palestine

Waltz with Bashir

Waltz with Bashir (2008, Director: Ari Folman): I think calling this an anim­ated doc­u­mentary might be stretching it a bit, but dir­ector Ari Folman has cre­ated some­thing really inter­esting. He’s used anim­a­tion to go where doc­u­mentary film­making hasn’t been able to take us before, into the memories, dreams and night­mares of its sub­jects. The film starts when Ari (looking uncan­nily like Italian film diarist Nanni Morretti) shares a drink with an old army buddy who describes his recur­ring night­mare of being chased by 28 dogs. After finding out that this relates to spe­cific incid­ents from the 1982 Lebanon war, we dis­cover that Ari Folman has little recol­lec­tion of his par­ti­cip­a­tion in that con­flict. But after this meeting, he begins having a strange recur­ring dream and after con­sulting a psy­cho­lo­gist friend, he decides he needs to try to figure out why his memory seems blocked.

As he inter­views other par­ti­cipants in the war, he begins to piece together his part in a larger nar­rative, that of Israeli com­pli­ance in the mas­sacre of thou­sands of Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut. “Christian” Phalangist mili­tias entered the camps and mas­sacred men, women and chil­dren for three hor­rific days, killing more than 3,000. Despite the mili­tias’ stated aim of rooting out Palestinian fighters, the vast majority of these fighters had been evac­u­ated weeks before. The blood­bath was widely seen as revenge for the assas­sin­a­tion of the Phalangists’ leader, the recently-elected President Bashir Gemayel. Although Folman’s memory is never com­pletely reli­able, he seems to remember his army unit firing flares so that the mili­tias could carry out their work at night.

The most shocking moment of the film comes right at the end, when the anim­a­tion sud­denly snaps into real-life video footage of the carnage, leaving a dra­matic impres­sion. Despite the unre­li­ab­ility of memory, and the nature of guilt (both sur­vivor guilt and that of someone who killed other human beings) and its effect on the mind, this footage is evid­ence of a real atro­city, and Folman and his com­rades have had to live with their part in this tragedy for more than twenty years. It’s no wonder that he used anim­a­tion; it’s the per­fect way to recreate nightmares.

Unfortunately, the dir­ector flew home after the film’s opening screening and wasn’t present for a Q&A.

Official site of the film
Trailer

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Danish Poet
The Danish Poet

Tonight’s pro­gramme con­sisted of award-winning shorts released in 2006, and just watching them one after another led me to a few con­clu­sions about short films in gen­eral. To com­pare them to written works, they’re a bit like poems to a fea­ture film’s novel. And to com­pare to spoken word, they’re like jokes as opposed to sagas. With such a short amount of time, they need to make their points quickly, so there is often a high “clev­erness” factor and the end­ings often feel like the punch line of a joke. This can work well, but a film that stands out is one that doesn’t make these tropes so obvious. Here, in my order of enjoy­ment, are tonight’s selections:

  • The Danish Poet (Canada/Norway, 2006): With lovely nar­ra­tion from Liv Ullmann, this story felt the most organic and the least gim­micky. Even though there is a sort of punch­line “payoff” at the end, it’s tele­graphed early enough to set us down gently. The whim­sical anim­a­tion style and always-great use of anim­ated (but non-speaking) animals made this a worthy Oscar-winner this year. Check out the film’s web site. (9/10)
  • Dreams and Desires — Family Ties (UK, 2006): Another anim­ated short, this one clev­erly used anim­ated sketches to sim­u­late a wed­ding video filmed by the oddly cinephilic Beryl, a large woman of grand­moth­erly vin­tage. Her attempts to film the dis­astrous occa­sion in the styles of famous dir­ectors from Eistenstein to Riefenstahl, all the while keeping up a steady stream-of-consciousness nar­ra­tion, keeps this one rol­licking along, des­pite the nearly impen­et­rable accents. (9/10)
  • Tanghi Argentini (Belgium, 2006): This is a charming tale of an office drone who just might be an angel. André needs to learn to tango in two weeks so he can meet his Internet crush, so he turns to his col­league Frans to help teach him to dance. Will love bloom? (8/10)
  • Contact (Raak) (Netherlands, 2006): Three char­ac­ters paths cross again and again in this cleverly-edited short. There’s that word “clever” again. (7/10)
  • The Substitute (Il Supplente) (Italy, 2006): A class of high-school stu­dents is ter­ror­ized by a Scott Thompson (ex-Kids in the Hall) lookalike, who then gets his comeup­pance. Funny in an odd sort of way. (7/10)
  • Make A Wish (Atmenah) (USA, 2006): A straight­for­ward, almost documentary-like tale of a young girl who will go to any lengths to get a spe­cial birthday cake. Only it’s set in the West Bank. The film­making is pretty rudi­mentary and there’s a bit of a (tragic) punch­line at the end. (6/10)
  • Imagine This (Australia/Ireland, 2006): Sometimes a short should also be a “small.” Using found internet footage to make George W. Bush “sing” John Lennon’s “Imagine” was a pretty funny idea. But it really shouldn’t have made it off the YouTube site. (5/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Raised To Be Heroes

Raised To Be Heroes (Canada, 2005, Director: Jack Silberman, 53 minutes): A por­trait of sev­eral “refuseniks,” Israeli sol­diers who refuse to serve in the Occupied Territories, this film revealed a side of Israeli society that we rarely get to see on the nightly news. Not exactly paci­fists, these men simply think that their role in the Israeli Defence Forces is to defend Israel, and that what they’re being asked to do has nothing to do with that role. In fact, many of them say they are being asked to commit war crimes against civil­ians on a reg­ular basis, and so they have decided to face the con­sequences of dis­obeying their orders. For many of them, it involves long stretches in mil­itary prisons, but as one reserve officer said, he felt his 21 days in mil­itary prison did more to serve his country than all his years of obeying his superiors.

The film skil­fully weaved bits of Israel’s his­tory into the nar­rative so we got a bit of con­text for the men’s protests, and although it’s dan­gerous to sim­plify the polit­ical situ­ation in the Middle East, for these men, their decision reflects their real con­vic­tion that Israel’s occu­pa­tion of the West Bank and Gaza are mor­ally wrong. Unfortunately, the dir­ector was ill and couldn’t attend the screening, so while there was a short Q&A, I think it could have been more inter­esting had the dir­ector been in attend­ance. The film did bring up important issues sur­rounding the (poten­tial) con­flicts between duty and morality.

More inform­a­tion on the film from the National Film Board of Canada

9/10(9/10)

EYE Weekly: *** (out of 5) (review)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }