From the daily archives:

Thursday, January 8, 2009

The Cinema Eye Honors, doc­u­mentary awards organ­ized by AJ Schnack and Indiepix for the first time last year, are returning this March and the short­list has just been announced. Here are the lucky films:

I was actu­ally strangely excited by the fact that I’d only seen five of the nom­in­ated films. It just shows how much great work is being pro­duced each year. I’m looking for­ward to seeing a few more of these soon, hope­fully before the awards are announced in New York City on March 29th.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Cross-posted from Jay’s per­sonal blog, Bombippy.com. Visit for more reviews of poorly-projected first run films!

Why do I have to visit a film fest­ival or a home theatre to watch a movie pro­jected prop­erly? I’m sick of going to AMC Theatres and paying a premium for movies that are poorly projected.

AMC Kennedy Commons 20 is con­sist­ently bad when it comes to poor pro­jec­tion and they have the most expensive ticket prices in the city at $12.50! Last year I watched No Country For Old Men and their theatre and the exper­i­ence was awful. The entire length of the film was slightly out of focus, pro­jected on a five degree angle and had a bright flicker all the way through. One patron stood up and yelled that he was get­ting his money back.

I left the theatre to find a man­ager and com­plained about the pro­jec­tion as well. He gave me a couple of free passes and admitted that there was a problem with the pro­jector. Instead of can­celing the screen­ings until the pro­jector could be fixed AMC just car­ried on like everything was fine and prob­ably figured that the stupid public would never notice.

Yesterday I watched Valkyrie at AMC Whitby 24. The entire freaking movie was out of focus! What the hell is wrong with AMC? What’s wrong with the audi­ence that they put up with this crap?

Disappearing Projectionists

Part of the problem is that most movie houses aren’t using pro­jec­tion­ists any­more. According to Torontoist, AMC’s newest theatre at Yonge and Dundas has 24 screens with more people run­ning the con­ces­sion stand than the projectors:

Instead of pro­jec­tion­ists, there are one or two non-union workers over­seeing all 24 screens from a single con­sole; their duties are essen­tially lim­ited to pressing a “play” button and being aware of any error mes­sages that might pop up.

To be fair to AMC, most movie theatres are guilty of poor pro­jec­tion and sound. I don’t know how many out of focus doc­u­mentary films I’ve watched at the Bloor Cinema. They have a speaker on the east wall that has been crack­ling for the past 3 years as well. Maybe I should com­plain more, but I don’t think the theatre owners care.

First Run Films

Why should I pay $12.50 to watch a film and another $10 for pop­corn when I can watch a movie in Blu-ray at home that has more clarity than any­thing I’ve seen in any movie theatre to date? First run films. I like to see movies when they are first released and unfor­tu­nately that means lousy pro­jec­tion at the cineplex. You might think that digital pro­jec­tion is the answer but read You Pay Thirteen Bucks, And What Do You Get?

I sup­pose I could down­load the screeners that are floating around on the BitTorrent sites but I prefer quality over crap. Most of the DivX movies that are “free” suffer from really poor quality, lack of sur­round sound and audio drift. I can’t watch a movie that sounds like a poorly dubbed mar­tial arts movie. And not to sound self-righteous but there is also the whole piracy thing. If people con­tinue to steal movies the industry will con­tinue to suffer but that’s another rant.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

En la ciudad de Sylvia

by James McNally on January 8, 2009

in DVD

En la ciudad de Sylvia

En la ciudad de Sylvia (2007, Director: José Luis Guerin): When Guerin’s film played at TIFF last September, I remember being lured by the stills of a beau­tiful woman being tailed by a rakish young man, but what a strange little film it turned out to be. With long, almost dialogue-free shots, Guerin seems able to both dis­tance us and draw us into what at first seems to be a simple, even romantic story. The hand­some young man (Xavier Lafitte, looking vaguely like both David Bowie and Orlando Bloom) is a tourist in an unnamed French town (it’s Strasbourg, in Alsace, on the border with Germany), where he appears to be searching for someone. Day after day, he sits at a café near the School for Dramatic Arts, sketching in his note­book and people-watching. Well, truth­fully, he’s girl-watching, and Guerin’s camera lingers over many a beauty. As a man, I can say with con­fid­ence that Guerin cap­tures the sheer joy and pleasure of just looking at a beau­tiful woman. But our prot­ag­onist isn’t con­tent to just glance. He stares, and it’s obvious he’s searching each face for some memory.

All at once, he sees the one he’s been looking for, and jumps up, knocking over his beer. For the next half an hour, we follow him, in real time, as he pur­sues “Sylvia,” the name he’s written in his sketch­book. At first, the woman seems unaware of his pres­ence, but at one point he comes dan­ger­ously close and calls out to her. From then on, it appears that she’s half-aware of his pres­ence. He loses her, and we begin to wonder what’s going on. And then he finds her again, and by now it’s starting to feel just a little bit creepy. Is he just a garden-variety stalker? I often tease some of my female friends that the only dif­fer­ence between a romantic ges­ture and stalker beha­viour is whether the woman is at all phys­ic­ally attracted by her suitor. In this case, our man’s good looks have had us on his side up to now.

En la ciudad de Sylvia
Note: Possible spoilers in the next para­graph. Although this is far from a plot-driven film, I’ve col­oured the text white so you’ll need to click and drag your mouse cursor over the para­graph to read it. Sorry for the inconvenience.
When he finally gets on a tram and speaks to her, we’re almost 50 minutes into the film. Up to this point there has been very little in the way of dia­logue, and so when our prot­ag­onist speaks, he sounds a little des­perate. He asks her if she’s Sylvia, the girl he met at a bar in the city six years ago. She tells him he’s mis­taken. He’s crushed, and embar­rassed, or claims to be. We begin to wonder if his story is even true. Who would return six years later to find someone he chatted up in a bar? As she gets off the tram, the ten­sion winds down again.

Except that by the end, we’re not quite sure what he’s going to do. He seems unable to shake his fix­a­tion with her. For a film so filled with beau­tiful people, sun­shine, and cobbled streets, I found myself more than a little dis­turbed by the film’s con­clu­sion. In the first half hour, I was praising Guerin’s ability to cap­ture “the pleasure of looking” but by the time we reach the open-ended con­clu­sion, that phrase holds a decidedly more sin­ister resonance.

I loved the film’s formal con­struc­tion. Guerin lets his camera run before his char­ac­ters enter the frame and long after they’ve left it, grounding us in sev­eral loc­a­tions, to which he returns throughout the film. We see many of the same people sev­eral times in the film, although they don’t have speaking roles. It cap­tures a cer­tain claus­tro­phobia, even in a beau­tiful European town like Strasbourg. The sound design really cap­tured for me the feeling of trav­eling alone to a new place. The man hears music, but doesn’t really over­hear con­ver­sa­tions. His inter­ac­tions with everyone are per­func­tory. The whole film feels care­fully put together as a kind of puzzle, and although I’ve been thinking about it for some time, En la ciudad de Sylvia made me even more eager to study film theory. It’s the sort of film that doesn’t give up its secrets too easily, and which will reward repeat view­ings, even if it is only to look at the heart-stoppingly gor­geous Pilar López de Ayala. Perhaps there’s a little stalker in all of us?

8/10(8/10)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }