Special Events

5 MDFF Shorts at the Royal Cinema
Kazik Radwanski and Dan Montgomery (Medium Density Fibreboard Films)

Earlier this spring I had the pleasure of meeting Kazik Radwanski (dir­ector) and Dan Montgomery (pro­ducer), the gen­tlemen behind Medium Density Fibreboard Films, or MDFF for short. Or shorts, as it hap­pens, because short films are what they make. Kaz and Dan are gradu­ates of Ryerson University’s film depart­ment and since 2007 have col­lab­or­ated on four short films which have been shown and awarded all over the world. They recently teamed up with Vancouver-based dir­ector Antoine Bourges to release his short film Woman Waiting.

This Wednesday, May 18, at 7pm, they’ll be showing all five films at the Royal Cinema (608 College St.). There will be a Q&A after­ward, mod­er­ated by the Royal’s pro­grammer Stacey Donen, fol­lowed by a party at Crawford (718 College St.).

Assault (2007)

Assault (2007)

Director: Kazik Radwanski

A young man goes through the phone book frantic­ally calling law­yers. With each call, we learn more about what he has done.

Teaser trailer

Princess Margaret Blvd. (2008)

Princess Margaret Blvd. (2008)

Director: Kazik Radwanski

A por­trait of Isabelle, a woman con­fronted with a recent dia­gnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.

Teaser trailer

Out in That Deep Blue Sea (2009)

Out in That Deep Blue Sea (2009)

Director: Kazik Radwanski

A real-estate agent in a slump. Midlife crisis or exist­en­tial meltdown?

Teaser trailer

Green Crayons (2010)

Green Crayons (2010)

Director: Kazik Radwanski

A spit­ting con­test between two kids raises the ire of their teacher.

Teaser trailer

Woman Waiting (2010)

Woman Waiting (2010)

Director: Antoine Bourges

A middle-aged woman strug­gling with poverty is forced to wait as she tries to get help from “the system.”

Teaser trailer

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Chungking Express (1994)

Cinematographer Christopher Doyle has worked with some of the world’s most renowned dir­ectors over a career that has spanned almost three dec­ades. Best known for his work with Asian dir­ectors, per­haps his greatest col­lab­or­a­tion over the years has been with Wong Kar-wai. The two first worked together on 1990’s Days of Being Wild but the part­ner­ship really hit its stride with 1994’s Chungking Express (above), where, according to the TIFF notes, Doyle trans­formed Hong Kong into “a woozy array of sub­lime neons and entropic slow-motion, a dizzying dance of dis­or­i­ent­a­tion and dis­place­ment.” Amazingly, the film was shot in just two months in the middle of the pro­tracted pro­duc­tion of Wong’s epic Ashes of Time.

Doyle will be at the TIFF Bell Lightbox on Saturday April 23 at 7:00pm to dis­cuss his work on Chungking Express and likely many of his other films as well. Tickets are avail­able now.

Chungking Express opens its own engage­ment at the Lightbox on Thursday April 21st and will play for at least a week.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Controversial Directors in Nayman's Terms

Eye Weekly film critic Adam Nayman has been teaching a series of film classes with the cheeky tag “in Nayman’s Terms.”

I was priv­ileged to attend a couple of classes in the last series, on the concept of national cinema “New Waves” and am excited that he’s run­ning another series, begin­ning March 21st. This time, he’s tack­ling con­tro­ver­sial dir­ectors and will focus on a dif­ferent one each week. All classes are held at the Miles Nadal JCC (750 Spadina Ave., at Bloor St.) and run from 7:00pm to approx­im­ately 9:00pm:

In addi­tion to his work for Eye Weekly, Adam is a reg­ular con­trib­utor to Cinemascope, Cineaste, Reverse Shot, POV, Montage, LA Weekly, Film Comment, and The Village Voice. He’s also the best sort of critic, someone who is able to actu­ally edu­cate you about film without coming across as a pom­pous ass. The classes are an invig­or­ating blend of low-key lec­ture and gen­erous selec­tions of clips.

You don’t need to pre-register or commit to the whole series. Classes are $12 each ($6 with stu­dent ID) and as a past attendee, I can bring someone along for free! Wanna be my +1? Just let me know!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Before the Revolution (Prima della rivoluzione)
Before the Revolution (Prima della rivoluzione) screens at TIFF Bell Lightbox on Friday January 14 at 6:30pm. Buy tickets

Before the Revolution (Prima della rivoluzione) (Director: Bernardo Bertolucci): Bertolucci’s second fea­ture, and the first written by the dir­ector, is bound to be a bit more auto­bi­o­graph­ical than La com­mare secca’s explor­a­tion of the Italian under­class. Even though it’s loosely based on Stendhal’s novel The Charterhouse of Parma, the dir­ector, just 23 when he made the film, surely drew upon some con­flicted feel­ings about his own upbringing. Fabrizio (Francesco Barilli) is a child of priv­ilege who’s been under the tutelage of a Communist teacher. He yearns to escape his bour­geois fate, and so dumps his gor­geous but simple girl­friend Clelia (the stun­ning Cristina Pariset) to pursue revolu­tion in a more monk­like fashion. Enter his young Aunt Gina (Adriana Asti), a neur­otic and con­fused beauty who has come from Milan to stay with her sister’s family in Parma. At first Fabrizio is dis­tracted by the sui­cide of his unhappy (and quite prob­ably gay) friend Agostino, a young man he was trying to tutor polit­ic­ally. His reac­tion is more one of dis­ap­point­ment than of grief, but it plants a seed that maybe his polit­ical act­ivism isn’t the solu­tion to all of life’s problems.

The emotionally-needy Gina, mean­while, has become obsessed with her nephew and before long they fall into a pas­sionate affair. This for­bidden tryst is some­what of a polit­ical act for Fabrizio, but for the self-loathing older woman, it’s an act of des­per­a­tion. For all the dazz­ingly stylish images Bertolucci frames for us, he can’t make these two self-absorbed people very sym­path­etic char­ac­ters, and I found my patience tested more than once with some of the bom­bastic speechifying.

Adriana Asti in Before the Revolution (Prima della rivoluzione)

Strangely enough, it’s a scene almost entirely divorced from the nar­rative up to that point that brought me back into the film. Gina goes to visit an aris­to­cratic man a little bit older than her­self, whom she calls “Puck.” For some unex­plained reason, Fabrizio and his Communist mentor Cesare show up a little while later. Puck’s mono­logue about his own lack of pur­pose as a child of the bour­geoisie is unex­pec­tedly poignant, espe­cially for a char­acter we’ve just met. As he stands on the riverbank looking out over the unspoiled wil­der­ness of his estate, he explains to the group that all his land is mort­gaged and that he is about to lose everything. Businessmen will buy the land up and develop it, erasing its pas­toral serenity. He real­izes his own use­less­ness as a member of society, never having earned a degree or learned a trade. Fabrizio upbraids him for his “false sin­cerity” but after Gina slaps his face, he begins to recog­nize him­self in the older man. There is no escape for the chil­dren of the bourgeoisie.

Despite the rel­at­ively narrow gap in their ages, Gina and Fabrizio are def­in­itely on two sides of a gen­er­a­tional divide. For the young man, he wants to change the present, to change him­self in an attempt to escape his fate, and to change the world by imposing the order he sees in a set of dog­matic polit­ical prin­ciples. Gina, on the other hand (and “Puck” as well) des­per­ately wants to hold onto the present. She has already felt the pas­sage of time and the dis­order of the real world and feels help­less in the face of the future.

Bertolucci uses a mish­mash of styles throughout, bor­rowing espe­cially from the French New Wave dir­ectors. There’s even a scene where Fabrizio goes to see Godard’s A Woman is a Woman, get­ting into a half-hearted argu­ment with a boorish cinephile after­wards. Just as in Godard’s work, I found some of the jump-cutting made the nar­rative dis­jointed in spots. And I found a few of the later scenes went on far too long. But just as often I found the cam­er­a­work dazzling, and some scenes were just a pure pleasure to watch: a scene of Fabrizio and Gina shop­ping, for example, or the dance scene which you can watch in the clip below. As for the per­form­ances, the film belongs com­pletely to Adriana Asti as Gina. Despite my ref­er­ence to the “stun­ning” Cristina Pariset above, it’s Asti you can’t take your eyes off, even as her neur­otic mood swings make her char­acter unlike­able. By con­trast, Francesco Barilli is just a petu­lant rich boy. Though he’s ostens­ibly the prot­ag­onist, it’s Gina’s char­acter whose con­flicts remain most vis­ibly unresolved.

Kevin Lee’s excel­lent review and roundup of crit­ical opin­ions on the film is unsur­passed if you want to go deeper.

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Bernardo Bertolucci

From January 6th-19th, TIFF Bell Lightbox is presenting a ret­ro­spective of the work of Bernardo Bertolucci, a dir­ector whose work has always hovered around the peri­phery of my vision. I’m looking for­ward to cor­recting that over­sight. His film­making career has spanned 50 years and although he began working in a vaguely neor­ealist style, he quickly moved on to exper­i­ment with many other styles and a diversity of sub­ject matter. The TIFF pro­gram guide has clev­erly singled out his ever-present themes of “sex, politics and visual splendour” with a slightly naughty allit­er­ative tagline: Fashion, Fascists and Fucking (or F**king, if you’re sensitive).

Although the Lightbox will be a grand venue to watch (or revisit) some of his most well-known films (The Conformist, Last Tango in Paris, The Last Emperor), the real oppor­tunity is to see some of his lesser-known work. In par­tic­ular, I’m looking for­ward to Before the Revolution (1964) and Partner (1968), two form­ative works from the tur­bu­lent 60s which led up to his break­through film The Conformist in 1970.

Leaving aside the Fashion (“visual splendour”) side of the tri­angle for a moment, I’m fas­cin­ated by Bertolucci’s mix­ture of sen­su­ality and polit­ical frus­tra­tion. While the 60s seem to be the decade most asso­ci­ated with sexual lib­er­a­tion and polit­ical struggle, the dir­ector has made almost all of his films about indi­viduals strug­gling against larger forces and using sex as both a res­pite from the struggle and an act of per­sonal defi­ance. I’m intrigued by TIFF pro­grammer Jesse Wente’s obser­va­tion that “Bertolucci con­tinues to identify sex as a pro­foundly lib­er­ating force, a pure human freedom that defies the stric­tures and con­ven­tions of society.” I’m cer­tain that approaching the films with at least this state­ment in mind is going to help me appre­ciate Bertolucci’s sig­ni­fic­ance as a unique voice in world cinema.

Tickets can be pur­chased online for any of the films in the series. Here are a few images to whet your appetite:

{ Comments on this entry are closed }