TIFF

Sarah Palin: You Betcha!

Sarah Palin: You Betcha! (Directors: Nick Broomfield and Joan Churchill): Sarah Palin: You Betcha! seeks to get the real story behind the divisive former vice pres­id­en­tial can­didate and gov­ernor of Alaska, who has somehow man­aged to become a prom­inent figure on the American polit­ical land­scape, des­pite what appears to be an almost laugh­able lack of qual­i­fic­a­tions. Her short­com­ings become the focus of Broomfield and Churchill’s film, which will likely be dis­missed as a char­acter assas­sin­a­tion by the Republican right, but Palin’s defi­cien­cies are impossible to ignore. In fact, they’re front and centre.

Broomfield is best known for his doc­u­ment­aries Kurt & Courtney, Biggie & Tupac, and Aileen: Life and Death of a Serial Killer. Sarah Palin: You Betcha!, making its world premiere at the fest­ival, employs the same style used in many of his films, where Broomfield him­self fre­quently appears on-screen. Documentary pur­ists might bristle at the fact that the dir­ector, like Michael Moore, becomes such a prom­inent figure in his own films (which he also nar­rates), but it’s a style that works for him, mostly because of his quirky charm. One scene in the movie shows Broomfield arriving at an interviewee’s res­id­ence and begin­ning the inter­view with her before he’s even let inside; she talks to him through an open window as he tries to stay upright while standing on the sheet of ice that’s cov­ering her driveway, all while holding on to his ever-present boom micro­phone and audio recording equip­ment. The fact that he’s out­fitted in an ugly flannel jacket and funny looking winter hat with ear­flaps only adds to the enter­tain­ingly oddball scene.

Broomfield and Churchill (who does most of the camera work) spent ten weeks shooting in the dead of winter in Palin’s hometown of Wasilla, Alaska, which could best be summed up as a land of guns, God, and snow. The town itself is a bit of a fas­cin­ating sub­ject: it’s the crystal meth cap­ital of the state and home to a stag­gering 76 churches for the pop­u­la­tion of just 6,000. They inter­view Palin’s par­ents (mostly her father, Chuck), who at first are fairly wel­coming, but who soon become more leery of the film­makers as they find out they’ve been talking to some of their daughter’s enemies and detractors in town. Chuck is wor­ried about another “hit piece” by the media. Former Palin friends and class­mates are harder to find — the few that will talk tell the film­makers of wor­ries about reper­cus­sions from Palin and her sup­porters that could affect their ability to earn a living in the small town, or even their safety. One man from her high school inner circle dis­misses the revi­sionist PR job that Palin and her team did to paint her as a suc­cessful high school ath­lete who came to be known as “Sarah Barracuda” because of her tenacity. He says she was a very mediocre ath­lete and only got the “Barracuda” nick­name because their group of friends simply loved the song with the same name by Heart. The meatier parts of the film are the numerous inter­views with Palin’s former polit­ical col­leagues, who col­lect­ively depict her as someone who felt con­tempt for intel­lec­tuals, was dis­en­gaged from the polit­ical pro­cess, vin­dictive, naive, and dis­loyal. Some vari­ation of the phrase “thrown under the bus” occurs with comedic reg­u­larity from the former co-workers, but it’s most sobering when you hear a ver­sion of it from one of the senior strategists who worked on John McCain’s pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. It’s a damning indict­ment of the McCain camp that they failed to uncover Palin’s skel­etons, which appear to have been hiding in plain sight, before making her their vice pres­id­en­tial nominee.

The film­makers also speak to former family mem­bers, who use many of the same adject­ives that Palin’s polit­ical col­leagues used to describe her. Most prom­inent from this group is her former brother-in-law, Mike Wooten, who was the focus of the “Troopergate” scandal that implic­ated Palin over a pos­sible abuse of her powers, while gov­ernor, to get Wooten fired from his job as a state trooper. Unsurprisingly, he has nothing good to say about her, even making some fairly pointed accus­a­tions about the par­enting skills of Palin and her father. Of course, no doc­u­mentary on Palin would be com­plete without an exam­in­a­tion of her staunch reli­gious beliefs. The most inter­esting inter­views on the topic come from an Alaskan pastor who has a rocky his­tory with Palin, not­ably their dif­fer­ences on homo­sexu­ality in the church. He wor­ries about her mental sta­bility around some­thing as important as nuc­lear launch codes because of the fact that “she believes she’s God’s anointed one”.

Palin her­self remains an elu­sive target and the film never man­ages to get any closer to her than Broomfield’s appear­ances at a few of her book sign­ings, where she’s non-committal to his inter­view requests, and Broomfield turning up in the audi­ence at a couple of her speaking engage­ments. The speaking engage­ment scenes add comedic value, but do come off as some­what grand­standing on his part as he gets kicked out of one event after sur­repti­tiously asking Palin a ques­tion from the venue floor, and resorts to using a mal­func­tioning mega­phone at another as the audi­ence files out of the arena after the event, clearly not inter­ested in talking to him.

Churchill and Broomfield took to an online funding web­site for cre­ative pro­jects called Kickstarter last month in an effort to raise funds so the film could get dis­trib­uted in US theatres. They raised a little more than their target goal of $30,000 in less than three weeks and man­aged to secure a lim­ited release in New York and Los Angeles at the end of September. Audiences will dis­cover a con­sist­ently enter­taining and occa­sion­ally rev­el­atory por­trait of one of the most fas­cin­ating polit­ical fig­ures in recent memory.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Story of Film: An Odyssey

The Story of Film: An Odyssey (Director: Mark Cousins): Near the end of Mark Cousins’ monu­mental 15-hour his­tory of cine­matic innov­a­tion, there is a clip from Alexander Sokurov’s 2002 film Russian Ark. This remark­able film was filmed in one con­tinuous take, and the dir­ector rehearsed his cast for six months before the shoot. Then Cousins shows us some footage from a doc­u­mentary about the making of the film, scenes of the cast and crew just after Sokurov yells “Cut!” cheering, clap­ping, embra­cing, crying. It was not unlike the scene in Jackman Hall at the Art Gallery of Ontario at 1:00pm today. An enthu­si­astic audi­ence had gathered each day this week and watched the his­tory of cinema unfold hour after hour, decade after decade.

Six years in the making, The Story of Film: An Odyssey is a remark­able achieve­ment. With fin­an­cing in place for the equi­valent of a one-hour doc­u­mentary, Cousins traveled the globe, inter­viewing key fig­ures and assem­bling clips from almost a thou­sand films, cov­ering more than a cen­tury of film his­tory. But this is no standard talking head doc­u­mentary series. Most dis­tinctive is Cousins’ soothing nar­ra­tion, delivered in his gentle Belfast accent. Choosing to focus on the his­tory of cine­matic innov­a­tion rather than on the standard Hollywood nar­rative, the series ties together advances in tech­nique, tech­no­logy and influ­ence from places as far-flung as India, Mexico, Iran, China and sev­eral African countries.

In addi­tion to his desire to “de-centre” the Hollywood paradigm of film his­tory, he was also careful to make the series approach­able. If you’ll pardon the pun, Cousins stu­di­ously avoids using academic-sounding jargon like “mise-en-scène” or “auteur” and so this will make a won­derful intro­duc­tion to cinema for just about anybody.

It’s def­in­itely a per­sonal approach, and we were for­tu­nate to have the dir­ector in attend­ance each day. While med­it­ative and soothing on the soundtrack, Cousins is impish and lively in person, and he answered ques­tions anim­atedly after each three-hour seg­ment. By the end of the week, we’d come to feel like friends. Not sur­prising, for Cousins and his friend Tilda Swinton are known for cur­ating film events that feel like com­munities. In 2009, for instance, they organ­ized A Pilgrimage, a trav­eling film fest­ival that jour­neyed through Scotland by bus, set­ting up a port­able screen in sev­eral vil­lages to show films.

After today’s final screening, he gathered us together on stage to take a pho­to­graph together. Our odyssey through film his­tory might be fin­ished as far as this enchanting series goes, but I sus­pect it’s really just get­ting started.

Here are the Q&A ses­sions for each day with dir­ector Mark Cousins.

Monday September 12, 2011

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 16:27

Tuesday September 13, 2011

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 16:43

Wednesday September 14, 2011

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 6:10

Thursday September 15, 2011

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 11:26

Friday September 16, 2011

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (ver­sion 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest ver­sion here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Duration: 15:03

Facebook page for The Story of Film: An Odyssey

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Amy George

by James McNally on September 13, 2011 · 1 comment

in Film Festivals,TIFF

Amy George
Amy George screens at part of the Canada First pro­gramme at TIFF 2011.

Amy George (Directors: Yonah Lewis and Calvin Thomas): Toward the end of this quietly res­onant film, 13-year-old Jesse’s mother tells him about a time when he was a child that his par­ents thought they had lost him, but that they knew to just look up: “You came down from the trees like a monkey turning into a man.”

And although it’s a rare case where the writing feels a tiny bit forced, it just might sum up this intimate slice of adoles­cent life. It’s a glimpse, a snap­shot of a man in the pro­cess of form­a­tion. And it’s all the more remark­able because the average age of the cast and crew must be some­where around 20. Director/writers Yonah Lewis and Calvin Thomas are very recent (2008) film school gradu­ates, and the film’s exec­utive pro­ducer is 15-year-old actor Connor Jessup.

“Write what you know” is good advice for writers and Lewis and Thomas cer­tainly are not so far removed from the small ter­rors of adoles­cence. And new­comer Gabrielle Del Castillo Mulally is stuck right in the middle of them, ensuring that his con­stant expres­sion of puz­zle­ment comes from a genuine place.

Jesse is the son of well-meaning but flaky lib­eral par­ents (ex-Rheostatics drummer Don Kerr and his real-life spouse, author Claudia Dey) who are nav­ig­ating a fright­ening new stage of par­enting in which neither of them seems able to com­mu­nicate with their son. Mother Sabi nags Jesse to eat his vit­amins but won­ders to her hus­band whether he might be gay, or unpop­ular at school. It’s the stage where taking care of your kids seems to become expo­nen­tially more com­plic­ated than just making sure they’re fed and clothed and sheltered.

In reality, Jesse has lots of friends, even a close female friend, but he also seems to enjoy spending time by him­self. When an art teacher’s assign­ment requires him to take a pho­to­graph that rep­res­ents some aspect of him­self, he con­vinces his par­ents to buy him an “analog” camera and a tele­photo lens.

He also takes an off­hand remark from his teacher about being a “true artist” so lit­er­ally that he checks out a book from the lib­rary called “True Artist” in which the male author says defin­it­ively that no man can be a true artist until he has made love to a woman.

Throwing this “advice” into the churning stew of Jesse’s adoles­cent sexual awakening leads him into some murky ter­ritory; namely, up a tree across from his slightly older neigh­bour Amy George’s room, where he snaps a pic­ture of her. A few days later, the two are thrown together in unusual cir­cum­stances. After sneaking some alco­holic coolers from the fridge, and some exper­i­ments with hyp­notism, Jesse finds him­self tempted to go fur­ther than ever before in his sexual explor­a­tions on a passed out Amy.

In one of the film’s best scenes, he con­fesses his feel­ings of guilt to an older female family friend, who assures him he’s likely done nothing wrong, and that these things are more com­plic­ated than he thinks.

It’s barely an epi­phany, but the film con­tains a few of them, making us feel that Jesse, des­pite his con­tinued wide-eyed bewil­der­ment, is on his way.

It’s a remark­ably self-assured debut for the film­makers, and though there are a few rough spots tech­nic­ally (shaky camera, less than per­fect sound, a few uneven per­form­ances from the sup­porting players) and a bit of shape­less­ness to the story, it adds up to a sat­is­fying exper­i­ence. And it makes me happy to add another couple of young Canadian film­makers to my radar.

Official site of the film

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Take This Waltz
Take This Waltz screens at part of the Gala Presentations pro­gramme at TIFF 2011.

Take This Waltz (Director: Sarah Polley): Sarah Polley’s second dir­ect­orial effort, Take This Waltz starts out looking very much like a romantic comedy, and des­pite efforts to change gears later, never seems to achieve the weighty ser­i­ous­ness it needs. The super­fi­cial sheen of coin­cid­ental meet­ings and deserted spaces for lovers to flirt or to talk make it hard to take what is essen­tially a tragic story very seriously.

Margot (Michelle Williams) and Lou (Seth Rogen) have been mar­ried for four years, and their domestic routine is affec­tionate and a bit eccentric. In other words, like most couples, they share their own private lan­guage and long-running jokes. In small doses, this can add a unique intimacy to an on-screeen rela­tion­ship (I really liked the way Rashida Jones and Paul Rudd bantered in I Love You, Man, for example.) But over­used, as it is in Polley’s film, it makes the char­ac­ters annoying and infantile. And per­haps that’s her point. Margot and Lou never really seem to have an adult conversation.

Which makes Margot’s slow-burning flir­ta­tion with neigh­bour Daniel (Luke Kirby) such a powderkeg. Confused by her desire for some­thing new, Margot never really artic­u­lates to either man what it is she wants. Daniel appears out of nowhere and promises…well, what? Escape? Novelty? Temporary passion?

It’s never clear what he wants out of this flir­ta­tion either. In one more mad­dening rom-com touch, this power­fully attractive man has no mate, and the per­fect strong-sensitive work life. He works as a rick­shaw driver (macho side) but is also secretly an artist (sens­itive side). He is, in fact, the per­fect man.

But Lou isn’t so bad. Sure, he refuses to make con­ver­sa­tion at their anniversary dinner (“we’re not going out to ‘catch up’!” he scoffs), but he loves her like any good hus­band, some­times dis­trac­tedly but never less than deeply.

We see no evid­ence that they’re actu­ally bad for each other (unlike Williams’ superior turn in last year’s Blue Valentine, a film I’m sure will be drawing com­par­isons), so we’re left to think that Margot is simply pur­suing some­thing new and shiny.

When it turns out that it’s really Lou who learns from the affair, it makes it all the more frus­trating. On the cusp of having their first real on-screen grown-up con­ver­sa­tion, he says, “You didn’t want to have this dis­cus­sion before. Let’s not have it now.” It’s one of sev­eral moments when important things need to be said. And we don’t get to hear them. It robs the nar­rative of the angry and hurt con­front­a­tion that not only our couple, but the audi­ence, needs.

A series of word­less (of course) mont­ages near the end were almost laugh­able in their unreality, but when I wondered if Polley was pos­iting them as some sort of fantasy sequence, I looked back to the begin­ning of the film, and real­ized the whole begin­ning was equally phoney.

It’s painful to write those words, because I had very high hopes indeed for the film. And there are many things to like. My ini­tial fear that Seth Rogen would be the weak link was unfounded; his per­form­ance, in fact, felt the strongest of the three main char­ac­ters. And the cine­ma­to­graphy, by vet­eran Luc Montpellier (Cairo Time, Polley’s pre­vious film Away From Her), is gor­geous, lending Toronto a candy-coloured dream palette. It’s Polley’s script that fails for me. Perhaps she should have brought in Leonard Cohen (whose song “Take This Waltz” provided the film’s title if not its theme) for a rewrite.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Le Havre

by James McNally on September 9, 2011 · 1 comment

in Film Festivals,TIFF

Le Havre

Le Havre (Director: Aki Kaurismäki): Working on recur­rent themes, in his usual style and with many actors who have appeared in pre­vious films, Kaurismäki could be accused of making the same film over and over again. But to be fair, each iter­a­tion is just so lovely to watch that it’s easy to for­give him.

In the latest in his series of deadpan melo­dramas, André Wilms plays the perfectly-named Marcel Marx, a shoe­shine man eking out a modest exist­ence with his loving wife (the always won­der­fully droll Kati Outinen) in the port city of Le Havre in Normandy. I say perfectly-named because Marcel is a por­trait in gentle, almost silent, com­pas­sion with a bit of a polit­ical edge. It’s also an apt descrip­tion of the film.

Le Havre is one of France’s busiest ports and a major transit point for cargo trav­eling to Great Britain. It’s not sur­prising that it’s also a hub for illegal migrants trying to find a better life there. When a con­tainer is found to con­tain a human cargo of Africans trying to make it to England, Marcel’s settled life is turned upside down. Kaurismäki’s com­pas­sion and humanism is never more evident than in a sequence where the music drops away and he lingers on the face of each person inside the opened con­tainer. A young boy, Idrissa, evades the police roundup and is soon dis­covered by Marcel, who takes pity on him, bringing him food and even­tu­ally taking him into his own home. This is all the more sur­prising because his wife Arletty has taken ill and is con­fined to hos­pital. Even as he wor­ries about her, he ral­lies the ragtag com­munity that seems to exist in all Kaurismäki films to help the boy find his way to rel­at­ives in London. Similar to Philippe Lioret’s excel­lent Welcome (review), the film’s politics are strictly per­sonal, but with the sense that the protagonist’s growing aware­ness of the issue may change him for good.

It’s a ser­ious story, but told with his typ­ical light touch. Sublime lighting and a won­derful sense of com­pos­i­tion elevate the visuals to the point where it couldn’t be described as gritty or even real­istic, but it finds the beauty in each face and in the slightly shabby homes and store­fronts of Marcel’s neigh­bours. There is also a rather unlikely benefit con­cert per­form­ance by an eld­erly rocka­billy legend, whose pres­ence in the film is com­pletely unne­ces­sary but serves as another indic­a­tion of Kaurismäki’s big hearted loy­alty to his friends.

In the end, it’s not sur­prising that a little bit of magic seems to bring the story to a happy con­clu­sion. One critic I know has called Le Havre a mas­ter­piece, but it’s my firm belief that Aki Kaurismäki doesn’t set out to create mas­ter­pieces, and I don’t think he’d be com­fort­able with that term. Instead, he con­tinues to paint small and lovely por­traits of over­looked people. Whether he really believes in the good­ness of people or is just chal­len­ging us to live up to the ideals of char­ac­ters like Marcel makes little dif­fer­ence to me. It’s just a genuine pleasure to be able to enjoy the work of one of world’s great humanist filmmakers.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }