christianity

At The Death House Door

At The Death House Door (2008, Directors: Steve James and Peter Gilbert): Directors Steve James and Peter Gilbert won were nom­in­ated for an Oscar for their work together on Hoop Dreams in 1995, and I wouldn’t be at all sur­prised if their latest col­lab­or­a­tion isn’t recog­nized with at least a nom­in­a­tion at Oscar time next year. At the Death House Door intro­duces us to Reverend Carroll “Bud” Pickett, a retired Presbyterian min­ister in Huntsville, Texas. As he recounts, Huntsville used to be known for the rodeo, but over the past forty years or so, it’s become famous for all of its prisons. Reverend Pickett never intended to become a prison chap­lain, but that’s what he ended up doing. For 15 years during the 80s and 90s, he served as the “death house” chap­lain, the man with whom con­demned pris­oners spent their last day on earth. He would sit with them during the day, listen to whatever they wanted to say, eat their last meal with them, and, when the time came, just after mid­night, accom­pany them the short walk into the room where they would be strapped down and leth­ally injected. Reverend Pickett did this 95 times, and after each exe­cu­tion, he came home and recorded an audio cas­sette with his thoughts. Unable to share the pain of this min­istry with his family, and pre­vented by his hard Texas upbringing from crying freely, he poured his heart out for the tape recorder instead. Remarkably, with a few excep­tions, he had never listened to these tapes again after making them.

Meanwhile, Maury Possley and Steve Mills, a pair of invest­ig­ative reporters from the Chicago Tribune had begun writing a series about pos­sible cases of wrongful exe­cu­tion. One of the stories they uncovered was that of Carlos DeLuna, a young man from Corpus Christi, Texas, who was con­victed of the 1982 stabbing death of a gas sta­tion attendant. The police found him hiding under a truck shortly after the stabbing, and although he had no blood on him at all, and claimed inno­cence, he was arrested, tried, and con­victed. DeLuna main­tained his inno­cence and claimed that an acquaint­ance, Carlos Hernandez, was respons­ible for the killing, although no one, even his law­yers, listened. In 1989, he was executed at the young age of 27. Reverend Pickett was with him when he died, and des­pite claims that lethal injec­tion is quick and pain­less, he reported that DeLuna didn’t respond to the first drug, a sed­ative, and took 11 long minutes to die.

Possley and Mills visit with Pickett and dis­cover his archive of tapes. He tells them that of all the pris­oners he knew, DeLuna was the one that he was con­vinced was com­pletely inno­cent. Over the years, the strain of the job had nagged him, but espe­cially the notion that he was party to the exe­cu­tion of an inno­cent man. Although he had been a strong pro­ponent of the death pen­alty when he started the job, after accom­pa­nying so many men to the death chamber, his opinion had com­pletely changed. Whether they were guilty or inno­cent, Pickett cher­ished the time spent with the men, even as it strained him to be so power­less over their fates.

We spend the majority of the film with Reverend Pickett, cer­tainly a fas­cin­ating char­acter, but there are some other char­ac­ters, including DeLuna’s sister Rose, who still lives with the guilt that she should have done more. Pickett also intro­duces us to a younger col­league who worked as a death house guard until the strain of working in an insti­tu­tional death factory drove him to a break­down. Texas has executed more pris­oners than any other state and it’s clear that cap­ital pun­ish­ment is not deter­ring anyone. Not only that, it’s cre­ating more vic­tims as we see the fam­ilies of pris­oners suffer. Worse, it dehu­man­izes everyone involved in the pro­cess, from the pris­oner him­self to the prison guards and chap­lains who work for the state.

In one chilling scene, the camera floats around the prison as Texas executes its 400th pris­oner. We watch from a dis­tance as the man’s family are allowed access into the prison for their last visit, and then we see the guards bringing out the man’s per­sonal effects in bags and dumping them out­side the gates like so much garbage. Soon the man’s body will be taken out in much the same way. It’s heartbreaking.

Even as he came to strongly dis­agree with cap­ital pun­ish­ment, Reverend Pickett con­tinued his min­istry to these con­demned men, firstly because he “wasn’t a quitter,” but more import­antly, because they needed a friend at this moment, someone who would be there right until the end, even as their fam­ilies were ban­ished. Sadly, he informs us that the Texas prison system recently changed the system. Instead of having 18 hours with the pris­oner, now they’re brought into the death house at 4:00pm, showered, fed, and then executed at 6:00pm. The chap­lain barely has time to say a few words. One won­ders if this change is meant to inflict even more pain on the pris­oner, denying them any mean­ingful human con­tact at all.

At the Death House Door is deeply med­it­ative, due in major part to the char­acter of Reverend Pickett, a man who has been indelibly marked by his work. It has made him ques­tion his politics, his opin­ions, even his faith. It has estranged him at times from his wife and his chil­dren. But he made these sac­ri­fices because he truly believes no one should die alone. Wherever you stand on the ques­tion of cap­ital pun­ish­ment, this film will make you think about the people we ask to do the unthinkable.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ectors Steve James and Peter Gilbert from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 16:25

Offical site of the film
IFC’s Screening Party Kit
Trailer

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Audience of One

Audience of One (Director: Michael Jacobs): I’m finally reviewing this utterly unique doc­u­mentary that screened at the Toronto After Dark Film Festival way back in October. I was lucky enough to speak to the dir­ector by phone tonight and though my recording is (at this point) almost unus­able (crappy analog “phone taps”!!), I’ll try to work in some of the stuff we talked about into the review proper.

Richard Gazowsky is the pastor of the Voice of Pentecost church in San Francisco, and didn’t see his first movie until he was 40. But what an exper­i­ence it must have been, for soon after he dis­covered the joys of cinema, he exper­i­enced a “divine call” to make the greatest bib­lical epic ever. Audience of One fol­lows Gazowsky as he takes his con­greg­a­tion along on the almost incon­ceiv­able journey of making Gravity, a sci­ence fic­tion epic based on the bib­lical story of Joseph. Though he’s never dir­ected a film before, Gazowsky con­fid­ently takes the reins, and forms WYSIWYG (“What You See Is What You Get”) Christian Film Works. Accustomed to dreaming big, he announces that Gravity will be shot in 70mm at 60 frames per second. Despite an all-volunteer cast and crew, the pro­duc­tion soon decamps to Italy for some loc­a­tion shooting. Many prob­lems ensue, from bad weather to mech­an­ical prob­lems to a gen­eral lack of pre­par­a­tion. Gazowsky presses on, con­fident that God wants him to com­plete the film.

Michael Jacobs’ camera cap­tures the drama over a period of 18 months, from the con­fident begin­ning through the trials of pro­duc­tion and finally to what appears to be Gazowsky’s very public melt­down. Throughout, the pastor seems like an affable man, albeit a little obsessed with the idea of being a film­maker. Mysteriously prom­ised European funding fails to mater­i­alize, the bills pile up and the erstwhile dir­ector becomes more and more para­noid, sus­pecting the major stu­dios of trying to steal his script. The whole enter­prise spins fur­ther out of con­trol and by the film’s end, it appears that Richard Gazowsky has painted him­self into a corner. His obses­sion is com­pounded by his faith that God wants him to devote his life to making this film.

Though it doesn’t shy away from the reli­gious aspects of Gazowsky’s “quest,” this is really a uni­versal char­acter study. We see the pastor’s mother, a preacher her­self who founded the church, haunting the pro­ceed­ings with a sad look on her face. “I never should have turned the church over to him,” she laments. Gazowsky is a familiar char­acter, reminding me of Klaus Kinski’s indelible Fitzcarraldo and Harrison Ford’s Allie Fox (from The Mosquito Coast). But in this case, Gazowsky’s pride is unas­sail­able since he claims to be doing God’s work. But it also means he can never admit he was wrong.

Jacobs told me that Gazowsky has sup­ported the film and even par­ti­cip­ated in some Q&A ses­sions after screen­ings. But instead of admin­is­tering a much-needed wake-up call, it seems to have re-energized him to con­tinue raising funds to com­plete the film. Despite the immense amount of time and money spent already, only two scenes have been com­pleted, and although they weren’t shown in the film, Jacobs prom­ises to include them on the DVD release.

It seems ironic that, des­pite the title of his film being Gravity, nothing seems to be able to bring Richard Gazowsky back down to earth.

Official site for the film

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

For The Bible Tells Me So
Editor’s Note: Doc Soup is a monthly doc­u­mentary screening pro­gramme run by the good folks at Hot Docs. It gives audi­ences in Toronto (and now Calgary and Vancouver!) their reg­ular doc fix each year from the fall through to the spring, leading up to the Hot Docs fest­ival itself.

For The Bible Tells Me So (Director: Daniel Karslake): This doc­u­mentary came to my atten­tion through Joel Heller’s excel­lent site Docs That Inspire, before it played at Sundance this past January. The film explores the inter­sec­tion of homo­sexu­ality and reli­gion, par­tic­u­larly among con­ser­vative Christians, and as such, it tackles a sub­ject near and dear to me. I spent many years immersed in the evan­gel­ical sub­cul­ture and went through the very painful coming-out exper­i­ence of a close friend. This is exactly the sort of film I wish we’d had in the early 90s. Through the exper­i­ences of five Christian fam­ilies, each with a gay or les­bian child, we watch as real people struggle to integ­rate their love for their fam­ilies with their own beliefs and exper­i­ences. But this isn’t the typ­ical con­front­a­tional sort of film many of us have seen before. Instead, we meet clergy who have wrestled hon­estly with what the Bible says, and who are able to recon­cile their faith with accept­ance of gay and les­bian people. It’s gut-wrenching stuff, and not everyone will be con­vinced by the theo­logy, but at least it gets people dis­cussing the meaning of the dis­puted bib­lical pas­sages, rather than just quoting them.

I par­tic­u­larly liked that not all the fam­ilies are the same. Some still struggle to accept what they per­ceive to be their child’s “sinful” life­style, while others have gone on to polit­ical act­ivism (in some cases, even to the point of being arrested!). Karslake has made a very wise choice by adopting the name of a par­tic­u­larly obstinate opponent of gay rights, Focus on the Family, as his theme. By focus­sing on the real fam­ilies and exper­i­ences of gay people, he removes much of the appre­hen­sion and fear of straight people, espe­cially reli­gious straight people. I loved the way he intro­duced each family by having the par­ents explain how they them­selves met and fell in love. It showed us that attrac­tion and romance are at the root of all of our fam­ilies, and that the rela­tion­ships of gay people are really not much dif­ferent than anyone else’s.

If I have any mis­giv­ings about the film, they are rel­at­ively minor. One is the use of a short anim­ated seg­ment to try to explain some of the recent sci­entific research around homo­sexu­ality. I thought the tone was a little too self-consciously light-hearted and I thought the seg­ment was largely unne­ces­sary. The other quibble was that earlier in the film, Focus on the Family’s Dr. James Dobson is (right­fully) called out for com­paring advoc­ates of gay mar­riage to Hitler, but then later, actual footage of Hitler is used to describe the per­se­cu­tion of gay people. I don’t think you can have it both ways.

Nevertheless, this is a fair, gen­erous, and incred­ibly moving por­trait of real people trying to recon­cile their deepest-held beliefs with their very iden­tities of them­selves or of those closest to them. I’m not ashamed to tell you that I was moved to tears sev­eral times. Despite that, I think it’s a film that would move others who are per­haps not quite so close to the issues. My wife and I have a run­ning joke. We’ve got the great idea that if only fun­da­ment­alist Christians and gay people could actu­ally meet each other instead of hurling insults across the divide, much under­standing and even recon­cil­a­tion could be achieved. I’ve offered to hold a series of dinner events called “Fags and Fundies” to which we could invite quite a few of our friends. I think I’ve found the per­fect film to get the dis­cus­sion started.

NOTE: The film is showing in various venues in the US in the coming months, but so far, there are no Toronto screening dates. Check the film’s site for any changes, and look for a DVD release in the coming months.

UPDATE (January 9, 2008): The film’s Toronto premiere will be tonight at the Bloor Cinema as part of the Doc Soup pro­gramme. Director Daniel Karslake will be in attend­ance. Screenings at 6:30pm and 9:15pm.

Official web site of the film

Docs That Inspire’s Joel Heller inter­views dir­ector Daniel Karslake

Soulforce, an organ­iz­a­tion of gay and les­bian Christians and their straight allies fighting reli­gious bigotry

PFLAG (Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays)

9/10(9/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Toronto After Dark Film Festival

For a film fest in just its second year, the Toronto After Dark Film Festival (October 19–25) is run like a well-oiled machine. Adam Lopez, Twitch’s Todd Brown, and the rest of the staff are well-organized and pro­fes­sional, not to men­tion gen­erous. They’re ready to bring another col­lec­tion of cutting-edge horror, sci-fi, and fantasy films to town. After all the hype and celebrity-watching of TIFF, it’s refreshing to look for­ward to a fest­ival on a more human scale (and with more zom­bies!). Though I’m not a huge horror fan, After Dark brings enough weird stuff here that I’m sure I’ll find a lot to like. They’ve just announced their first seven fea­tures, and I’m par­tic­u­larly thrilled to see that Audience of One will be making its Canadian premiere. I missed it at SXSW this spring and have been prac­tic­ally beg­ging dir­ector Mike Jacobs to bring it Toronto.

Audience of One

It’s the story of Pentecostal pastor Richard Gazowsky, who believes that God is calling him to make an epic sci-fi film based on the bib­lical story of Joseph. Despite the fact that he didn’t see a movie at all until he was 40 years of age, he decides that he must be the dir­ector. Anything and everything that can go wrong, does, and Jacobs’ camera is there to cap­ture the whole train wreck on film. I’m hoping to get an inter­view with the dir­ector when he’s here.

If that’s not up your alley, check out the fest’s excel­lent web site for more premiere announce­ments. Single tickets go on sale September 26th, and if you’ve been paying for tickets to “that other film fest­ival,” you’ll be delighted at the prices. An even better value is the $99 VIP Pass (but hurry, there are only 100 available).

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Silent Light (Luz silenciosa)

Silent Light (Luz silen­ciosa) (Director: Carlos Reygadas): Another one of my pre­viewed films that made the final cut, Silent Light is a bit intim­id­ating to write about. Beginning with a stun­ning six minute shot of the sun rising over a Mennonite homestead, the film alerts us that it is going to require patience and a cer­tain sense of con­tem­pla­tion. And it estab­lishes right away that everything that fol­lows, the human story, is sec­ondary to the cycles of nature, to the cir­ca­dian rhythms of the nat­ural world, to the pulse of life that beats deep down in the earth and that echoes throughout the uni­verse. I’m sorry if I’m using high-flown lan­guage; it’s the effect of this strangely haunting film.

Johan is a simple farmer who’s lived his whole life among the Mennonites of northern Mexico. They don’t com­mu­nicate much with out­siders, and speak their own Plautdietsch dia­lect of German. He lives with his wife Esther (Canadian nov­elist Miriam Toews in a sur­prising role) and their large family. The film’s crisis comes when we learn that Johan has been car­rying on an affair with Marianne, another woman in the com­munity. He’s been honest about it with Esther from the begin­ning, and has tried to break it off, but deep in his heart he feels that Marianne is his “nat­ural woman” and that mar­rying Esther was a mis­take. Though he clearly loves her and his chil­dren, he’s torn by the power of his pas­sion for the other woman as well as his con­vic­tion that she is his intended match. Reygadas’ decision to use authentic Mennonite non-professionals has mixed res­ults. Though it’s clear that these are stoic people who use few words, in places the dia­logue still felt excess­ively mannered. He is able to achieve more with the camera than with any spoken dia­logue, and that’s where the film finds its emo­tional power.

The cine­ma­to­graphy and sound design are almost Dogme-like in their sim­pli­city, which makes the film’s climax all the more sur­prising for some. Without giving any­thing away, all I’ll say is that unlike many, I found it com­pletely nat­ural and moving in its sim­pli­city. And although this is sup­posedly a com­munity built on Christian faith, I found some­thing closer to pan­theism beating at its heart.

Here is the Q&A with dir­ector Carlos Reygadas from after the screening:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 23:58

Trailer
Official Site

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }