family

L'heure d'été (Summer Hours)

L’heure d’été (Summer Hours) (Director: Olivier Assayas): On the one hand, Summer Hours has been get­ting some of the strongest reviews of the year, and yet in some quar­ters it is being derided as “the fur­niture movie.” Let me explain.

Hélène (Edith Scob) is the mat­ri­arch of a large extended family. Her daughter Adrienne and sons Frédéric and Jérémie visit her in her country home per­haps twice a year. Her uncle was a famous painter and so the house is filled with valu­able objets d’art; paint­ings and fur­niture are both everyday objects and valu­able art pieces. She pulls aside eldest son Frédéric (Charles Berling) during a family visit to speak to him about what should be done with all these things after her death. He doesn’t want to listen. Of course we’ll keep the house as it is, he tells her, for them and their chil­dren. But when she dies unex­pec­tedly, it turns out that his sib­lings have dif­ferent feelings.

Adrienne (Juliette Binoche) works as a designer in New York City and is con­stantly in motion. She treas­ures her memories but has no attach­ment to the things now that her mother has gone. Jérémie (Jérémie Renier) works as a plant man­ager in China and has settled there with his wife and chil­dren. He needs money to buy a bigger house. So the push and pull begins over what to do with everything. Considering some of the cri­ti­cism I’d heard, I expected this to be petty, but it def­in­itely is not. This family loves each other deeply, but their lives have taken them to dif­ferent places.

Assayas’ film poin­tedly asks us what our “stuff” actu­ally means to us. Hélène laments that when she goes, so much goes with her. Each object in her house has a his­tory that only she can tell. The children’s memories are dif­ferent, less attached, and the grand­chil­dren hardly know the place at all. The film is a moving med­it­a­tion on growing old and leaving the world. When each person dies, she takes many things out of the world forever. Though the objects are left behind, their life has gone with the person who held their story. In the end, objects, even beau­tiful ones, are only objects when their stories have been forgotten.

Far from being a movie about fur­niture, Summer Hours is about human beings and their abso­lutely unique con­tri­bu­tions to the world. I could not watch this film without thinking every second of another film. Mia Hansen-Løve, Assayas’ wife, dir­ected the sim­il­arly powerful Le père de mes enfants (The Father of My Children) (review). Not only do they share a sim­ilar theme, but both fea­ture the lovely and mag­netic Alice de Lencquesaing, who has a very bright future ahead of her. As well, both dir­ectors have an incred­ible way of working with their actors, coaxing per­form­ances of real depth. Though I don’t think Hansen-Løve’s film has yet received the acclaim it deserves, the two films would make a won­derful double-bill.

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

October Country
Editor’s Note: Doc Soup is a monthly doc­u­mentary screening pro­gramme run by the good folks at Hot Docs. It gives audi­ences in Toronto, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver their reg­ular doc fix each year from the fall through to the spring, leading up to the Hot Docs fest­ival itself.

October Country (Directors: Donal Mosher and Michael Palmieri): Photographer Donal Mosher has been cre­ating photo-essays of his family for many years. When cine­ma­to­grapher Palmieri saw them, he sug­gested they make a film. From that simple idea came this lovely, haunting por­trait of a troubled American family. Mosher’s family live in Ilion, a small town in upstate New York, and the film covers a period of one year, begin­ning and ending with Hallowe’en. The title and Hallowe’en theme fit per­fectly, since this is a family that seems haunted by the ghosts of the past.

Patriarch Don is an emo­tion­ally remote Vietnam vet, strug­gling with what he wit­nessed (and per­haps par­ti­cip­ated in). He’s com­pletely estranged from his sister Denise, a lonely Wiccan who has always found solace in other worlds. Don’s wife Dottie seems to be the centre and the rock of the clan, loving everyone even when her hard-bitten wisdom is ignored, which is pretty much all the time. Her daughter Donna, who has become a grand­mother in her thirties, sees her own daughter Danael making exactly the same mis­takes that she once made. Then there’s Desiree, just entering her tur­bu­lent teens and won­dering if she can escape the cycles of des­pair that the rest of the family seem doomed to repeat. Making occa­sional appear­ances (when he’s not in jail or partying with his friends) is Chris, Don and Dottie’s foster son, who has returned their patient love by rob­bing them on more than one occasion.

In this remark­ably intimate film, each family member speaks openly about their troubles, and their efforts to break out of their destructive pat­terns, but some­thing always stops them. It doesn’t help that their town is eco­nom­ic­ally depressed, with the only steady jobs avail­able at the local gun plant. Wal-mart is not only their only place to shop; its parking lot has become some­thing of a town square, where everyone gathers to watch fire­works. Danael escapes one violent rela­tion­ship with her baby’s father only to fall into another one. Her choice of men is as lim­ited as her choice of career. The older mem­bers of the family smoke rue­fully and shake their heads.

And yet. For all the gloom in the film, we can’t help caring deeply for each member of this admit­tedly dam­aged family. They are artic­u­late, honest, and often funny, and we root for them, even when we know that nothing much can really change. Palmieri’s camera catches numerous moments of beauty in the Moshers’ lives, and Dottie admits that even with all the town’s liab­il­ities, it’s still her favourite place to be.

Mosher and Palmieri have allowed us into the lives of people who make up a much larger pro­por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion than movies and tele­vi­sion would ever lead us to believe. Their lives are hard, but not without meaning. The one curious omis­sion in the film is Donal Mosher him­self. It would have been much more inter­esting to see his inter­ac­tions with his family, espe­cially con­sid­ering that he’s one who did “get out” and make his way in the larger world. You’ll hear some of his reas­oning for not appearing in the film in the audio Q&A, but for some­thing that started out so per­sonal, he seemed determ­ined not to impose his own feel­ings onto the film.

October Country is brave and unflinching. It’s inter­esting to note that the film­makers gave the family mem­bers final cut of the film. Their hon­esty and elo­quence in the midst of their troubles dis­play some of the best qual­ities that human beings can embody, and the film is a beau­tiful por­trait of these imper­fect lives.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ectors Donal Mosher and Michael Palmieri from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 14:31

Official site of the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Kynodontas (Dogtooth)

Kynodontas (Dogtooth) (Director: Giorgos Lanthimos): Although I saw this film sev­eral days ago, it’s been dif­fi­cult to put my thoughts into words. Lanthimos has delivered an unfor­get­table and dis­turbing film, but not one that is easy to cri­tique or even describe. And though I con­sider myself more of a film reviewer than a critic, it’s even dif­fi­cult to provide any sort of plot summary.

Briefly stated, Dogtooth con­cerns a well-to-do Greek family, living in a large sub­urban house. The par­ents of three adult chil­dren have kept them con­fined to the house since birth, teaching them their own unique vocab­u­lary (the “sea” is a large arm­chair, the “phone” is a salt shaker, “zom­bies” are small yellow flowers, etc.). Though the chil­dren appear to be in their twen­ties, they are dressed like chil­dren and spend their days engaged in com­pet­itive games to gain the favour of their par­ents. Occasionally, the father pays Christina, the female security guard at his work­place, to relieve his son’s sexual urges. None of the chil­dren have names.

If this isn’t unset­tling enough, it soon gets worse. Christina takes a liking to the older daughter and gives her gifts in exchange for sexual favours. One of the gifts is a col­lec­tion of VHS movies, which the daughter watches after everyone is asleep. This little bit of the out­side world begins to obsess her. She asks her sister to call her Bruce, and begins quoting dia­logue from Rocky and Jaws. She lashes out viol­ently at her brother, and in one har­rowing scene, dances her­self into a frenzy. When her father finds out the source of this “evil,” he beats Christina and ban­ishes her from their home. In a matter-of-fact but deeply dis­turbing con­ver­sa­tion with his wife, they agree that one of the sis­ters will have to take Christina’s place.

The title of the film comes from another of the heart­breaking lies the par­ents have told their chil­dren. They will be ready to leave the house only when their dog­tooth (eye tooth) falls out. As the older daughter’s des­per­a­tion grows, she takes mat­ters into her own hands, and the res­ults are tragic. Aggeliki Papoulia is abso­lutely fear­less in this dif­fi­cult role, and the rest of cast make a strange and dis­turbing viewing exper­i­ence also sur­pris­ingly compelling.

This is a film of stun­ning visuals to accom­pany the ideas. The house is dec­or­ated in 70s kitsch style, which rein­forces the feeling of being trapped in time. The chil­dren are suf­foc­ating in this air­less envir­on­ment, and their sexual and violent urges are treated as some­thing to be con­trolled. Everything that should give them pleasure is turned into a com­pet­i­tion or a test of obed­i­ence. In the post-screening Q&A, Lanthimos explained that the gen­esis of the film came out of a dis­cus­sion he had with some friends who were get­ting mar­ried. When he expressed his doubts about the insti­tu­tions of mar­riage and family, his friends became extremely defensive. He decided to make a film about what would happen if a man went to the ulti­mate extreme to pro­tect his family. In an odd way, the film reminded me of Cleanflix (review), which I’d seen just the day before. The folly of thinking that evil comes only from out­side of us, or that our nat­ural desires are bad, always leads to tragic con­sequences, and yet it is ingrained in our society. Luckily, it rarely goes to such extremes, but Dogtooth is a par­tic­u­larly unset­tling reminder of the danger of idol­izing the idea of “family” values.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Giorgos Lanthimos from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 11:38

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Bomber

by James McNally on March 24, 2009

in Film Festivals,SXSW

Bomber

Bomber (Director: Paul Cotter): A well-edited trailer and an inter­esting premise drew me to this film, and I have to say up front that Bomber didn’t quite live up to expect­a­tions. It’s a film I wanted to like. Ross is an under­em­ployed art school graduate with an extremely pos­sessive girl­friend. To make things worse, he’s been dragged unwill­ingly along on a road trip with his par­ents. His father, Alistar, was a teenage bomber pilot for the Royal Air Force during the Second World War and wants to return to the small vil­lage in Germany he acci­dent­ally bombed in order to apo­lo­gize. Director Cotter used only three actors and seven crew, picking the rest of his cast from among the local townspeople. So far, so good. There is actu­ally a lot to like about Bomber: it’s beau­ti­fully shot in high-definition, there’s a won­derful soundtrack (espe­cially the songs by Sweden’s Marching Band), and the per­form­ances are gen­er­ally good. Where the film let me down was in its weak script. Hackneyed dia­logue and crude attempts at humour didn’t bother most of the audi­ence, but they did grate with this reviewer. The pacing could have been tightened up a bit too. The bits I enjoyed the most were actu­ally the dialogue-free shots of the family van driving through the Dutch and German land­scapes, accom­panied by the excel­lent soundtrack music. Unfortunately, those shots could very well have occurred in a car commercial.

Most frus­trating for me was the way son Ross pro­gresses from a total emo­tional melt­down in one scene, trying to attack his par­ents from out­side the van, to later giving them lec­tures filled with psy­chobabble like “you just have to express what you’re feeling.” Normally, com­edies are full of char­ac­ters this incon­sistent, but the problem is that Bomber isn’t strictly a comedy, and when it went for any sort of emo­tional payoff, I was unmoved because these char­ac­ters hadn’t really been developed beyond sketches.

I sus­pect that Cotter fell prey to the mis­con­cep­tion that he needed to be an auteur, both writing and dir­ecting his first fea­ture film. Though the idea ger­min­ated with him and his own family his­tory (and in fact he has also written a radio play called Dropping Bombs essen­tially cov­ering the same ground), I think the story would have been better served by bringing in a more exper­i­enced scriptwriter, who could have pol­ished Bomber into a much better film.

Page for the film on the director’s web site

Trailer

6/10(6/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

C'est pas moi, je le jure! (It's Not Me, I Swear!)

C’est pas moi, je le jure! (It’s Not Me, I Swear!) (Director: Philippe Falardeau): Originally screened at TIFF in 2008, this bit­ter­sweet film from Québec returned as part of the Canada’s Top Ten screening series at Cinematheque Ontario this weekend, and I’m so glad I caught up with it.

Based on the mem­oirs of Bruno Hébert, C’est pas moi, je le jure! is the story of the troubled Doré family in 1968 Québec, told from the very unique per­spective of ten-year-old Léon, a liar, vandal and thief who will do just about any­thing to keep his bat­tling par­ents from split­ting up. When we first meet Léon, he’s hanging from a tree, and we’re unsure if this is the result of a mis­ad­ven­ture or a sui­cide attempt. Much of the rest of the film details the trouble he gets into, and those two pos­sib­il­ities remain in our minds. Clearly his “acting out” is a cry for atten­tion, and he admits as much when he explains that a strategically-lit fire always stops his par­ents from fighting, and even brings the family together as they struggle to put it out. Despite this example, it’s dif­fi­cult to convey just how skil­fully the film blends humour and heartache, but the mix­ture is a large part of the film’s appeal.

When he fails to stop his mother from run­ning off to Greece, Léon’s beha­viour becomes even more des­perate. He bonds with Léa, a girl from a sim­il­arly broken family, and they hatch a plan to steal money and buy plane tickets to Greece. Falardeau keeps this material from becoming too grim or too melo­dra­matic by not dwelling for too long on the characters’s feel­ings. Léon doesn’t mope, he acts, and even though the epis­odic nature of the film res­ulted in a few false end­ings, I was happy to keep fol­lowing along to see what Léon was going to do next.

He can go from smashing up a neighbour’s house while they’re on vaca­tion to sit­ting down and playing Schubert on their harp­si­chord. He behaves ter­ribly, but then feels remorse. He’s a boy trying to deal with an adult world, and without the coping mech­an­isms of his older brother Jérôme, he just lashes out without thinking. The per­form­ance of Antoine L’Écuyer is simply aston­ishing. He’s like a young Jean-Paul Belmondo, a gang­ster with a twinkle in his eye. The film itself reminded me of The 400 Blows, another chron­icle of a troubled child­hood that still sparkled with inno­cence. Supporting L’Écuyer’s incred­ible per­form­ance, Falardeau’s dir­ec­tion com­bines the nos­talgic set­ting, some swooping cine­ma­to­graphy, and the warm music of Patrick Watson to evoke a time and mood where the trans­ition between child­hood and some­thing else felt scary and exhil­ar­ating all at once.

Official web site of the film (English version)

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }