’s a good one.

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Daddy Tran: A Life in 3-D

Daddy Tran: A Life in 3-D (2008, Director: Sia Tu): At first glance, this appears to be a film about an artist who has a pas­sion for 3-D pho­to­graphy. Unfortunately this film is more about Hai “Daddy” Tran’s lifelong obses­sion with pho­to­graphy and its impact on his family.

Tran is an inter­esting sub­ject for a film. He’s cha­ris­matic, pas­sionate about pho­to­graphy and he runs a vin­tage camera store in an industry that is dom­in­ated by digital cam­eras. He loves to col­lect things and not just a few — thou­sands of cam­eras and lenses, jew­elry, lights, lawn orna­ments. Every door inside his house has mul­tiple locks. It takes four keys just to get inside his house!

I found Hai Tran to be more a lov­able eccentric than a true artist or pho­to­grapher. I was hoping this film would be a little more along the lines of What Remains (2005) or Manufactured Landscapes (2006). Tran appears to be more of a hol­iday snapper than a pho­to­grapher. I guess this is why the film focuses more on his obses­sions and char­acter rather than his photography.

Daddy Tran: A Life in 3-D is an average doc­u­mentary film for me. The pro­duc­tion values could have been stronger and I found that the same photos were being used repeatedly in dif­ferent parts of the film.

I might have enjoyed the film a little more if:

  • the pro­jec­tionist didn’t stop the film 3 minutes in because it was being shown in the wrong aspect ratio
  • the film didn’t stop 10 minutes later because it was missing the subtitles
  • dir­ector Siu Ta brought the cor­rect ver­sion of the film and checked it before the screening

Siu Ta wanted to cancel the screening and res­chedule it for a later date! Thankfully an audi­ence member per­suaded her to just show the film. She used a micro­phone and trans­lated parts of the film while it played.

Watching this film was prob­ably the most unique exper­i­ence I’ve had at Hot Docs. What made all of these glitches ironic was that it screened with Behind the Glass (review) — a film about pro­jec­tion­ists and their import­ance in the present­a­tion of a film.

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }