<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predicting the 2007 Oscar Winners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/</link>
	<description>Covering film in Toronto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-5779</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/#comment-5779</guid>
		<description>Cotillard was in &quot;Innocence&quot;? Wow, I don&#039;t remember that...I do agree that was a lovely film.

Thanks for that piece of info about the zoomed in picture Bill. Yes, that was indeed awful. I thought my friend had screwed up his projector&#039;s settings, but then we noticed that the CTV logo was in the right spot. That&#039;s bordering on criminal...I mean, here&#039;s a broadcast that is supposedly celebrating film and they do a pan and scan on it. Geezus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cotillard was in “Innocence”? Wow, I don’t remember that…I do agree that was a lovely film.</p>
<p>Thanks for that piece of info about the zoomed in picture Bill. Yes, that was indeed awful. I thought my friend had screwed up his projector’s settings, but then we noticed that the CTV logo was in the right spot. That’s bordering on criminal…I mean, here’s a broadcast that is supposedly celebrating film and they do a pan and scan on it. Geezus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McAlpine</title>
		<link>http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-5769</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McAlpine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/#comment-5769</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to both Moen and Bob on your fruitful Oscar picks, nice work guys!
I didn&#039;t make any real predictions and wasn&#039;t too upset about any of the winners...I&#039;m just glad the &#039;Juno&#039; didn&#039;t win big.

Moen, I can&#039;t believe that you didn&#039;t pick Marion Cotillard for Best Actress, especially after listening to your endless praising of her performance last year. I even went to see it just because of your praise!

The Oscar show was fun but once again for the second year in a row, the show was ruined by CTV&#039;s horribly zoomed in picture (to eliminate the permanent ABC logo on the left side of the screen), making a complete shambles of all the on-screen text and movie clips...it was painful to watch. 
Someone should lodge a complaint with the CRTC over this practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to both Moen and Bob on your fruitful Oscar picks, nice work guys!<br />
I didn’t make any real predictions and wasn’t too upset about any of the winners…I’m just glad the ‘Juno’ didn’t win big.</p>
<p>Moen, I can’t believe that you didn’t pick Marion Cotillard for Best Actress, especially after listening to your endless praising of her performance last year. I even went to see it just because of your praise!</p>
<p>The Oscar show was fun but once again for the second year in a row, the show was ruined by CTV’s horribly zoomed in picture (to eliminate the permanent ABC logo on the left side of the screen), making a complete shambles of all the on-screen text and movie clips…it was painful to watch.<br />
Someone should lodge a complaint with the CRTC over this practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moen Mohamed</title>
		<link>http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-5768</link>
		<dc:creator>Moen Mohamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/#comment-5768</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob, it seems we scored the same - 14.  The winner in your pool definitely scored well.  16/24 is excellent.  I was disappointed with the MADAME TUTLI-PUTLI loss, you are right, based on the clips of the films in this category, this film was far ahead in terms of quality.

Twice I jumped for joy during the show and that was for Marion Cotillard and Tilda Swinton.  I didn&#039;t think either would win, but they both deserved to, and were the best among the nominated actresses.

I would have been happy if Tamara Jenkins won for original screenplay for THE SAVAGES.  

Marion Cotillard&#039;s transformation is awe-inspiring.  If you see her in JEUX D&#039;ENFANTS, A GOOD YEAR (with Russell Crowe) and as the vengeful assassin in A VERY LONG ENGAGEMENT, you will see what I mean.  I believe she was also one of the teachers in Lucile Hadzihalilovic&#039;s criminally underrated INNOCENCE.  I love this film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob, it seems we scored the same — 14.  The winner in your pool definitely scored well.  16/24 is excellent.  I was disappointed with the MADAME TUTLI-PUTLI loss, you are right, based on the clips of the films in this category, this film was far ahead in terms of quality.</p>
<p>Twice I jumped for joy during the show and that was for Marion Cotillard and Tilda Swinton.  I didn’t think either would win, but they both deserved to, and were the best among the nominated actresses.</p>
<p>I would have been happy if Tamara Jenkins won for original screenplay for THE SAVAGES.  </p>
<p>Marion Cotillard’s transformation is awe-inspiring.  If you see her in JEUX D’ENFANTS, A GOOD YEAR (with Russell Crowe) and as the vengeful assassin in A VERY LONG ENGAGEMENT, you will see what I mean.  I believe she was also one of the teachers in Lucile Hadzihalilovic’s criminally underrated INNOCENCE.  I love this film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-5764</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.torontoscreenshots.com/2008/02/22/predicting-the-2007-oscar-winners/#comment-5764</guid>
		<description>Wow...Moen, your picks and my picks differed in only three categories - Live Action Short (which you got right), Sound Editing (which I got right) and Supporting Actress (which neither of us got - I thought the love for Cate would spill over here).

My score of 14 got me second place in our friend&#039;s pool (the winner had 16).

I&#039;m a bit bummer by Tutli-Putli&#039;s loss (&quot;Peter And The Wold&quot;? OK, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a fine film, but those clips didn&#039;t even come close to the quality of Tutli-Putli. Not to mention going with a tried and true story that&#039;s been done hundreds of times already...), but otherwise I didn&#039;t mind any of the picks.

And Marion Cotillard is really gorgeous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow…Moen, your picks and my picks differed in only three categories — Live Action Short (which you got right), Sound Editing (which I got right) and Supporting Actress (which neither of us got — I thought the love for Cate would spill over here).</p>
<p>My score of 14 got me second place in our friend’s pool (the winner had 16).</p>
<p>I’m a bit bummer by Tutli-Putli’s loss (“Peter And The Wold”? OK, I’m sure it’s a fine film, but those clips didn’t even come close to the quality of Tutli-Putli. Not to mention going with a tried and true story that’s been done hundreds of times already…), but otherwise I didn’t mind any of the picks.</p>
<p>And Marion Cotillard is really gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
